similar to: guest permission bug?

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hi folks, I'm running CentOS 6.5 on our storage nodes, with Samba 4.1.11 RPMs from Sernet. We're having a strange issue with MacOSX clients (testing on 10.9.4) when writing directories. Relevant smb.conf share portions: create mask = 0660 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 nt acl support = no With these in

This patch allows one to repeat the '-x' option a third time to stop rsync from traversing potentially cyclic bind mounts that are on the same filesystem. For example, the following scenario would cyclically traverse the bind mounts until the OS (Linux in this case) hits a maximum traversal count, thank goodness. Other OSes may traverse the bind mount indefinitely... su cd mkdir

Hi, I am some difficulty in traversing and quering about selectionDAG. One great way of doing it is through Dot as described in the docs. However, in my case the llvm source code is installed on a remote linux machine and I am accessing it through a Windows PC. So the "popping out" of graphs is not possible. Is there a way that I can dump the output of viewGraph() in a file and run dot

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:55:41 +0200 Jonathan Szalavecz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I thought with the ACL it would be easier but it is the same > nightmare :-( > > > john_johnk at raspberrypi:~ $ getfacl /mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > # file: mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers > #

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7321 Summary: Extend "p" filter modifier to make source dirs prunable Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello all, I do not read C very well (especially kernel C). Though I have tried to muddle my way through an understanding of what''s going on in fib_hash.c, fib_rules.c, and route.c, I have not succeeded to my satisfaction, hence my post. I''m trying to document the general process of route selection, and have come up with the following overview. Could somebody point out any

>>>> Hello Thomas >>>> >>>> Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: >>>>> For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a >>>>> problem with group write permission not being honored. >>>>> >>>>> This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have

Hi! Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a performance problem with gencache. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations > joined. > > Sometimes I find server CPU throttling at 100%. In order to let it drop Can you find out

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von:schulz at adi.com <schulz at adi.com> > Gesendet: Mon 6 April 2015 19:17 > An: mmuehlfeld at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.2.0: Group write permission not honored > > > Hello Thomas > > > > Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: > > > For anyone considering using

Hi Matt, All, Thanks for looking into this and your suggestions. I compiled the program with -O3 optimization level (clang -O3) on X86_64 target. After your suggestion, i ran the program with iteration of 10000 runs and found that average runtimes are (attaching data collected as well) Forward loop traverse : 2.006 milli seconds Reverse loop traverse : 1.531 milli seconds Yes, i agree that

Hi Rowland, Thanks to your guidance, I?ve set up permissions for all directories and files under |/mnt/shared| as follows: * *Directories* have ```|drwxr-xr-x| permissions and are owned by |root:root|.``` * *Files* are set to ```|rw-------|, also with |root:root```| ownership, except for executables, which have the necessary |rwx| permissions. I?d like to ensure

Hi - since Rgraphviz was officially moved over to Bioconductor, this might be a misguided post, but it's worth a shot: I'm plotting a graph using Rgraphviz and in an attempt to force the edges to be behind the nodes (on a fairly complex graph), I set the "outputorder" graph attribute to "edgesfirst" (as is described in the graphviz docs here ->

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:54:39PM +0100, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > > spite of the fact that the parent dir has full permissions for > > > "Domain Users" (on the Windows side). > > > > Ok - I might have at least a partial answer. Somehow the default mask in > > Samba still seems to be obeyed - even in AD mode. It seems to lack by > >

I am finding some weird behavior in the CallGraph, and am not sure what am I doing wrong. When trying to traverse nodes in the CallGraph I get stuck in nodes representing external functions. Take the following code: ----- #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf( "Hello World!\n" ); } ----- If I try to traverse the CallGraph using the following code: ----- CallGraph CG

Rowland, I realized I forgot to mention a few details about specific folders with unique permissions in /mnt/shared that I need to preserve in /mnt/shared/nas: 1. /mnt/shared/video_surveillance: Originally, this folder had drwxrwx--- permissions, with reolink as the owner and surveillance as the group. However, since the surveillance group has been removed, only john_johnk and reolink need

On Mon, 1 May 2017 22:18:14 -0400 Matt Savin <matt at tegers.com> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > > Did you uncheck "Register this connection's addresses in DNS" check box in > TCP/IP DNS Properties of your XP VM's network interface? > https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_tcpip_pro_usednsconfig.mspx?mfr=true > Did

I have been running Samba 4 as an AD/DC for a couple of years now with few problems. I provisioned the domain using --dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE and the /etc/named.conf includes the samba-tool provision created file /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf, with zone files in /var/lib/samba/private/dns. All that has been working just fine for for 2 or 3 years. Lately, I added a VirtualBox XP guest

This is a new one to me... Drivers install fine, but on some of the printers I get the "test page failed to print" message. I'm getting nothing in the samba logs from the workstation, smbd, nor from the cups logs. I've googled myself silly, but can only find other people asking the same or similar question. Some of them have found permissions to be the problem, but in