similar to: R-Square in WLS

Full_Name: Albrecht Gebhardt Version: 0.90.0 OS: Linux + Tru64 Submission from: (NULL) (143.205.61.72) This is where example(krige) from library(sgeostat) stops with R 0.90.0: krige> image(grid$x, grid$y, grid$krige$zhat, add = T) Error in length(x) == nrow(z) : comparison (1) is possible only for vector types in previous versions of R the above image() call worked, because image() did the

Oh yes. The "load package" under the "packages menu" in the Windows version does that. To check I typed "library(assist)" after starting R. Same behavior, ssr is found, but others like predict.ssr, and plot.ssr, give a "not found" message. Thanks for the suggestion. Mike

If I'm not mistaken, partial R-squared is the R^2 of the quantities plotted in a partial residual plot, so you can base the computation on that. Prof. Fox's `car' package on CRAN has a function for creating those plots, but you need to figure out the way to extract the quantities being plotted. [In any case, the basic tools for doing such computations are all in R, and it

Hey I'm not really sure what I should put on here, but I am having trouble with my R code. I am trying to get the p-values, R^2s etc for a number of different groups of variables that are all in one dataset. This is the code: #Stand counter st<-1 #Collections stands<-numeric(67) slopes<-numeric(67) intercepts<-numeric(67) mses<-numeric(67) rsquares<-numeric(67)

Dear list member, I struggle with the problem, why the probabilities of choosing one of three mutually exclusive alternatives don?t sum up to 1! Let?s assume we have three alternatives X, Y, and Z. Let?s further assume we know their respective utilities: uX, uY, uZ. I?m interested in calculating the probability of choosing X, Y, and Z. Since I assume that the alternatives are mutually

Hello, Is there a way to compare the relative relevance of fixed and random effects in mixed models? I have in mind measures of effect size in ANOVAs, and would like to obtain similar information with mixed models. Are there information criteria that allow to compare the relevance of each of the effects in a mixed model to the overall fit? Thank you, Bruno

Dear friends, I have written the following lines in R console wich already exist in pdf file systemfit: data( "GrunfeldGreene" ) library( "plm" ) GGPanel <- plm.data( GrunfeldGreene, c( "firm", "year" ) ) greeneSur <- systemfit( invest ~ value + capital, method = "SUR", + data = GGPanel ) greenSur I have obtained the following incomplete

Hello, I'm doing some linear regression: >lm<-lm(osas~alp,data) >summary(lm) However, the Rsquared in the output of summary() is not the same as the "standard" Rsquared calculated by spreadsheets, and outlined in statistical guidebooks, being SSR/SSTO. The output says "multiple Rsquared", but it is no multiple regression... What's the difference? Thanks,

Good morning to you all, Sorry for taking your time from your research and teaching schedules.   If you have a non-stationary univariate time Series data that has the transformation: Say; l.dat<-log (series) d.ldat<-diff (l.dat, differences=1) and you fit say arima model. predit.arima<-predict (fit.series, n.ahead=10, xregnew= (n+1) :( n+10)) How could I re-transform

Would someone be so kind as to explain in English what the ANOVA code (anova.lm) is doing? I am having a hard time reconciling what the text books have as a brute force regression and the formula algorithm in 'R'. Specifically I see: p <- object$rank if (p > 0L) { p1 <- 1L:p comp <- object$effects[p1] asgn <-

Hi Guys, stumped by a simple problem. I would like to take a file of the form Pair group param1 1 D 10 1 D 10 1 R 10 1 D 10 2 D 10 2 D 10 2 D 10 2 R 10 2 R 10 etc.. and for each pair, calculate the average of

Hi, everybody, 3 questions about R-square: ---------(1)----------- Does R2 always increase as variables are added? ---------(2)----------- Does R2 always greater than 1? ---------(3)----------- How is R2 in summary(lm(y~x-1))$r.squared calculated? It is different from (r.square=sum((y.hat-mean (y))^2)/sum((y-mean(y))^2)) I will illustrate these problems by the following codes:

The question was how to get the p-value from the fit below, as an S object sr<-survreg(s~groups, dist="gaussian") Coefficients: (Intercept) groups -0.02138485 0.03868351 Scale= 0.01789372 Loglik(model)= 31.1 Loglik(intercept only)= 25.4 Chisq= 11.39 on 1 degrees of freedom, p= 0.00074 n= 16 ---- In general, good places to start are > names(sr) >

I'm trying to fit a model to solve a biological problem. There are multiple independent variables, and also there are multiple responses. Each response is a function of all the independent variables, plus a set of parameters. All the responses depend on the same variables and parameters - just the form of the function changes to define each seperate response. Any ideas how I can fit

Dear Mac users, Hi, as you might have probably read the thread of "[R] Rsquared in summary(lm)" on May 10, it seems that Mac version of lm() seem to be working incorrectly. I enclose the script to produce the result both for lm() and manual calculation for a simple regression. Could you run the script and report with the version of R, so I don't have to go through every builds

Hi everyone, I have a question about calculating r-squared in R. I have tried searching the archives and couldn't find what I was looking for - but apologies if there is somewhere I can find this... I carried out a droughting experiment to test plant competition under limited water. I had: - 7 different levels of watering treatment (1 -7 - from most watered to least watered/) - 15

Hi people, I want to obtain the adjusted r-square given a set of coefficients (without the intercept), and I don't know if there is a function that does it. Exist???????????????? I know that if you make a linear regression, you enter the dataset and have in "summary" the adjusted r-square. But this is calculated using the coefficients that R obtained,and I want other coefficients

Does anyone know of a literature reference, or a piece of code that can help me calculate the amount of variation explained (R2 value), in a regression constrained to have a slope of 1 and an intercept of 0? Thanks! Sebastian J. Sebastián Tello Department of Biological Sciences 285 Life Sciences Building Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA, 70803 (225) 578-4284 (office and lab.)

Dear All, I am running a simulation to obtain coverage probability of Wald type confidence intervals for my parameter d in a function of two parameters (mu,d). I am optimizing it using "optim" method "L-BFGS-B" to obtain MLE. As, I want to invert the Hessian matrix to get Standard errors of the two parameter estimates. However, my Hessian matrix at times becomes

Hi there, Maybe people who know both R and econometrics will be able to answer my questions. I want to run panel regressions in R with fixed-effect. I know two ways to do it. First, I can include factor(grouping_variable) in my regression equation. Second, I plan to subtract group mean from my variables and run OLS panel regression with function lm(). I plan to do it with the second way because