similar to: rq summary plot: specify ylim for each coefficient

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "rq summary plot: specify ylim for each coefficient"

2009 Jan 09
5
grep : escape "*"
Dear R useRs, Sorry for this foolish question, but I can't find how to escape the * character when using grep : > grep("-", c("/3", "2*3", "4-4")) [1] 3 > grep("/", c("/3", "2*3", "4-4")) [1] 1 > grep("*", c("/3", "2*3", "4-4")) Erreur dans grep("*",
2014 Jan 16
0
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:25:26 +1030 > Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >>> It looks like there's no need for those two fields: >>> >>> - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always
2014 Jan 15
0
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > It looks like there's no need for those two fields: > > - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always > equal to the vring size. > - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill, > we could check vq->num_free instead. > - rq->num was
2010 Feb 14
2
lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?
Hello, When drawing "barcharts", I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study > library(lattice) > panel.barchart but am unable to figure out where ylim is taken care of and how one might fix ylim[1] to 0 for barcharts ... Can anyone point out how to tackle this? Thanks, Joh
2014 Jan 15
2
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> It looks like there's no need for those two fields: >> >> - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always >> equal to the vring size. >> - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the
2014 Jan 15
2
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> It looks like there's no need for those two fields: >> >> - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always >> equal to the vring size. >> - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the
2014 Jan 16
2
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
It looks like there's no need for those two fields: - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always equal to the vring size. - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill, we could check vq->num_free instead. - rq->num was required to be increased or decreased explicitly after each get/put which results a
2014 Jan 16
2
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
It looks like there's no need for those two fields: - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always equal to the vring size. - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill, we could check vq->num_free instead. - rq->num was required to be increased or decreased explicitly after each get/put which results a
2013 Dec 27
2
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
It looks like there's no need for those two fields: - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always equal to the vring size. - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill, we could check vq->num_free instead. - rq->num was required to be increased or decreased explicitly after each get/put which results a
2013 Dec 27
2
[PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num
It looks like there's no need for those two fields: - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always equal to the vring size. - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill, we could check vq->num_free instead. - rq->num was required to be increased or decreased explicitly after each get/put which results a
2013 Feb 04
2
gettext weirdness
Hi, I am trying to use the gettext() function to translate some text. I have never used this function before, so, it's entirely possible that I am doing something wrong. The issue that I am encountering is that gettext() properly translates some text, but not some other. Natural language was compiled in my R (installed from the Debian repositories): $ R R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) --
2013 Feb 04
2
gettext weirdness
Hi, I am trying to use the gettext() function to translate some text. I have never used this function before, so, it's entirely possible that I am doing something wrong. The issue that I am encountering is that gettext() properly translates some text, but not some other. Natural language was compiled in my R (installed from the Debian repositories): $ R R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) --
2010 Nov 30
1
Zooming in to a ggplot (a sort of ylim, but ylim won't do)
Dear Helpers, I wonder whether you might be able to help me. I have a plot composed of ggplot (and a follow on geom_smooth call). I would like to restrict the display range of the y axis to a smaller range, a sort of zooming onto a region. I attempted to use ylim, but it will effect the range (i.e. effect the geom_smooth call). Is there any way that I can save the results up to geom_smooth call
2012 Jan 10
0
"tau + h > 1: error in summary.rq"
Dear all, I am doing a simulation for my model that works when I use only the rq() command. However, since I need to use the varcov matrix for my Wald test, I need to compute summary(rq(), cov=TRUE). But the simulation does not work because of the error: tau + h > 1: error in summary.rq I tried to use: if (tau + h > 1) stop("tau + h > 1: error in summary.rq") But the
2012 Sep 18
0
Comparing rqpd() and rq()
Dear R users, I am trying to estimate a panel data model using rqpd(). I also estimated the same model using rq() and dummy variables for the groups. The coefficient estimates differ substantially between the two approaches (rqpd() produces substantially larger coefficients). Should the two approaches deliver similar estimates (as for plm() and lm() plus dummies)? I.e. does this indicate a
2012 May 05
0
penalized quantile regression (rq.fit.lasso)
Dear all: I have a question about how to get the optimal estimate of coefficients using the penalized quantile regression (LASSO penalty in quantile regression defined in Koenker 2005). In R, I found both rq(y ~ x, method="lasso",lambda = 30) and rq.fit.lasso(x, y, tau = 0.5, lambda = 1, beta = .9995, eps = 1e-06) can give the estimates. But, I didn't find a way using either of
2008 Jul 10
1
problems with rq.fit.sfn
Dear all, I am running a quantile estimation with Sparse matrix and when I run the procedure rq.fit.sfn I receive the following warning: tiny diagonals replaced with Inf when calling blkfct. Does anyone knows exactly what does it mean? What's this kind of error? Should I get worried about this message? The matrix I use is a full rank matrix (and indeed I do not have any message about
2009 May 06
0
Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data. Warning message: In rq.fit.sfn
Dear Dimitris, I have exactly the same problem than you, Do you get some solution? Thanks, Lola Lola Gadea Profesora titular de Economía Aplicada/Lecturer in Applied Economics Universidad de Zaragoza/University of Zaragoza (Spain) lgadea@unizar.es <http://estructuraehistoria.unizar.es/personal/lgadea/index.html>http://estructuraehistoria.unizar.es/personal/lgadea/index.html Grupo de
2012 Jan 04
1
plot rq lm
Dear Community, I'd like to plot an rq object the same way I do with a lm one, is it possible? Something like this plot(rqmodel , 1:4, id.labels=rownames(pga1)); where rqmodel <- rq(log(vd) ~ v1 + log(v2) +log(v3) + v4 + v5 ,data =dat) Thanks in advance and apologies, I'm pretty newbie with this, user at host.com -- View this message in context:
2006 Oct 31
0
6321768 assertion failed: qprocsareon(rq) in strsubr.c:qattach()
Author: edp Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: d7daad0eb83a47ab60c177eae50451b604a452b8 Log message: 6321768 assertion failed: qprocsareon(rq) in strsubr.c:qattach() Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/specfs/specvnops.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pts.c