similar to: Centos 5 mock seems to be broken

I accidentally enabled a repo, so my automatic yum upgrade installed a bunch of stuff and possibly broke yum. Is it possible to reverse this? Follow is the yum log of what got installed. Mar 04 01:34:04 Updated: libselinux.i386 1.23.10-1.99_3.el4.at Mar 04 01:34:04 Updated: popt.i386 1.10.2-15.1_58.el4.at Mar 04 01:34:04 Installed: libbeecrypt6.i386 4.1.2-9.2_11.el4.at Mar 04 01:34:04

I'm trying to build a custom RPM with a standalone Python 2.4.4 in the /opt directory to keep it isolated from the stock version of Python in CentOS 4.4. The end goal is to use it in conjunction with yet-to-be-built RPMS of the current versions of Zope and Plone. The spec file I've constructed allows me to build a RPM successfully, but when I try to install the RPM, it complains: error:

Hello, Yum won't update to version 2.4.2 Now version 2.4.0. is Installed. This is the output after a yum update: Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories update 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 extras 100%

Hi I'm using python24 under centos4 for a webware application. I downloaded it from atrpms repository some time ago. I'm installing a new VPS with centos4 64bit, and can't find any python24 package! python.org pyvault doesn't support 64 bit architectures, and atrpms don't make python24 packages anymore. I don't have 64 bit architecture at home so I can't recompile

Hello,Everybody, Now I am using R (D)COM Server from Python to manipulate some data. When I try to use "read.table" function to read some data, an error occurred. However these statements work well when they are input to R directly. It is so odd. The Python scripts are as the following, from win32com.client import Dispatch sc=Dispatch("StatConnectorSrv.StatConnector")

hello, I have install wine and i have installed CIV 4 BTS. the game civ 4 BTS has a good install and good working all game mode. The Pitboss worked correctly also. but when I launch civstat uploader : it bugged pitboss > Backtrace: > =>0 0x7bc4730f in ntdll (+0x3730f) (0x0032db60) > 1 0x7bc47586 in ntdll (+0x37586) (0x0032db80) > 2 0x7bc48996 RtlAllocateHeap+0xc6() in ntdll

Hi, I need to upgrade Python to at least 2.3.5, (but 2.4.3 would probably be better), to run Zope & Plone. Is it possible to replace the current version without breaking anything? or should I run two versions in parallel? What's the best way to go about doing this? Ben (please CC me in responses as I use digest)

Hello I would like to introduce free shell server shellmix.com. On shellmix.com you can get free shell account with big environment and with multiple IP addresses • HDD 200 MB • MySQL 10 MB • Proc 20 • WWW PHP, GD, Curl, Mod_Rewrite, htaccess, htpasswd • VirtualHost • Domain hosting • Mod_Rewrite • MAIL SMTP, POP3, SSL, TLS, Antivirus, Webmail • Python Python24, Python25,

Hi! I have gone a bit further with the installation of Python with Wine. I have downloaded http://www.dll-files.com/dllindex/dll-files.shtml?msvcirt and placed it in the .wine/drive_c/windows/system directory. And I have run msiexec /i python-2.4.msi within the .wine/drive_c directory. The Python setup windows pops up but when selecting the "Destination directory" I get the

Hi Guys, I would like advice for best practices to secure my linux boxes. Know if I have been hacked, know of security breaches, etc. Can anyone provide advice? -Jason

Hi, In my struggle today to get python2.4 installed on my CentOS4 system, I saw that it installed a packaged called alternatives which is supposed to handle symbolic links to default commands in a nice clean, structured way. However, I am having trouble understanding how this thing works. I have read the man page half a dozen times already, and yet the alternative link for python which was

I end up with the same error after building and running xen-stable 3.2-rc4 on both Ubuntu 7.10 and Fedora Core 6. I am using AMD64 builds. I have carefully followed the instruction on the xenbits.xensource.com on building Xen unstable. After booting with the new Xen and dom0 kernel, I cannot use any Xen tools (such as xm) from Dom0. I have tried restarting Xend but it fails with the same errors.

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

Just a general opinion question on idioms/common usage. Is it better to mock Ruby''s base classes, or to use real instances of those base classes? @string = mock String @string.stub!(:to_s).and_return "hello" # or: @string = "hello" I was wondering which is generally favored, and if so, for what reasons? Or is it highly dependent on the type of spec which is

I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386 versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64. Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with the following during configure /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found For the

On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. > In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: > config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the > rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not work. > > If I run "mock --debug-config

This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target for mock. Specifying --target=i386 or --arch-i386 both fail. Do we have to set up the

Am I correct in thinking that it''s not currently possible to have a method that creates a ''standard'' mock (i.e. a mock that has defaults useful in all contexts)? I''ve tried with the mock method and also by manually creating new Mock instances. I get failures when setting up expectations (undefined method ''receive'' for proc). Chris

On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. >> In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: >> config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the >> rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not

Hi, Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical" build environment to create those srpms in the first place. Am I right or did I get something terribly wrong? Cheers! -- Nux! www.nux.ro