similar to: map two names into one

Thank You.. I used following command to generate .bc or .ll /Documents/clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04/bin/clang -O0 -emit-llvm -S -o vec4.ll vecsum.c /Documents/clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04/bin/clang -O0 -emit-llvm -S -o vec7.ll vecsum.c On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:49 AM Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > It is hard to tell

Hello, I am trying to use scalar evolution pass using following command; opt -analyze -mem2reg -indvars -loop-simplify -scalar-evolution < vec.bc when vec.bc is generated using newer version of LLVM i.e LLVM 6 and 7 i get following message in the end; Determining loop execution counts for: @main Loop %8: Unpredictable backedge-taken count. Loop %8: Unpredictable max backedge-taken count. Loop

Hi, I have encountered problem running virsh as non-root user. I am using eucalyptus software on top of KVM, eucalyptus requires to run virsh as non-root user. I've found that people had similiar issue posted in the list, but I didn't find the solution. I've tried few things. 1) put user eucalyptus in the libvirt group. 2) even changed owner /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock to

HI, You can do this: dat1<- read.csv("dat7.csv",header=TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE,sep="\t") dat.bru<- dat1[!is.na(dat1$evnmt_brutal),] fun2<- function(dat){? ????? lst1<- split(dat,dat$patient_id) ??? lst2<- lapply(lst1,function(x) x[cumsum(x$evnmt_brutal==0)>0,]) ??? lst3<- lapply(lst2,function(x) x[!(all(x$evnmt_brutal==1)|all(x$evnmt_brutal==0)),])

Dear R user: I have got the following problem: I have imported two data sets into R: one set includes price information, another one includes volume information. but I noticed the wrong data order problem in the product name, for instance, in one data set, "GALAXY ACE S 5830" in another one, it is "S 5830 GALAXY ACE" both represent same product. how do i map two name

input: > values [1] 0.854400 1.648465 1.829830 1.874704 7.670915 7.673585 7.722619 > thresholds [1] 1 3 5 7 9 expected output: [1] 1 4 4 4 7 That is, need a vector of indexes of the maximum value below the threshold. e.g. First element is "1", because value[1] is the largest below threshold "1". Second element is "4", because value[4] is the

Hi Guys, I have a taget instruction which take a vec4 and returns a vec4.( say instruction “vec4:$dst mod( vec4:$src)" ) And I want to use it to match i an ir instruction/intrinsic function( say " float:$dst llvm.irmod( vec4:$src)" which takes a vec4, output a float. I think the procedure is: when I see the intrinsic llvm.irmod, I need to call "extractlt(

Hi all, I’m not sure if this is the right list, so apologies if not. Doing some profiling I noticed some of my hand-tuned matrix multiply code with NEON intrinsics was much slower through a C++ template wrapper vs calling the intrinsics function directly. It turned out clang/LLVM was unable to eliminate a temporary even though the case seemed quite straightforward. Unfortunately any loads

I'm trying to debug a problem with our custom backend with using a tiered register allocation setup. Just a little background. My target uses vec4 32bit registers and I want to have three levels of registers setup. Each vec4 register can have two sub-regs of size vec2 32bit, and each sub-reg, has its own two sub-regs of 32bit each. So it looks like this, xyzw -> {xy, zw} -> {x, y, z,

Hello, My input language has support for 3 and 4 element vectors but my target only has support for the latter. The language defines vec3 with the same storage space as vec4 so from a backend perspective they are both the same. I'd really like if I could have LLVM treat vec3 as vec4 but I haven't found out how. Currently the target has emulated support for vec3 through LLVM. Loads are

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > 2005/7/23, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: >> What does a 'read only' register mean? Is it a constant (e.g. returns >> 1.0)? Otherwise, how can it be a useful value? > > Yes, it's a constant register. > > Because the instruction cannot contain an immediate value, a constant > value may be stored in

2005/7/23, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > What does a 'read only' register mean? Is it a constant (e.g. returns > 1.0)? Otherwise, how can it be a useful value? Yes, it's a constant register. Because the instruction cannot contain an immediate value, a constant value may be stored in a constant register, and it's defined _before_ the program starts by

Hi Dan, Thanks for your comments. I've responded inline below. On 26-Jun-08, at 6:49 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Jun 26, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Stefanus Du Toit wrote: >> >> === >> 1. Shufflevector only accepts vectors of the same type >> >> I would propose to change the syntax from: >> >>> <result> = shufflevector <n x <ty>>

James, Thanks for your response. I'm working in LLVM 2.7 (I know, it's old) and the default behavior is already promote. This means that for example a call to DAGTypeLegalizer::getTypeAction(v3i32) in my case and I presume in ARM NEON returns TypeWidenVector. From here legalization calls WidenVectorOperand() to process the STORE node and follows the call chain I have on my original email

On Jul 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I'm trying to debug a problem with our custom backend with using a tiered register allocation setup. > > Just a little background. My target uses vec4 32bit registers and I want to have three levels of registers setup. > Each vec4 register can have two sub-regs of size vec2 32bit, and each sub-reg, has its own two sub-regs of

Thanks, I think it can solve my problem. But please allow me to explain the hardware in detail. Hope there is more elegant way to solve it. The hardware is a "stream processor". That is, It processes samples one by one. Each sample is associated with several 128-bit four-element vector registers, namely: * input registers - the attributes of the sample, the values of the registers

Hey, as some of you may know we're in process of experimenting with LLVM in Gallium3D (Mesa's new driver model), where LLVM would be used both in the software only (by just JIT executing shaders) and hardware (drivers will implement LLVM code-generators) cases. While the software only case is pretty straight forward I just realized I missed something in my initial evaluation. That

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:22 PM Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > > We're in-progress designing a RISC-V extension (http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2019-January/000433.html) that would have variable-length vectors of short vectors (1 to 4): > <VL x <4 x

From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen [mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:56 PM To: Villmow, Micah Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] (no subject) On Jul 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: I'm trying to debug a problem with our custom backend with using a tiered register allocation setup. Just a little background. My target uses vec4 32bit registers and

On 11.01.2015 06:05, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Can you elaborate a bit as to why that's the right thing to do? > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Tobias Klausmann > <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >> If we capture transform feedback from n stream in (n-1) buffers we face a >> NULL buffer, use the buffer (n-1) to capture the output of stream n.