similar to: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Remove duplicate inclusion of linux/vhost.h

Hi Sachin, Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to commit it in the next few days. I will let you know as soon as it goes in to the mainline. Regards, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > Hi Lang, > > Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you > got any opportunity to

Hi Lang, Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you got any opportunity to work on the solution for this. Regards Sachin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:00 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Crash

Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, should take care of this bug. Please let me know how it works out for you. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to > commit it in the next few days. I

Hello all, I am a newbie at R, with some experience in PERL. I have a database table that contains the following data: Name | Score ======= | ===== Sachin T | 25 Sachin T | 53 Sachin T | 57 Sachin T | 34 Rahul D | 38 Rahul D | 31 Rahul D | 53 Ricky P | 7 Ricky P | 45 Ricky P | 27 Ricky P | 17 Ricky P | 86 Ricky P | 48 Jacques K | 23 Jacques K | 86 Jacques K | 32 I

Hi Sachin, The declaration of functions called via the "call" instruction is a GlobalValue in your Module. You can go through all of the GlobalValues, look for those that are Function declarations (use the "Function::isDeclaration()" method), and then placing them in the appropriate place in your assembly file. Would that work? -bw On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:23 AM,

Thanks Lang! I think we can use linear scan as work around for short term. Thanks for your help. Regards Sachin > -----Original Message----- > From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM > To: Sachin Punyani - I00202 > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator > > Hi Sachin, >

Here's a skeletal example. Embellish as needed: p <- 5 n <- 300 set.seed(1) dat <- cbind(rnorm(n), matrix(runif(n * p), n, p)) write.table(dat, file="c:/temp/big.txt", row=FALSE, col=FALSE) xtx <- matrix(0, p + 1, p + 1) xty <- numeric(p + 1) f <- file("c:/temp/big.txt", open="r") for (i in 1:3) { x <- matrix(scan(f, nlines=100), 100,

Hi, Probably I did not mention my question correctly. I need to emit declarations of the libcalls (that are made in the current module) at the beginning of the assembly file. The class "Module" does not maintain any list of the libcalls made during the program. Although, it maintains lists of all the global variables and functions in the current module. Traversing each

Did you get a chance to debug the issue? Thanks & Regards, Sachin Soman On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 11:10 PM Sachin Soman <sachonline.soman@gmail.com> wrote: > I have tried the same tests using the "test" driver, and that works > perfectly; no errors seen. > > Thanks & Regards > Sachin Soman > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:03 PM Daniel P.

> Hi Sachin, > > The declaration of functions called via the "call" instruction is a > GlobalValue in your Module. You can go through all of the > GlobalValues, look for those that are Function declarations (use the > "Function::isDeclaration()" method), and then placing them in the > appropriate place in your assembly file. > > Would that work? Hi

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Bill Wendling > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 4:38 AM > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > > What changes would be required in LLVM to support illegal pointer type? > > > Hi Sachin, >

Thank you Mr. Tim. I was wondering if you can tell me in which file 'get()' is defined. I am having trouble using this function. For example if I write 'get(AArch64::LDRXui)' then there is an error generated which says: use of undeclared identifier 'get'. Thanks again !! On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi

Hi Sachin, Confirmed: This is being caused by a subtle issue in the heuristic PBQP solver. Specifically: R1/R2 reductions as currently implemented can, on rare occasions, lead to the heuristic solver failing to find a finite cost solution, even though one exists. The infinite cost solution will always be in violation of some rule of register allocation (failing to handle an interference, or

I am assuming a 16-bit value will be stored in a pair of 8-bit registers? If so, add pseudo register which represent pairs of 8-bit registers. Add them to a pseudo register class. This allows you to mark i16 "legal". The difficult part is then to figure out how to lower these 16-bit operations into 8-bit ones. You probably need to custom lower a bunch of them with target

Respected Dr. Criswell, My problem is that the output of following code looks nothing like any opcode: *for(MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ) { MachineInstr *mi = I; int op = mi->getOpcode(); std::cout << op << '\t'; }* I need to identify specific instructions in my MachineFunctionPass and I was hoping that I can

>I am assuming a 16-bit value will be stored in a pair of 8-bit > registers? One related question is how to make sure that the correct register pair is allocated to the16-bit quantity when using two 8-bit operations. In other words, how we can make sure that the 16-bit pointer is stored into [AH, AL] and not in [AH, BL] ? i.e. GR8 = [ AH, BH, AL, BL]; GR16 = [AX, BX] ; // AX, BX

Thank you Mr. Tim. Is "AArch64" a namespace? Because when I tried "X86::MOV", it gave me an error saying that first define X86 namespace. Sorry if I sound stupid but I am new to LLVM. Thank you again. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > > int op = mi->getOpcode(); > > This is

Note: A couple of times I have seen errors while closing the connection (the trace ending with virFree). Also, a few times I have seen backtraces which show the flow going via esx driver and finally failing to close connection. Unfortunately I dont have those logs anymore. The execution results I have shared have been obtained using Libvirt built from source using the following config parameters:

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > What changes would be required in LLVM to support illegal pointer type? > Hi Sachin, The question's a bit broad. And I don't think the answer you want is as simple as "don't run the legalizer" (which probably won't work). Do you have a more specific question? -bw

See MachineOperand.h. If a MachineOperand represents an external symbol, getSymbolName() returns a string. Evan On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to print some extra information about libcall names in > assembly. Libcall names are managed as ExternalSymbols in LLVM. > > How do I access these ExternalSymbols from