similar to: scary messages from autoconf

if anyone ever serches here for using responsa in linux then you should know that: it works! for more info look here: http://www.whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=31072&start=30&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

I concur with Jose. The Atmel AVR series packs a lot of bang for the buck. They also come in a 3.3v low power version for use in battery powered systems. Gene -----Original Message----- From: Leo Ann Boon [mailto:leo@innovax.com.sg] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:21 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Open source IP phone, maybe? Ubicom's Scenix IP2K.

Hi! I think it is a great idea. The DS80C400 needs external memory, and/or flash. It have the Ethernet integrated, but it is really slow (it is 8051 architecture), and yes, I know it can go up ti 75Mhz, but only gives 18MIPS max. I would use ATmega128 from atmel (16MIPS at only 16Mhz), take a look at: http://www.ethernut.de (project using mega128 with Ethernet, includes schematics). It

Hi, folks I am "stll" trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PS3 machine, which has a 64-bit OS. Here is my system information and configuration options: ----------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ps3 2.6.32-rc2-00995-g96ebbe6-dirty #2 SMP Fri Oct 2 15:12:28 CST 2009 ppc64 Cell Broadband Engine, altivec supported GNU/Linux $ gcc --version

I'm still trying to debug the validator buildbot. I'm getting this error when building some variants of llvm-gcc-4.2: /bin/sh ../../src/gcc/mkconfig.sh bconfig.h gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-common

On 2009-04-03 18:39, David Greene wrote: > I'm still trying to debug the validator buildbot. > > I'm getting this error when building some variants of llvm-gcc-4.2: > > /bin/sh ../../src/gcc/mkconfig.sh bconfig.h > gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros >

Hi all, I have successfully built LLVM itself, as all the tools (llc et al) are working fine. I built the latest release version (2.7). I have been trying to build the llvm-gcc frontend on a sparc machine. I encountered the following issues : 1) During configuration, the default assembler (installed at /usr/ccs/bin) is chosen to be used, but I want to use the GNU assembler (installed at

Hello to every Samba expert out there, We've been having a hard time figuring out a particular problem with Samba. After joining the Server 2003 ADS, which is on a different subnet - just going through a router, the membership would drop all of a sudden. Everything works great when the Samba server is on the same subnet as the Server 2003 ADS. I have posted some details on forums, here is a

Hi In my install directory under bin , I had llvm-c++,llvm-g++,llvm-gconv I tested one sample program #llvm-c++ addu.c -o addu-arm as: unrecognized option '-meabi=4' How do i solve this issue Thanks Yuvi R On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, raj raja <yuvaraj.addu at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply > > I got error > > */bin/sh: build/genmodes: not

Still working on the validator buildbot as I can. Now I'm tackling what appears to be a configure problem for llvm-gcc-4.2. Here's the configure log: ../src/configure --prefix=/ptmp/dag/buildbot/slaves/llvm-validate/llvm-validate-release-kentsfield-linux/build/install --program-prefix=llvm-

Hi Thanks your info On 7/8/11, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > It sounds like you're using an incorrect version of binutils (one that > targets x86 instead of ARM, for example). > > > > You require an ARM-targetting assembler and linker. > > > > James > > > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi, folks I am trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PowerPC machine. Actually, the PowerPC is a PS3. The source was downloaded from http://llvm.org/releases/2.8/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source.tgz Here is my system information and configuration options: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ps3 2.6.32-rc2-00995-g96ebbe6-dirty #2 SMP Fri Oct 2

Hello, I have different results from these two softwares for a simple binomial GLM problem. >From Genmod in SAS: LogLikelihood=-4.75, coeff(intercept)=-3.59, coeff(x)=0.95 >From glm in R: LogLikelihood=-0.94, coeff(intercept)=-3.99, coeff(x)=1.36 Is there anyone tell me what I did wrong? Here are the code and results, 1) SAS Genmod: % r: # of failure % k: size of a risk set data

I have a zfs dataset that I use for network home directories. The box is running 2008.11 with the auto-snapshot service enabled. To help debug some mysterious file deletion issues, I''ve enabled nfs logging (all my clients are NFSv3 Linux boxes). I keep seeing lines like this in the nfslog: <br> <br> <pre> Wed Aug 19 10:20:48 2009 0 host.name.domain.com 1168

I'm still working on figuring out why some accesses to profile data are failing. We are running 3.3.2-0.33.fc11 (the latest release for FC11). I saw this in the log file stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [USER/STARTMENU] -> [user/StartMenu] [2009/07/08 17:39:59, 3] locking/locking.c:fetch_share_mode_unlocked(857) fill_share_mode_lock failed I saw Volker had a fix

i got this link from another list. does this affect applications running in wine? http://security.tombom.co.uk/shatter.html -- Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS, and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings. http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/ http://www.freelists.org/list/cad-linux

Hi, Checking in - this is still an issue with 2.3-master as of today (2.3.devel (3a6537d59)). I haven't been able to narrow the problem down to a specific commit. The best I have been able to get to is that this commit is relatively good (not perfect but good enough): d9a1a7cbec19f4c6a47add47688351f8c3a0e372 (from Feb 19, 2018) whereas this commit:

> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: > > Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > >> Checking in - this is still an issue with 2.3-master as of today (2.3.devel (3a6537d59)). > > That doesn't sound good, because I did hope that someone has been working on this issue ... > >> I haven't been

On 1/06/2018 2:47 AM, Michael Grimm wrote: > On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >>> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >>> >>> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication

Hi Timo, Yes this seems to work fine so far. I?ll ask the people to add it to the current FreeBSD version.. Cheers Remko > On 6 Jun 2018, at 19:34, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > Should be fixed by https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/a952e178943a5944255cb7c053d970f8e6d49336 <https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/a952e178943a5944255cb7c053d970f8e6d49336> >