similar to: Using if

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Using if"

2013 Jan 09
1
weighted factor analysis
hello there, I am trying to use a weight variable in a factor analysis but apparently the factanal command does not have a weight option. Any way to this? Thanks for your suggestions, V [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Nov 23
1
Joining two files
Hello all, I al trying to join (ADD FILES in SPSS) two files using the rbind() function. However, with rbind() R does not behave the same way as SPSS. I mean, it just concatenates the two blocs with no consideration for same variables if these are not in the same position in the two files. Anyone knows a function that performs the SPSS ADD FILES task? Thanks, V [[alternative HTML version
2012 Dec 11
1
Troubles with subset()
All, I have the attached dataset which I read from SPSS and transformed a little bit using the attached script. I am trying to run a logistic regression using glm() on a subset of my data. When I run the logistic regression on the whle dataset, it runs OK. As soon as I try to run on the subset, I get an error message related to different lengths of variables. Any idea why this might be so? Thanks
2013 Feb 11
1
Simple frequencies using svy design
Hello, excuse me if this is trivial. I have some survey data with the following design MyDesign<-(id=ident, weights=~fwgt, fcp=~nval1+nval2, data=hh_data1) I would like to run simple frequency tables such as those provided by the freq() function of rgrs to check the impact of the sampling design on my Ns. Anyway I can do this? thanks, V [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Jan 02
1
Extracting factors from "factanal"
Dear R users Happy New year to all for a start. Below is some data that I ran a factor analysis on. Using $score prints the scores for each of the three factors. However, I would like to access those factors as variable for new computations. How do I do that? In SPSS we just call fact1_1, fact2_1 etc.. Thanks for your suggestions. V ============ v1 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,4,5,6) v2
2013 Aug 29
3
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
It was happening in a few files using COFF.h in LLDB for the windows branch (Windows.h is required for some typedef over Mutex, thread, socket, etc...). As said before, I am currently checking if it could be avoided (probably some refactoring will be needed). However I was wondering if it might not be easier to just avoid this clash at all by avoiding it in LLVM. Alternatively I could #undef
2013 Aug 29
2
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
Right now, we have: In COFF.h: class COFF { enum MachineTypes { IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN = 0x0, ... }; }; In windows.h: #define IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN 0 * If you first include COFF.h and then windows.h, COFF::IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN will be preprocessed into COFF:0. * If you first include Windows.h and then COFF.h, COFF.h won't work because it's enum will
2013 Aug 28
3
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
Hello, I noticed that if include\llvm\Support is included alongside Windows.h, there will be many define conflict leading to compilation errors, such as: COFF.h (enum): enum MachineTypes { IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN = 0x0, ... }; and winnt.h (same but define): #define IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN 0 Of course I could try to avoid to include both (but it's rather difficult and would require
2013 Aug 29
0
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
On Aug 28, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote: > Right now, we have: > In COFF.h: > class COFF { enum MachineTypes { IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN = 0x0, ... }; }; > In windows.h: > #define IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN 0 > > * If you first include COFF.h and then windows.h, > COFF::IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN > will be
2013 Aug 29
0
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
In the Windows SDK headers, is the IMAGE_* defines in a separate file (e.g. winint.h)? Does the file have a guard against multiple inclusion? If so (and the guard was named _WINNT_H_), perhaps you can do something like: #define _WINNT_H_ #include <windows.h> So you would get everything except those file format defines. Of course, this would fail if other parts of the windows header rely
2013 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF documentation > is a feature, not a bug. > > The elf and
2013 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
The odds of #define _WINNT_H working are incredibly slim :) You can't include the separate headers (winbase.h etc), you have to just include windows.h Windows defines IMAGE_* whether we like it or not, we can't stop it doing it, so the only reasonable solution is to change LLVM to have it's own set of constant names. Nick Kledzik wrote: > In the Windows SDK headers, is the
2013 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF documentation is a feature, not a bug. The elf and macho headers in the same directory use the standard enumeration names, correct? On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that if include\llvm\Support is included alongside Windows.h, > there will be many
2014 Dec 31
3
[LLVMdev] First class aggregates of small size: split when used in function call
Hello, In my LLVM frontend (CLR/MSIL), I am currently using first-class aggregates to represent loaded value types on the "CLR stack". However, I noticed that when calling external method taking those aggregate by value, they were not passed as I expected: %COLORREF = type { i8, i8, i8, i8 } declare i32 @SetLayeredWindowAttributes(i8*, %COLORREF, i8, i32) I call this function with
2013 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict
On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. > It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). I too am in the camp that it is a feature to use the standard names. For instance doing a search it google or
2014 Nov 29
3
[LLVMdev] Frontend: How to use Member to Function Pointer as callbacks
Hello, As part of a MSIL (i.e. C#) to LLVM frontend I am currently working on ( https://github.com/xen2/SharpLang ), I would need some help/hint about how to properly design "PInvoke callbacks". Through "PInvoke" mechanism .NET allows you to call C functions, i.e.: C#: [DllImport("libc.so")] extern void mempcy(void* dest, void* src, int size); // declaration of C
2005 Feb 28
1
AMP with FC3
Hi All, Does anyone know if AMP can work with Fedora Core 3? I've tried to install AMP, and * on FC3, but found FOP failed to start when you use the command amportal start. Please advice if anyone got the solution. Chichi --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more. -------------- next part -------------- An
2008 Oct 27
2
Need help
Hi All, I am new comer here and for Statistics R. I want to know how to use R to calculate one way repeated measure ANOVA, for example, on three groups of data. I appreciate if someone can help me solve this problem. John
2010 Jun 02
11
HElP me I am a beginner
HY all, I am completely new to the asterisk so can any one help me with it as I have some questions queries 1. first n for most what are the tools/equipment that I need for eg a Computer, and a net connection is it all that I need for simple head start to get hands on the asterisk and cam please any one send me all the copies from vol 1 to vol 70 every issue Thank You and Best
2018 Mar 18
2
GSoC 2018
Hi Guys! I have a suggestion about the projects in idea section. Projects <http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#gsoc18> are listed as GSoC 2018 followed by GSoC 2017, I hope that some projects in the GSoC 2017 section are already taken by previous year gsoc students, could you please remove those projects from the list and include the remaining projects in GSoC 2018. Because one cannot make