similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 93, Issue 5

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1426 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1426.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: aa500979ef80025fcaab323bf0ae7bca9f266d8a72232c24fd1033f0d923d9b5 kernel-2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.i686.rpm

Hello, I am having trouble installing the server modules for lustre 2.1.4 and use mellanox''s OFED distribution so we may use infiniband. Would you folks look at my procedure and results below and let me know what you think? Thanks very much! The mellanox ofed installation builds and installs some kernel modules too, so I used this method to ensure OFED compiled against the correct

Hi, Disabled ipv6 (using sysctl, disabled ip6tables, no reboot, no proxy present) and still get the message as below. Centos 6.3 (i know its old) Kernel : 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 (I know its old) Standard /etc/yum.conf (no changes) Standard repos (centos base), enabled Cleaned cache: yum metadata (didn't work) Then: yum clean all (didn't work) Then yum makecache (didn't work)

Dear All, I'm a new user of Dovecot and I need support with the authentication process. I use Dovecot 2.0.9 and Postfix 2.6.6 on host x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) I need to select the validation method depending on the user. I have users that have to be authenticate with UNIX account, and I have others thats have to be authenticate with

Hello, We're having an issue with our distributed gluster filesystem: * gluster 3.3.1 servers and clients * distributed volume -- 69 bricks (4.6T each) split evenly across 3 nodes * xfs backend * nfs clients * nfs.enable-ino32: On * servers: CentOS 6.3, 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 * cleints: CentOS 5.7, 2.6.18-274.12.1.el5 We have a directory containing 3,343 subdirectories. On

Hello, I (now) own an Emerson Liebert GXT3 6000VA conected via USB. I've searched the web trying to configure nut (nut-2.6.5-1.el6.x86_64 epel rpm on CentOS 6.3) to monitor the UPS, but couldn't find a successful configuration. I'm running kernel 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64. The UPS is connected with an USB cable: Bus 004 Device 002: ID 10af:0008 Liebert Corp. PowerSure Interactive

Hi, from man yum.conf: ip_resolve Determines how yum resolves host names. `4' or `IPv4': resolve to IPv4 addresses only. `6' or `IPv6': resolve to IPv6 addresses only. On 25 December 2014 at 11:53, Mateusz Guz <Mateusz.Guz at itworks.pl> wrote: > Hi, > > Disabled ipv6 (using sysctl, disabled ip6tables, no reboot, no

Tried that :D yum is still trying to connect via ipv6 (ip_resolve=4 in config file) -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Alikhan Damirov Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 11:59 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] (py)curl error 7 Hi, from man yum.conf: ip_resolve Determines how yum resolves

Hi, we have a problem with our director proxy configuration. When we run on proxy server the doveadm command with -A switch, fails with the error: # doveadm -D quota get -A doveadm(user1): Debug: auth input: user=user1 proxy starttls=any-cert doveadm(user1): Error: Proxy is missing destination host doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users If we execute the command with a single

hi all, I have a problem with my CentOS 6.3 distribution only when I restart or turn off the machine it does not restart properly. remains in both cases black screen and then I do not understand exactly what he's doing. grub after I hit send and then darkness. only after that forcement for a further time the power cycle then it works. the kernel version is 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.i686 where is

Sendmail 8.14.4 dovecot 2.0.9 I have sendmail working and it is sending mail to /var/mail/%u. I have dovecot working in that I can move emails into IMAP folders and I can send email through IMAP. I have set up dovecot to use mdbox based on the following: mail_location = mdbox:~/mail However, I seem to be lacking a key piece of information. Sendmail is sending the mail to /var/mail/%u as a

Hi, I am not sure if this is the right eMail-list to ask questions. I have the problem that with a second connect to a samba share the user is authenticated as guest. The first authentication was right done on my own user account. What i am doing wrong ? Thansk Michael [2013/01/02 11:06:34.964955,? 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) ? pc-etw-051 (::ffff:172.28.96.114) connect to

After successfully updating three CentOS 6.3 VM guests to 6.4 I decided to update the host as well. And it failed to boot. Kernel panic - Not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Pid: 1, comm: init not tainted: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Plus a call trace I couldn't see Luckily I was able to boot from the previous kernel and get my system back up. After booting to the previous kernel I

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I will be out of the office from Wednesday 8/31 and will be back in the office on 9/7.

I will be on class from Sep 26-Sep 30, 2011. I will be able to check and respond to the emails and issues with little delay. If any urgent issues, please get in touch with my manager or se_exadata_ww at oracle.com for other exadata related issues. Exadata related bugs: se_exadata_ww at oracle.com or Samuel.Vedanayagam at oracle.com (for any urgent escalations) Thanks Ravi

H_u*g_e N e*w.s To Im,pact C+Y T+V C+hina You+TV C-o.r'p_. Symbol-: C'Y.T*V We h,a+v-e al'ready s'e.e n CYTV''s mar+ket imp,act befor-e cl*imbin.g to o v.e.r $2.0'0 w*i't-h n e'w+s+. Pr,ess Releas_e: Chin*a YouTV'.s CnBo-o W+e,b S.i.t e Ra,nks N+o'.'1 on Mi'croso_ft L i'v+e S+earch En+gine C nBoo Traff_ic Inc rea*ses 4*9-%

This is slightly off-topic for the Syslinux mailing list, but I think it is still pertinent and it might be helpful anyway. I am confused about some conflicting information regarding DHCP option 93, Architecture Type. The UEFI specification v.2.4 Errata B, Table 179, "PXE Tag Definitions for EFI", makes reference to a table in:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93 Summary: iptables -L format bug Product: iptables userspace Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

> > > -----Original Message----- > ... > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:16:46PM +0000, Demikhovsky, Elena wrote: > > vmovaps should not access stack if it is not aligned to 32 > > I'm not completely sure I understand your problem. Are you saying that > the generated code assumes 256bit