similar to: FYI: News about Mark Crispin

If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit quiet there after the initial rush. Begin forwarded message: > From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm.com> > Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT > To: ietf-imapext at imc.org, morg at ietf.org > Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List > > At the MORG BOF, a discussion as to if the proposed IMAP

Hi, If I understand the thread sorting algorithm correctly (from draft-ietf-imapext-sort-17.txt and the code), it will sort like this (where I use numbers instead of dates with higher numbers being newer mails) 4 10 3 11 2 12 1 13 etc into all the lower levels. Thunderbird will actually sort this like this: 1 13 2 12 3 11 4 10 where threads are sorted by the newest child in

Someone should at least mention that they should support the real SPECIAL-USE instead of just Gmail-specific XLIST.. Begin forwarded message: > From: Andrew Laurence <atlauren at me.com> > Subject: [imapext] MS asks for feedback on standards support in Outlook/Exchange > Date: 1. kes?kuuta 2013 1.18.42 UTC+3.00 > To: HIED-EMAILADMIN at LISTSERV.ND.EDU, windows-hied at

'Father' of the IMAP protocol. Died Dec 28. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Crispin Had a TOPS-20 in his basement that did a great job of keeping the house warm in the cool months (I remember one BAR bof where he extoled the benefits of this form of home heating).

I have two servers in two different locations. Neither what you would call 100 percent safe from being turned off. Most staff use web based email. This backs onto imap server. I do know I will have to deal with contact lists and other items. in that client. Worst part is the link between them may get broken so both servers may be receiving email and back active at the same time. I can see 1

Dear Timo, Posted this originally to the squirrelmail list but they said that sorting is done server side so concluded I needed to talk to you: ============= I feel there is an error in the logic of the sort by From column. If you sort by this column, the messages are re-ordered in alphabetical order using the *email address* as the sorted word. However most people these days have their

This messages has been posted on SquirrelMail development mailing list. Maybe someone is interested in morg mailing list. Ciao, luigi -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [SM-DEVEL] An invitation to the "morg" (Message Organization) mailing list Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:08:03 +0300 To: squirrelmail-devel at lists.sourceforge.net Hello all, [Note: Yes, I'm not gone

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz.sig * IDLE: Interval between mailbox change notifies is now 1 second, because some clients keep a long-running IDLE connection and use other connections to actually read the mails. * SORT: If Date: header is missing or broken, fallback to using INTERNALDATE (as the SORT draft

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz.sig * IDLE: Interval between mailbox change notifies is now 1 second, because some clients keep a long-running IDLE connection and use other connections to actually read the mails. * SORT: If Date: header is missing or broken, fallback to using INTERNALDATE (as the SORT draft

Hi folks, there's an extension [1] to IMAP specifying the THREAD command to return list of message sequence numbers grouped to indicate the threading of them. That draft currently defines two algorithms, one of them based solely on Subjects (which is rather dumb) and the second one, combining Subjects with In-Reply-To (etc) headers. The second method is actually advertised and supported by

Hi, I've got a quick question about file permissions and packages... I'm creating my own package, and am having problems with its vignette not being seen when I install it into R... As I understand it, the permissions of the source tree should be as follows: o Directories - drwxrwxr-- o Files - -rw-r--r-- Everything builds and runs through 'R CMD check' fine with

Dovecot (0.9.11) consumes 100% CPU utilisation when accessing (either pop or imap) one of my mailboxes. It doesn''t happen with other mailboxes. The mailbox has about 500 mails while others have many more. They are all in mbox format. OS: OpenBSD-3.5 with all patches MTA: Sendmail-8.12.11 It happened with other RCs of dovecot-0.9.11 Configured as: ./configure --without-pam

http://dovecot.org/rc/ Changes since rc1: + Create PID file in /var/run/dovecot/master.pid - THREAD and SORT commands crashed with some mails If nothing new comes up, this is the final release tomorrow. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

Hi, Forgive a very basic question... I need to take two lists-of-lists, and apply a function to each pair of elements in the lists to return a single list... For example l1 <- list(1:5,6:10,2:15) l2 <- list(1:8,4:12,1:19,4:20) I could easily do an lapply across each of them, but is there a function that does a sort-of pairwise-apply across both together? Does anybody know of a good

Dear all, we have an exciting PhD position applying HPC to the analysis of large scale cancer datasets. The post will suit an applicant from a strong computational background who wishes to apply their knowledge to help develop a better understanding of the processes that control how tumours develop. Details below:- High Performance Computing applied to cancer research: Computational analysis of

Hi, I've got a quick question about what happens when indexing into matrices with a single column. I was wondering if anyone can help ... For example: > x <- matrix(1:10) > y <- cbind(x,x) > x[4:6,] [1] 4 5 6 > y[4:6,] [,1] [,2] [1,] 4 4 [2,] 5 5 [3,] 6 6 > class(x[4:6,]) [1] "integer" > class(y[4:6,]) [1] "matrix" It seems that R

>> I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a million pairs > ... and let me guess: everything is significiant to an almost arbitrary > value of \alpha? :-) For each of quarter of a million sets, I do a wilcoxon between two pairs each containing twenty numbers... I do this 12 times... > > (and takes about 3 hours). I've replaced the

Hello, I want to create a new variable which includes 4 age categories in this way: if (age>=12 && age<32) age1==1 if (age>=32 && age<52) age1==2 if (age>=52 && age<72) age1==3 if (age>=72 && age<100) age1==4 but I get the results only for the first observation. how can I apply this condition to all observations? Thanks in advance,

Thanks - it is indeed the first '.' that's the problem... Crispin > -----Original Message----- > From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com] > Sent: 07 October 2003 15:21 > To: Crispin Miller > Subject: RE: [R] .First.lib doesn't appear to be running after calling > lib rary() > > > I put .First.lib in the file "zzz.R", and it works for

Hi, I decided to upgrade to 1.8 today... :-) Anyway, we are writing our own package that is dependent on a bioconductor library - 'affy'. I've checked and when I fire up R, library(affy) behaves as expected... so it all seems to be installed and OK... In the DESCRIPTION file in my package source I have the line: Depends: affy When I run R CMD check simpleaffy I get to: ... *