similar to: help with shadow copy implementation

Hello, Thank you everyone in advance for your time and support? I am the Administrator of a small network, with about 60 desktops (mostly windows 10) that connect to a Linux VM running samba for file sharing).? In the last few months I completed the transition from the Samba server running as a vm on an OpenVZ machine.? It was running Centos 6, with an older version of samba.? Now the server has

I have "/home" as a logical volume. I have snapshots: LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert 2010.02.05-01.26.19 Home swi-ao 10.00G lvol0 39.81 2010.02.06-02.37.52 Home swi-ao 5.00G lvol0 0.25 lvol0 Home owi-ao 1.00T and they are mounted:

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 12.1 system with Samba 4.11.8 using ZFS and I want to get shadow copies working, however the clients (Windows 10) don't show anything in the 'previous versions' tab. I think it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0),

We have: vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl (Actually, vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl fruit streams_xattr, but I wanted to point out the order of shadow_copy2 and zfsacl). To rule out shadow:format problems, I would create just one snapshot with a simple name and configure shadow:format accordingly. Also, is /public the mountpoint of the ZFS dataset? If not, then you might need

Hi, i tried to running Samba 3.0.9 with MSDFS under Linux 2.6.9. The normal sharing of Directories to the Target-Server (also Samba with same version and Linux) run's without problems. Only the dfs-share to the same Samba-Server is not usable. The Share-Name self is visible but without cointain. I have compiled the new source with the "--with-msdfs" switch and have also check the

Release Announcements --------------------- Samba 4.1.17, 4.0.25 and 3.6.25 have been issued as security releases in order to address CVE-2015-0240 (Unexpected code execution in smbd.). For the sake of completeness, Samba 4.2.0rc5 including a fix for this defect will follow soon, but it won't be a dedicated security release and will therefore address other bug fixes also. o CVE-2015-0240:

Release Announcements --------------------- Samba 4.1.17, 4.0.25 and 3.6.25 have been issued as security releases in order to address CVE-2015-0240 (Unexpected code execution in smbd.). For the sake of completeness, Samba 4.2.0rc5 including a fix for this defect will follow soon, but it won't be a dedicated security release and will therefore address other bug fixes also. o CVE-2015-0240:

Hello all, I already successfully configured shadow copy service without a delimiter and regex. But as soon as I try to get this to work with regex, nothing shows up on the win client. My config looks like this: [global] shadow: localtime = yes shadow: sort = desc shadow: format = _%FT%T shadow: delimiter = _ shadow: snapprefix = ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Hello. I am trying to get the windows "previous versions" / shadow copies to work with our setup (samba+winbind over objectivefs). I have setup a test where I manually mounted two objectivefs snapshots in the /snapshots/ directory. Objectivefs filesystem is mounted on /ofs. When I try and look at the "previous version" in windows I get the error "there are no previous

Hi folks, I've been trying to get shadow copy / previous versions working under sernet-samba-ad-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64. I cannot see where I am going wrong. I have: [global] workgroup = COMPANY realm = COMPANY.LOCAL netbios name = DC server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind,

Louis, could you take a look on my case again? I am not sure that the problem is in incorrect groups. Only trusted credentials don't work. Have you any idea what the reason is? On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:50, Yakov Revyakin <yrevyakin at gmail.com> wrote: > Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu > 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is

Dear Help, We are in the process of setting up a new domain using Active Directory on Windows Server 2003R2. One of our goals was to use Active Directory for authentication on our AIX box (running version 6.1). I was able to successfully set up Kerberos, and the LDAP client to connect to our AD server so that you can now log in to the AIX box with users found in Active Directory. However, no

On 19:47:03 wrote Rowland penny: > > I have just started an old vm with samba 3.6.6 as pdc and openlap > > as backend. smbpasswd -a someuser does not work, if someuser does > > not exist. > > Are you using smbldap-tools or ldapsam:editposix ? In this vm ldapsam:editposix. OK. I have just created a posix-only user in openldap. And then tried smbpasswd -a test01.

Hai, I dont use trusts myself, this is what i see. Lets take small steps here. First of all, why does the DOMAIN contains/shows a dot in it. ( i think its a wrong setting in sssd, but i dont know sssd ) I know this is one of your REALMs and not the domain. I refer to : https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/909264/naming-conventions-in-active-directory-for-computers-domains-sites-and

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u5 Severity: important Tags: patch security -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),

Hi, Is it possible to have a static user database along with an LDAP password database and *not* be forced to set "allow_all_users=yes" for the userdb? The wiki page on static user database says "Normally static userdb handles this by doing a passdb lookup instead." How should the passdb behave in order for this to work? In my tests (on a test server) I am using

Hi, I want to use Xen on a current Testing using the amd64 architecture. I want to use the i386 architecture for the laster Xen guests. The hardware is a Intel Xeon 5130 (Woodcrest) with the Vanderpool support. Two harddisk are used as a Linux software raid 1. Installing the hypervisor and rebooting worked like a charm since the bootmenu of grub has also been updates:) The hypervisor is

Hi All, when i did testing with group mapping, i mapped a Unix Group(domadm) with Windows Domain Group(domain users). then i access a samba share from Windows Domain User(administrator), and create a file. but the file's group is still Windows Domain Group(domain user), not Unix Group(domadm). is it right? if it is, how should i check if my group mapping is working well? thanks a lot in

hi, i would like to allow access to specific samba shares, where the windows domain user is NOT authenticated against the share with it's username, but with a membership of a given windows-group. example: windows-domain user "test01" --> which is a member of windows domain group "smb_test01" --> which gets mapped to the unix-group "smb01" --> which is