similar to: Commercial features in Dovecot future: Object storage, archive

Hello, I found a posting on the mailing list from 2008 "Adding new storage backend to Dovecot" while searching for POP3 and IMAP servers, that allow to use a NoSQL backend rather than a traditional file system. The problem with traditional filesystems is, that they are very limited. You cannot easily extend it, even with RAID 10 all messages may be lost due to a RAID controller

Hi, I installed dovecot 2.2.36-rc1 and enabled: mail_attachment_detection_options = add-flags-on-save but when messages are delivery via dovecot-lda into mailbox (Maildir) keywords are not added. Only when the messages is open keywords ($HasAttachment or $HasNoAttachment) are added. From the wiki "attachments are detected and marked during save", delivery via LDA is

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

We are pleased to release first release candidate for v2.3.14. We have done changes to packaging so please give us any feedback on how it works. https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.14.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.14.rc1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images are not available for this release candidate. Kind regards, Aki

We are pleased to release first release candidate for v2.3.14. We have done changes to packaging so please give us any feedback on how it works. https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.14.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/rc/dovecot-2.3.14.rc1.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Docker images are not available for this release candidate. Kind regards, Aki

Hi, during the weekend I upgrade my mail servers from dovecot 2.1.13 to dovecot 2.1.14 (and rebuild dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-0.3.3). After upgrade all works fine, but today the load avarage un MXs is doubled. Mailboxes are in Maildir/ on NFS and I'm using dovecot as LDA and dict quota only for quota usage. May be a problem with the new version? This is my configuration: $ ./configure

Ive been using qmail+vpopmail+courier-imap for many years but its time to retire that server so I thought this might be an opportunity to see how I could use Postfix and Dovecot to provide the same services. Im running Dovecot 2.1.9 and Postfix 2.9.4. I have spent a few days reading through some of the docs on the wiki (there's doesn't seem to be any large overview of Dovecot concepts or

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

Hi, I'm running 3 Dovecot director and 6 Dovecot backend on CentOS 6 and Dovecot 2.3.10, with Maildir shared on NFSv3 (on NetApp). Since CentOS 6 will be EOL on November I started to upgrade to CentOS 7 the first Dovecot backend. But after Director start to direct users on new CentOS 7 server some errors, for any users, come up, an example: Aug 21 14:56:41 Error: imap(alessio at

Hi! Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome. https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy

Is there a current best practice for a shared filesystem backend for mailboxes (in my case, all virtual accounts)?? NFS 3/4, GFS2, GlusterFS, other?? In the case of the latter ones, is the use of Director necessary?? Any specific anti-recommendations?? Also, if it matters, I *think* I want to use BackBlaze racks for storage.? Also, I've seen recommendations for the filesystem underneath like

Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm,

Hi, with the latest dovecot-ee version (dovecot-ee-2.2.26.1-10) if I run ?doveadm expunge -A mailbox Spam savedbefore 30d? dovecot an error: doveadm: Error: dict-client: Commit failed: Dict server timeout: No input for 1916.209 secs (1 commands pending, oldest sent 0.000 secs ago: C1) (reply took 0.000 secs) doveadm: Error: expire: Dictionary commit failed Probably also "doveadm quota

Dear all, I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in the way described

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

Il 18/07/19 21:42, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On 18 Jul 2019, at 11.44, Alessio Cecchi via dovecot > <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and >> director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) >> >> Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director

Hello, I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and this is the last question I need to address... I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no experience with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs old now), and never had a problem (knock on wood), but considering its current situation (little to no development support for reasons

Hi, I enabled mail_attachment_detection_options on dovecot 2.2.34, in 10-mail.conf I have: mail_attachment_detection_options = add-flags-on-save but when an email is delivered in mailbox (Maildir) via LMTP no flag (HasNoAttachment or HasAttachment) was added. In dovecot-keywords file I have: 0 $HasNoAttachment 1 NonJunk 2 $HasAttachment so I thinks that the feature was eanbled but is

Hi I have dovecot-2.2.36.4 (director) + 5 nodes dovecot (dovecot-2.2.36.4) What version of Solr do you recommend ? -- Maciej Mi?aszewski Starszy Administrator Systemowy IQ PL Sp. z o.o. Biuro Obs?ugi Klienta: e-mail: bok at iq.pl tel.: +48 58 326 09 90 - 94 fax: +48 58 326 09 99 Dzia? pomocy: https://www.iq.pl/pomoc Informacja dotycz?ca przetwarzania danych osobowych:

If I?m running only imap-login service in my dovecot imap proxy, do I need to configure userdb or only passdb?