similar to: how to specify random effects on intercepts for mlogit?

I am new to R but I have managed to use mlogit to run multivariate logit models successfully. My data violates the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives assumption and now I would like to run a mixed logit model. It is a "wide" data set with 9 independent (individual) variables and three choices (variable Y). The database is in a cvs file called CAU. This is the code I have run

mgcv: Constructing probabilities for binomial GAM with crossed random intercepts and factor by variable Hello, (I'm sorry if this has been discussed elsewhere; I may not have been looking in the right places.) I ran a binomial GAM in which "Correct" is modelled in terms of the participant's age and the modality in which the stimulus is presented (written vs spoken).

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

Can you provide the summary(m2) results? > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Pickett [mailto:S.Pickett at exeter.ac.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:14 AM > To: Doran, Harold > Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: [SPAM] - RE: [R] REML with random slopes and random > intercepts giving strange results - Bayesian Filter detected spam > > Hi again,

Hi everyone, I have been using REML to derive intercepts and coeficients for each individual in a growth study. So the code is m2 <- lmer(change.wt ~ newwt+(newwt|id), data = grow) Calling coef(model.lmer) gives a matrix with this information which is what I want. However, as a test I looked at each individual on its own and used a simple linear regression to obtain the same information, then

Hello,  I am pretty new to mlogit, and still trying to figure out what models to use.I have a data set of N individuals, each of which faces I alternatives. The utility function of individual n, for choice i is:  u(i,n) = alpha(i) * x1(i,n) + beta * x2(i,n)  where alpha(i) is the individual specific parameter, and beta is shared among all individuals. I don't really know how to set this up

Dear R-group, Could somebody recommend a package that can deal with a multinomial response variable (choice of breeding tactic in mice, which has four unordered levels), multiply-imputed data (generated using the Amelia package) and two non-nested random effects: individual identity (133 individuals made up to four choices each) and year (for which there are six levels and sample size varies

I'm running some multi-level binomial models with lme4 and have a question regarding the estimated random effects. Suppose I have nested data e.g. clinic and then patient within clinic. The standard deviations of the random effects at each level are roughly equal in a model for real life data. Attention then turns to examining the individual random effects at each level. I'm extracting

Hi all: I perform the linear mixed model for 300 persons, y is CD4 count,x is time. I randomized slope and intercept,so I can get 300 slopes and 300 intercepts.Now I wanna test wheter the variance of 300 slopes and 300 intercepts differs from zero. If the variance of 300 slopes(or intercepts) differs from zero at 0.05 significant level,I should randomize the slope(or intercept), and if not,I

I am learning five mlogits as follows v1.model<-mlogit(v1~1|v2+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v1.data, reflevel="1") v2.model<-mlogit(v2~1|v1+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v2.data, reflevel="1") v3.model<-mlogit(v3~1|v1+v2+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v3.data, reflevel="1") v4.model<-mlogit(v4~1|v1+v2+v3+v5, data=mlogit.v4.data, reflevel="1")

Dear professor, I'm using package nlme, but I can't find a way to specify two uncorrelated random effects. For example, a random intercept and a random slope. In package lme4, we can specify&nbsp;x + (x ll g) to realize, but how in nlme? Thanks! ???????????????????????? Zhen Wang Graduate student, Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen

I am running rsync version 2.56 in daemon mode on a server running Redhat 8.0. When I check my log file (located in /var/log/rsyncd.log), the only lines I see have to do with the server starting up, like so: 2003/09/11 16:53:42 [15025] rsyncd version 2.5.6 starting, listening on port 873 I would like to see output relating to connections, usernames etc., so I set up the following rsyncd.conf

I want to fit a random effects model with two separate nested random effects. I can easily do this using the `lmer` package in R. Here's how: model<-lmer(y ~ 1 + x + (1 | oid/gid) + (1 | did/gid), data=data) Here, I'm fitting a random intercept for `oid` nested within `gid` and `did` nested within `gid`. This works well. However, I want to fit a model where the variance of the

I am trying to follow this example for multinomial logistic regression http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.htm However, I cannot get it to work properly. This is the output I get, and I get an error when I try to use the mlogit function. Any ideas as to why this happens? > mydata <- read.csv(url("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.csv")) > attach(mydata) >

I saw different specifications for Random Effects and I'm confused about the use of "/" and the use of "(0+...|)" . Let say we have a nested structure where some countries have some several plants in different states and we measure the reaction to a drug. The list of Countries = USA, France, Italy The States for USA = Michigan, Florida, California The States for France

Hello: Has anyone tried to model-based recursive partition (using mob from package party; thanks Achim and colleagues) a data set based on a multinomial logit model (using mlogit from package mlogit; thanks Yves)? I attempted to do so, but there are at least two reasons why I could not. First, in mob I am not quite sure that a model of class StatModel exists for mlogit models. Second, as

I've been working on a multinomial logit model, trying to predict vegetation types as a function of total phosphorus. Previous responses to my postings have pointed me to the mlogit package. I'm now trying to work examples and my data using this package. data("Fishing", package = "mlogit") Fish <- mlogit.data(Fishing, varying = c(4:11), shape = "wide",

I'm trying to fit a multinominal logistic model using package mlogit. I have 15 independent variables. The code looks like this: m<-mlogit(score~0|f1+f2+f3+f4+f5+f6+f7+f8+f9+f10+f11+f12+f13+f14+f15, data, reflevel="1") And it gives the following error message: Error in parse(text = x) : unexpected ')' in "score ~ 0 + alt:(f1 + f2 + f3 + f4 + f5 + f6 + f7 + f8 + f9

Hello, I've been getting the following error when using the mlogit function from the mlogit package This is one of the examples provided in the Package "mlogit" January 27, 2010 description data("Fishing", package="mlogit") Fish <- mlogit.data(Fishing, varying = c(4:11), shape="wide", choice="mode") summary(mlogit(mode ~ pr + ca - 1,