similar to: gpu lockup when using Hardware Acceleration in AndroVM in VirtualBox

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57326 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57326 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: gpu lockup when using hardware acceleration in AndroVM Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: thepouar at gmail.com Hardware: x86-64

there's a regression in the xf86-video-nouveau driver that came up in 1.0.3 that causes the desktop to bounce around in virtualbox whenever using HW acceleration in cinnamon and gnome 3, but not in fallback or cinnamon 2d, only happens in virtualbox and not the host, I've confirmed it was the graphics driver on the host because it happened with the 1.0.3 driver but not the 1.0.2.

I've tried emailing this to centos-tm at redhat.com , but mailer-daemon at googlemail.com sent me this Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: centos-tm at redhat.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain redhat.com by mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]. The error that

On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,

On 04/27/16 15:16, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: >> On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>>> one of the reasons being it

On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or

On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>> >>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56502 Priority: medium Bug ID: 56502 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: regression: gnome 3 & cinnamon desktop moves up and down in virtualbox QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62707 Priority: medium Bug ID: 62707 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: black screen in Simcity 3000 in wine Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: thepouar at gmail.com Hardware: Other Status: NEW

Hi, Clang crashes when below snippet of code is compiled (used latest svn version) *double func1() { double x ;* * asm ( "" : "=r"(x) : "0"(x) ); return x; }* > *clang -S test1.c* > *Assertion failed: (PartVT.isInteger() || PartVT == MVT::x86mmx) && ValueVT.isInteger() && "Unknown mismatch!", file

Hi All, I'm trying to compile clang+llvm on my desktop with cross-compiler to be able to work with llvm commands in ubuntu-arm image whithin gem5. If anybody has done this before I'd be so thankful to know the exact process and commands. I tried to configure llvm as follows but I couldn't get the arm-arm version correctly. To sum up, I need to cross-compile llvm for ARM to work in

Can the bitsPerSample be set any higher than 16? I try to set it to 20 or 24 and get this error... DarkIce: LameLibEncoder.h:122: specified bits per sample not supported [24] teststream# <p>When I start Darkice I get the following error for about 5 seconds and then it stops with "broken pipe". 08:57:09: BufferedSink, new peak: 53112 08:57:09: BufferedSink, remaining: 28808

Hmmm...I raised my sample rate to 44100 from 22050 and now it seems to be more stable??? >>> Matt@cmitech.com 8/28/02 9:04:47 AM >>> Can the bitsPerSample be set any higher than 16? I try to set it to 20 or 24 and get this error... DarkIce: LameLibEncoder.h:122: specified bits per sample not supported [24] teststream# <p>When I start Darkice I get the following error

Actually...I think it's because I set it to mono instead of stereo...anyway, is there a way to set the bitsPerSample higher? Matt <p><p>>>> Matt@cmitech.com 8/28/02 9:09:03 AM >>> Hmmm...I raised my sample rate to 44100 from 22050 and now it seems to be more stable??? >>> Matt@cmitech.com 8/28/02 9:04:47 AM >>> Can the bitsPerSample be set any

Looking back through the commits to llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h, I see a total backout of format related warnings in r56923 followed by the reapplication of r569065 with a fix (r56946)... -- llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h 2008/10/01 17:38:40 56923 +++ llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h 2008/10/02 06:16:08 56946 @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ %{!mmacosx-version-min=*:

Hi Michal I'm cc'ing -upsdev since you caught a good point! btw, sorry for the lag in this answer... 2012/10/29 Michal Hlavinka Hi, > > I finally found out enough time to prepare builds for Fedora. > Packages with nss can be found here: > http://mhlavink.fedorapeople.**org/nut+nss/<http://mhlavink.fedorapeople.org/nut+nss/> > > I had to apply this extra patch

Hi All, We're in the process of cleaning up the Hexagon backend as part of our maintenance effort. We're breaking down the changes into smaller chunks and will be sending these patches in the coming weeks for review/commit. We would appreciate your comments/feedback on any of these patches. Thanks, Jyotsna --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora

Hi I create a simple bytecode file with clang -c -emit-llvm test.c -o test.bc #include <stdio.h> void hello(){ printf("hello\n"); } void hello2(){ printf("hello2\n"); } Then i want to keep only the hello function so i do : llvm-extract -func=hello -o test2.bc test.bc but the string constants are removed and "@.str" is marked as external @str

Hi, I'm setting up an IMAP/POP cluster using dovecot director for some NFS reasons and I'm getting some troubles with director_servers directive. Configuration is shared on both nodes : director_servers = 10.0.50.50 10.0.50.51 director_mail_servers = 192.168.0.150 192.168.0.151 director_user_expire = 15 min service director { unix_listener login/director { mode = 0666 }

John, Thanks for your quick reply. Firstly, I'd like to employ a slicer for our benchmarking work (in one word, reducing the long-time irrelevant computing). I find the giri project and the LLVMSlicer[1]. However, the giri doesn't seem a complete implementation to me. I admit that I have not finished reading document/discussion, e.g. the previous threads in this mailing list. While the