similar to: samba4 ad problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "samba4 ad problems"

2019 May 18
0
self compiled 4.10.3 replication failure.
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an > existing samba AD domain that has 2 existing DCs. One of the existing DCs is > running 4.8.7 and the other is running 4.7.7. Everything looks OK except > that when I run samba-tool drs showrepl on
2019 May 20
0
self compiled 4.10.3 replication failure.
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:33 PM <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an > >> existing samba
2013 Nov 28
1
Replicating failing after installing RODC
We've joined an RODC to the domain (Windows 2008R2 running a W2003 FFL/DFL AD) but are getting these errors on first startup. It was joined with: samba-tool domain join main.adlab.netdirect.ca RODC --realm=main.adlab.netdirect.ca --username=administrator at main.adlab.netdirect.ca --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ but we get these errors right after startup: Nov 28 12:35:27 sles-bree samba[3939]:
2017 May 08
2
Second DC won't start LDAP daemon
Hello. I've got a network of FreeBSD servers which traditionally hosted a classic domain. I upgraded some months ago, removing the old PDC and BDC and migrating to an AD DC controller in a jail. This is working fine with Samba 4.4.13. Now I'm trying to add a second DC, so I created a new jail on another physical server and went on with the setup, following: >
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
Yep, I did. SPN of newly added DC were missing on all DC except for the newly added DC. I expect SPN are created on joined DC then replicated on others DCs. Adding SPN for that newly added DC in DIT of FSMO owner does not helped much. Now the error is coming repetitively in newly added DC is: [2015/11/16 16:49:42.529374, 0]
2019 May 15
2
self compiled 4.10.3 replication failure.
Hi, I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an existing samba AD domain that has 2 existing DCs. One of the existing DCs is running 4.8.7 and the other is running 4.7.7. Everything looks OK except that when I run samba-tool drs showrepl on the new DC (VDC4) I get the following output: (vdc4 pts4) # samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\VDC4 DSA Options:
2014 Sep 23
1
Replication Failure
I have 2 DCs running 4.1.12 that have stopped replicating and are producing these error messages: from dc1: Failed to commit objects: WERR_GENERAL_FAILURE/NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE [2014/09/23 10:43:35.530000, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1646(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsGetNCChanges) ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1646: DsGetNCChanges 2nd replication on
2017 Dec 12
2
DNS replication only working one way
I'm hoping this is the last issue I run into with bringing this new DC online. DNS replication is currently only working in one direction, from my old DC to my new DC. Items added or changed in the RSAT of my new DC don't ever make it over to the old DC. I have turned up samba logging on each side to 3, and you can see the logs below from the time I created a record on the new DC
2020 May 22
2
Attribute or value exists during LDB_RENAME
Hello, After removing a distribution group in AD (on a Windows DC) yesterday, there're a lot of such errors in samba-dc (4.12.2) since then: [2020/05/22 13:19:04.200747, 1] ../../source4/dsdb/repl/replicated_objects.c:904(dsdb_replicated_objects_commit) Failed to apply records: Failed to locally apply remote rename from CN=videdom,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com to
2017 Jun 13
2
skip chunk if "DRS linked attribute for GUID - DN not found"
Hello everyone, i try to use Samba RODC(4.6.5) with W2K8R2. Windows AD has around 35000 objects. My Samba machine is small one (ARM 32bit CPU) with only 2GB physical memory, so i can’t join to the domain because of expensive memory usage. To solve this Problem, i decide to replicate only critical objects and then let samba_kcc to get other objects. 1 ) Is this an possible way to use Samba AD or
2019 May 20
4
self compiled 4.10.3 replication failure.
On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an >> existing samba AD domain that has 2 existing DCs. One of the existing DCs is >> running 4.8.7 and the other is running
2015 Nov 16
2
No more replication for new DC
Hi all, I have 3 DCs running Samba 4.3.1 in the same domain. They seem to work quiet well with coherent databases on each of them. After rebuilding my RPM to include systemd units, I've joined a Samba 4.3.1 today, using --domain-critical-only. The join was successful, the replication was not. This DC has only 146 objects in the DB when it should have a bit less than 50000 objects. As I was
2018 Jan 16
0
AD replication problem "WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED" - need help debugging
Hi Heinz, > i have the same problem on samba 4.7.3 and 4.7.4. > I start with 2 DCs and the sync works fine. After the join of a third > DC mostly i get the WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED. I tested it for 10 > times. > > in my case i have: > DC1 (with any FSMO Roles) > DC2 > > new join as DC: > DC3 > > After the join, the sync from DC2 to DC3 fails. > >
2015 Nov 16
2
No more replication for new DC
On 16/11/15 15:09, mathias dufresne wrote: > That did not work. I've added DNS entries mentioned in that wiki page. I > also forced creation of all entries mentioned by samba_dnsupdate > --all-names --verbose. > So I expect all needed DNS entries are present. If some are still missing > they are not mentioned by samba_dnsupdate. And as samba_dnsupdate job is to > create
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
Another error coming often: [2015/11/16 15:11:07.592598, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:745(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for
2015 Nov 16
2
No more replication for new DC
On 16/11/15 14:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > Another error coming often: > [2015/11/16 15:11:07.592598, 0] > ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:745(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) > Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for >
2015 Nov 16
0
No more replication for new DC
That did not work. I've added DNS entries mentioned in that wiki page. I also forced creation of all entries mentioned by samba_dnsupdate --all-names --verbose. So I expect all needed DNS entries are present. If some are still missing they are not mentioned by samba_dnsupdate. And as samba_dnsupdate job is to create missing DNS entries, I dare rely on it. I expect the issue comes from missing
2020 May 22
2
Attribute or value exists during LDB_RENAME
>> After removing a distribution group in AD (on a Windows DC) yesterday, there're >> a lot of such errors in samba-dc (4.12.2) since then: >> [2020/05/22 13:19:04.200747, 1] ../../source4/dsdb/repl/replicated_objects.c:904(dsdb_replicated_objects_commit) >> Failed to apply records: Failed to locally apply remote rename from CN=videdom,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com to
2015 Feb 04
1
Samba4 - Corrupted group caused stop of replication - "Object class violation"
Hi Samba List! We are using Samba Version 4.1.12 on two master DC. We've noticed that a corrupted group has been created, we tried to delete it, and since then, the replication fail between the two DC. The result of the command : "samba-tool drs showrepl" is the following : On the first DC, INBOUND NEIGHBORS : Last attempt @ Wed Feb 4 11:26:41 2015 CET failed, result 58
2016 Aug 19
0
User accounts being blocked
Are you using the "samba-tool domain passwordsettings" command to set the lockout policy, or are you using group policy? -James Crouch On Aug 19, 2016 2:03 PM, "Ricardo Pardim Claus" <ricardo.claus at yahoo.com.br> wrote: > > > Dear James, > Thanks for the input. > > Even increasing from 5 to 10, the amount of times to miss the password and > lock