similar to: Stepwise analysis with fixed variables

Dear R-experts, I am trying to bootstrap (and average) the median squared error evaluation metric for a robust regression. I can't get it. What is going wrong ? Here is the reproducible example. ############################# install.packages( "quantreg" ) library(quantreg) crp <-c(12,14,13,24,25,34,45,56,25,34,47,44,35,24,53,44,55,46,36,67) bmi

Hello, If you want to bootstrap a statistic, I suggest you use base package boot. You would need the data in a data.frame, see how you could do it. library(boot) bootMedianSE <- function(data, indices){ d <- data[indices, ] fit <- rq(crp ~ bmi + glucose, tau = 0.5, data = d) ypred <- predict(fit) y <- d$crp median(y - ypred)^2 } dat <-

I forgot, you should also set.seed() before calling boot() to make the results reproducible. Rui Barradas On 5/22/2018 10:00 AM, Rui Barradas wrote: > Hello, > > If you want to bootstrap a statistic, I suggest you use base package boot. > You would need the data in a data.frame, see how you could do it. > > > library(boot) > > bootMedianSE <- function(data,

Hello, Right! I copied from the OP's question without thinking about it. Corrected would be bootMedianSE <- function(data, indices){ d <- data[indices, ] fit <- rq(crp ~ bmi + glucose, tau = 0.5, data = d) ypred <- predict(fit) y <- d$crp median((y - ypred)^2) } Sorry, rui Barradas On 5/22/2018 11:32 AM, Daniel Nordlund wrote: > On 5/22/2018

Hi there, >library(faraway) >pima pregnant glucose diastolic triceps insulin bmi diabetes age test 1 6 148 72 35 0 33.6 0.627 50 1 2 1 85 66 29 0 26.6 0.351 31 0 >data(pima) >pima pregnant glucose diastolic triceps insulin bmi diabetes age test 1 6 148 72 35 0 33.6

On 5/22/2018 2:32 AM, Rui Barradas wrote: > bootMedianSE <- function(data, indices){ > ???? d <- data[indices, ] > ???? fit <- rq(crp ~ bmi + glucose, tau = 0.5, data = d) > ???? ypred <- predict(fit) > ???? y <- d$crp > ???? median(y - ypred)^2 > } since the OP is looking for the "median squared error", shouldn't the final line of the

I'm attempting to select a model using stepAIC. I want to use a forward selection procedure. I have specified a "scope" option, but must not be understanding how this works. My results indicate that the procedure begins and ends with the "full" model (i.e., all 17 independent variables)...not what I expected. Could someone please point out what I'm not

 Hi, Is there any function available to do stepwise selection of variables in Conditional(matched) logistic regression( clogit)? step, stepwise  etc are failing in case of conditional logistic regression. Please help.  Thanks P.T. Subha [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi everyone, I am wondering if there exists a stepwise regression function for the Bayesian regression model. I tried googling, but I couldn't find anything. I know "step" function exists for regular stepwise regression, but nothing for Bayes. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayesian-regression-stepwise-function--tp26013725p26013725.html Sent from

Sorry, I have wrote a wrong subject in the first email! Regards, Linda ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: linda Porz <linda.porz@gmail.com> Date: 2011/5/25 Subject: combined odds ratio To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch Dear all, I am looking for an R function which does stepwise selection cox model in r (delta chisq likelihood ratio test) similar

Hi, S-PLUS includes the function "stepwise" which can use a variety of methods to conduct stepwise multiple linear regression on a set of predictors. Does a similar function exist in R? I'm having difficulty finding one. If there is one it must be under a different name because I get an error message when I try 'help(stepwise)' in R. Thanks for your help, Andy Taylor

Hello, I want to know how to perform stepwise elimination of variables to svyglm thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I have encountered a problem when perform stepwise regression. The dataset have more 9 independent variables, but 7 observation. In R, before performing stepwise, a lm object should be given. fm <- lm(y ~ X1 + X2 + X3 + X11 + X22 + X33 + X12 + X13 + X23) However, summary(fm) will give: Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom Multiple R-Squared: 1, Adjusted

Hello, I have a question pertaining to the stepwise regression which I am trying to perform. I have a data set in which I have 14 predictor variables accompanying my response variable. I am not sure what the difference is between the function "mle.stepwise" found in the wle package and the functions "step" or "stepAIC"? When would one use

Dear all, I am wondering why the step() procedure in R has the description 'Select a formula-based model by AIC'. I have been using Stata and SPSS and neither package made any reference to AIC in its stepwise procedure, and I read from an earlier R-Help post that step() is really the 'usual' way for doing stepwise (R Help post from Prof Ripley, Fri, 2 Apr 1999 05:06:03

Dear list, I wanna select the significant variables relative to bird distribution, using stepwise method. However, the result is always the best-fit model. Please kindly suggest if it is possible to show the selection process. Thank you Elaine [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I would like to fit a linear model where some but not all explanators are chosen stepwise - ie I definitely want to include some terms, but others only if they are deemed significant (by AIC or whatever other approach is available). For example if I wanted to definitely include x1 and x2, but only include z1 and z2 if they are significant, something like this: df <-

I am using stepAIC for stepwise regression modeling. Is there a way to change the entry and exit alpha levels for the stepwise regression using stepAIC ? Many thanks, Berthold Berthold Stegemann Bakken Research Center Maastricht The Netherlands [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era indicato... Nome: non disponibile Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070321/1c8f6e74/attachment.pl

Dear Gurus, Thank you in advance for your assistance. I'm trying to understand scope better when performing stepwise regression using "step." I have a model with a binary response variable and 10 predictor variables. When I perform stepwise regression I define scope=.^2 to allow interactions between all terms. But I am missing something. When I perform stepwise regression (both