similar to: A warning message in glht

Hello everybody, problem solved, there was a typo. I wrote Type instead of Material Best ----Messaggio originale---- Da: angelo.arcadi@virgilio.it Data: 22-giu-2012 11.05 A: <r-help@r-project.org> Ogg: Error with glht function: Error in mcp2matrix(model, linfct = linfct) : Variable(s) 'Type' have been specified in 'linfct' but cannot be found in 'model'!

Dear list members, I get the following error when using the glht function to perform a post hoc analysis for an ANOVA with repeated measures: require(nlme) lme_H2H_musicians = lme(H2H ~ Emotion*Material, data=musicians, random = ~1|Subject) require(multcomp) summary(glht(lme_H2H_musicians, linfct=mcp(Type = "Tukey")), test = adjusted(type = "bonferroni")) Error in

Hi, I have a fairly simple repeated measures-type data set I've been attempting to analyze using the lme function in the nlme package. Repeated searches here and other places lead me to believe I have specified my model correctly. However, I am having trouble with post-hoc tests. From what I gather, other people are successfully using the glht function from the multcomp package to

Dear R members, I tried to fit an lme model and to use the glht function of multcomp. However, the glht function gives me some errors when using weights=varPower(). The glht error makes sense as glht needs factor levels and the model works fine without weights=. Does anyone know a solution so I do not have to change the lme model? Thanks Sibylle --> works fine

Dear R-user I used lme to fit a linear mixed model inlcuding weights=varPower(). Additionally I wanted to use glht to calculate Tukey-Kramer multiple comparision. error: > glht(modelF, linfct=mcp(Species="Tukey")) Error in glht.matrix(model = list(modelStruct = list(reStruct = list(SubPlot = -0.305856275920955, : ?ncol(linfct)? is not equal to ?length(coef(model))? >

Hi everyone, I am new to R and have a question that relates to unplanned post-hoc comparisons using the multcomp package after a mixed effects model. I couldn't find the answer to it in the archive or in any manual. I have a dataset in which several plants have been treated in a particular way and a continuous response variable has been measured depending on several leaves per plant. I am

I've run an ancova, edadysexo is a factor with 3 levels,and log(lcc) is the covariate (continous variable) I get this results > ancova<-aov(log(peso)~edadysexo*log(lcc)) > summary(ancova) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) edadysexo 2 31.859 15.9294 803.9843 <2e-16 *** log(lcc) 1 11.389 11.3887 574.8081 <2e-16 ***

Hi, I want to export the result of glht in R into a LaTeX table, such as that result: Linear Hypotheses: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) Group1 - Group2 == 0 -0.14007 0.01589 -8.813 <0.001 "***" Group1 - Group3 == 0 -0.09396 0.01575 -5.965 <0.001 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05

Hi, I am trying to test some contrasts, using glht() in multcomp package on fixed effects in a linear mixed model fitted with lme() in nlme package. The command I used is: ## a simple randomized block design, ## type is fixed effect ## batch is random effect ## model with interaction dat.lme<-lme(info.index~type, random=~1|batch/type, data=dat) glht(dat.lme, linfct = mcp(type

Hi, I am experimenting with using glht() from multcomp package together with coxph(), and glad to find that glht() can work on coph object, for example: > (fit<-coxph(Surv(stop, status>0)~treatment,bladder1)) coxph(formula = Surv(stop, status > 0) ~ treatment, data = bladder1) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p treatmentpyridoxine -0.063 0.939 0.161

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:

I have a question about TukeyHSD and the glht function because I'm getting different answers when a covariate is included in model for ANCOVA.? I'm using the cabbages dataset in the 'MASS' package for repeatability.? If I include HeadWt as a covariate, then I get different answers when performing multiple comparisons using TukeyHSD and the glht function. The difference appears

Hi, I have been trying glht() from multcomp package and contrast() from contrast package to test a contrast that I am interested in. With the following simulated dataset (fixed effect "type" with 3 levels (b, m, t), and random effect "batch" of 4 levels, a randomized block design with interaction), sometimes both glht() and contrast() worked and gave nearly the same p values;

Hi all: There's a question about glht function. My data:data_ori,which inclue CD4, GROUP,time. f_GROUP<-factor(data_ori$GROUP) f_GROUP is a factor of 3 levels(0,1,2,3) result <- lme(sqrt(CD4) ~ f_GROUP*time ,random = ~time|ID,data=data_ori) glht(result, linfct = mcp(f_GROUP="Tukey") ) Error in `[.data.frame`(mf, nhypo[checknm]) : undefined columns selected I can't

Hi, i was working with this model > mq<-glm(rojos~edadysexo*zona*estacion,quasipoisson) and i get this minimal adequate model > anova(mq5,test="F") Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev F Pr(>F) NULL 518 64799 edadysexo 2 1556.5 516 63243 8.9434 0.0001524 *** zona 4

Hi, I use glht to make multcomp, using Tukey, from a glm model. It is possible to get a more simplified output of result? Somethink like ordering by letters. Thanks Ronaldo -- Human kind cannot bear very much reality. -- T. S. Eliot, "Four Quartets: Burnt Norton" -- > Prof. Ronaldo Reis J?nior | .''`. UNIMONTES/Depto. Biologia Geral/Lab. de Ecologia | : :' :

Hi R helpers! I have used a glht as a post-hoc test on an lmer with: -2 treatments (A & B) -1 categorical explanatory variable (song type) -1 response variable (latency to respond) I wanted to make comparisons between the categorical variables depending on treatment. At the moment the glht simply returns comparisons of each of the (3) categorical explanatory variables with each other

Using a factor with 'number' levels the straightforward symbolic formulation of a contrast in 'glht' of the 'multcomp' package fails. How can this problem be resolved without having to redefine the factor levels? Example: #A is a factor with 'number' levels #B similar factor with 'letter' levels dat<-data.frame(y=1:4,A=factor(c(1,1,2,2)),

Hi, I,ve a run a model like this mcrm<-glm(catroj~month,binomial) being catroj a binary response variable with two levels (infected and non infected) > anova(mcrm3,test="Chisq") Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev P(>|Chi|) NULL 520 149.81 mes 3 16.86 517 132.94 0.0007551 *** When I?m trying to do a post

I am not sure whether there is a bug. When I tested the example given for "glht" in the help, I entered the following error: Running commands: amod <- aov(minutes ~ blanket, data = recovery) rht <- glht(amod, linfct = mcp(blanket = "Dunnett"), alternative = "less") Errors are: Error in try(coef.(model)) : could not find function