similar to: [Bug 57151] New: repeatable nouveau driver crashes/hangs during resume on Dell Latitude E6510 when drm.debug=14

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57081 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57081 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: dell latitude laptop E6510 with nouveau and nvs3100 nvidia doesn't resume properly QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

Hello, On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >>>> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: ... >>>> Your special build gets the gateway working, but the downloaded InitRD >>>> still gets corrupted sometimes. Boot-time is down

> Hello, > > On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > >> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC > >>> address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from > >>>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello Ady, > > On 27.08.2014 16:46, Ady wrote: >>> On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 24.07.2014

Hello Ady, On 27.08.2014 16:46, Ady wrote: >> On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> >> wrote: >>>>>> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >> ... >>>>>> Your special build gets the gateway working, but the

> Hello, > > On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> > wrote: > >>>> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > ... > >>>> Your special build gets the gateway working, but the downloaded InitRD > >>>> still

> Is there something I can test or help to diagnose? What about 6.03-pre18 (or newer)? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ git.zytor.com/?p=syslinux/syslinux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master Regards, Ady.

> Hello, > > On 23.07.2014 15:07, Ady wrote: > >> Is there something I can test or help to diagnose? > > > > What about 6.03-pre18 (or newer)? > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ > > 6.03-pre18 is still slow: > > > 16:06:07.494125 IP dell.phahn.dev.49232 > xen12.phahn.dev.57501: UDP, length 4 > >

Hello Ady, On 23.07.2014 16:21, Ady wrote: > FWIW, you have not mentioned specifically updating to BIOS version > A11 before trying A15. I started with A05, updated to A10, then A11 and now A15. >

Hello, On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >> PS: <http://www.zytor.com/~genec/lpxelinux-6.03p18g3.tgz> did not work. > > As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC > address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from > here:

Hello, On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC >>> address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from >>> here:

Hello, I have a problem with our DELL E6510 notebooks (BIOS version A05): 1. After the update from syslinux-3.71 to 4.02 LOCALBOOT no longer works. I've read <http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility#LOCALBOOT_on_Dell_Latitude_E6400> and neither version works. The behavior differs between the laptop rebooting automatically and getting stuck. I checked all versions

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello, > > On 23.07.2014 22:46, Alexander Perlis wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Philipp Hahn wrote: >>> [...] >>> I tried lpxelinux.0, but it fails to resolve the gateway >>> address via ARP: >>> 17:25:51.399119 ARP, Request who-has 10.200.17.1 tell >>>

Hello, On 23.07.2014 15:07, Ady wrote: >> Is there something I can test or help to diagnose? > > What about 6.03-pre18 (or newer)? > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ 6.03-pre18 is still slow: > 16:06:07.494125 IP dell.phahn.dev.49232 > xen12.phahn.dev.57501: UDP, length 4 > 16:06:07.494250 IP xen12.phahn.dev.57501 >

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello, > > On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: >>> PS: <http://www.zytor.com/~genec/lpxelinux-6.03p18g3.tgz> did not work. >> >> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58378 --- Comment #34 from Andreas Loew <awl1 at gmx.net> --- Bad news once again... I applied the following single-line patch to a stock 3.12.4 kernel in order to switch to the NV50 fence: diff -Nrpu linux-3.12.4.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c linux-3.12.4/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c ---

Just a minor point in the suggested solution: df$LAP <- with(df, ifelse(G=='male', (WC-65)*TG, (WC-58)*TG)) since WC and TG are not conditional, would this be a slight improvement? df$LAP <- with(df, TG*(WC - ifelse(G=='male', 65, 58))) -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Jorgen Harmse via R-help Sent: Friday,

Well, something like: LAP <- ifelse(gender =='male', (WC-65)*TG, (WC-58)*TG) The exact code depends on whether your variables are in a data frame or list or whatever, which you failed to specify. If so, ?with may be useful. Cheers, Bert On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:43?AM Md. Kamruzzaman <mkzaman.m at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I have three variables: Waist

df$LAP <- with(df, ifelse(G=='male', (WC-65)*TG, (WC-58)*TG)) That will do both calculations and merge the two vectors appropriately. It will use extra memory, but it should be much faster than a 'for' loop. Regards, Jorgen Harmse. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 11:10:49 +1030 From: "Md. Kamruzzaman" <mkzaman.m at gmail.com>

Hello Everyone, I have three variables: Waist circumference (WC), serum triglyceride (TG) level and gender. Waist circumference and serum triglyceride is numeric and gender (male and female) is categorical. From these three variables, I want to calculate the "Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) Index". The equation to calculate LAP is different for male and females. I am giving both