similar to: [Bug 9407] New: rsync transfers cause zero window packets

On 06/07/2016 05:05 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: >> >> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all > cases firewall-config is not functional. >> >> First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on > one, it don't change to

After successfully updating three CentOS 6.3 VM guests to 6.4 I decided to update the host as well. And it failed to boot. Kernel panic - Not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Pid: 1, comm: init not tainted: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Plus a call trace I couldn't see Luckily I was able to boot from the previous kernel and get my system back up. After booting to the previous kernel I

I understand that the contents of /etc/sysctl.conf should be read and executed at system startup. However that never happens and I have to run sysctl -p after every reboot to get the settings I want. This is happening on every CentOS machine and VM I have. I can see in the startup scripts that "sysctl -e -p /etc/sysctl.conf >/dev/null 2>&1" is run at start up by the

I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. _default/relationship123.com./IN: file not found If I change the zone defs to include the full path: >From zone "relationships123.com." IN { type master; file

I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all cases firewall-config is not functional. First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on one, it don't change to "checked", and nothing changes on the firewall. However you do see a "Changes applied" Sometimes, f you go to permanent mode and attempt to edit a zone, the whole

First system-config-network is not part of CentOS/RHEL 6, now I don't see system-config-bind either. Is there an alternative (GUI) way to manage the bind DNS server? Emmett

I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6). Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the process and was able to boot that VM, so I went ahead with updating the host and the two VMs that were in use. When I rebooted the host none of the VM would start. Once I figured out that it

I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version 3.0.6. Since then backups have been failing for some targets. The failure is a TCP ZeroWindow issue. It looks like the server rsync process cannot empty it's buffer soon enough and eventually the process fails. I really do not know if it is

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

For some time I have been seeing disk errors in the syslog every seven days. Until today it always happens Sunday morning at 8:13 AM, plus or minus a minute or two. Yesterday it happened at 1:13 AM. Here are the pertinent log entries for the latest occurrence: Jan 6 01:12:29 g2 kernel: ata9.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Jan 6 01:12:29 g2 kernel: ata9.00: BMDMA stat

On Jan 5, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: > > zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found > zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. > _default/relationship123.com./IN: file not found [snip] Just

On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all cases firewall-config is not functional. > > First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on one, it don't change to "checked", and nothing changes on the firewall. However you do see

On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network connections are static. There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If there is no network connection, your server's network

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> > wrote: >> >> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network >> connections are static. > > There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one > big one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If

On 06/07/2016 04:46 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: >> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network connections are static. > There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If there is

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

I just switched to Mongrel, and it''s been working much better than my previous lighttpd/fastcgi setup. So thanks for the awesomeness. My current problem: once or twice an hour, I get following error in production Mongrel timed out this thread: too many open files I never get it in testing or on our staging server. Any ideas what would cause that? It doesn''t *appear*

On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: > > > Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.? I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations.? Still

I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It this in the IN_public chain: Chain IN_public (2 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 81 3423 IN_public_log all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 81 3423 IN_public_deny all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the