similar to: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PATCHv2 net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically"

2012 Oct 29
9
[PATCH net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically
tun supports zero copy transmit since 0690899b4d4501b3505be069b9a687e68ccbe15b, however you can only enable this mode if you know your workload does not trigger heavy guest to host/host to guest traffic - otherwise you get a (minor) performance regression. This patchset addresses this problem by notifying the owner device when callback is invoked because of a data copy. This makes it possible to
2012 Oct 29
9
[PATCH net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically
tun supports zero copy transmit since 0690899b4d4501b3505be069b9a687e68ccbe15b, however you can only enable this mode if you know your workload does not trigger heavy guest to host/host to guest traffic - otherwise you get a (minor) performance regression. This patchset addresses this problem by notifying the owner device when callback is invoked because of a data copy. This makes it possible to
2012 Nov 01
9
[PATCHv3 net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically
tun supports zero copy transmit since 0690899b4d4501b3505be069b9a687e68ccbe15b, however you can only enable this mode if you know your workload does not trigger heavy guest to host/host to guest traffic - otherwise you get a (minor) performance regression. This patchset addresses this problem by notifying the owner device when callback is invoked because of a data copy. This makes it possible to
2012 Nov 01
9
[PATCHv3 net-next 0/8] enable/disable zero copy tx dynamically
tun supports zero copy transmit since 0690899b4d4501b3505be069b9a687e68ccbe15b, however you can only enable this mode if you know your workload does not trigger heavy guest to host/host to guest traffic - otherwise you get a (minor) performance regression. This patchset addresses this problem by notifying the owner device when callback is invoked because of a data copy. This makes it possible to
2011 Jul 17
3
[PATCHv9] vhost: experimental tx zero-copy support
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle at us.ibm.com> This adds experimental zero copy support in vhost-net, disabled by default. To enable, set the zerocopytx module option to 1. This patch maintains the outstanding userspace buffers in the sequence it is delivered to vhost. The outstanding userspace buffers will be marked as done once the lower device buffers DMA has finished. This is monitored
2011 Jul 17
3
[PATCHv9] vhost: experimental tx zero-copy support
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle at us.ibm.com> This adds experimental zero copy support in vhost-net, disabled by default. To enable, set the zerocopytx module option to 1. This patch maintains the outstanding userspace buffers in the sequence it is delivered to vhost. The outstanding userspace buffers will be marked as done once the lower device buffers DMA has finished. This is monitored
2013 Aug 30
12
[PATCH V2 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. With this series, 5% - 10% improvement for per cpu throughput were seen during netperf guest sending test. Plase review. Changes from V1: - Fix the zerocopy enabling check by changing the check of upend_idx != done_idx to (upend_idx + 1) % UIO_MAXIOV == done_idx. - Switch to use put_user() in
2013 Aug 30
12
[PATCH V2 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. With this series, 5% - 10% improvement for per cpu throughput were seen during netperf guest sending test. Plase review. Changes from V1: - Fix the zerocopy enabling check by changing the check of upend_idx != done_idx to (upend_idx + 1) % UIO_MAXIOV == done_idx. - Switch to use put_user() in
2013 Sep 02
8
[PATCH V3 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. With this series, 5% - 10% improvement for per cpu throughput were seen during netperf guest sending test. Plase review. Changes from V2: - Typo fixes and code style fix - Add performance gain in the commit log of patch 2/6 - Retest the update the result in patch 6/6 Changes from V1: - Fix the zerocopy enabling check
2013 Sep 02
8
[PATCH V3 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. With this series, 5% - 10% improvement for per cpu throughput were seen during netperf guest sending test. Plase review. Changes from V2: - Typo fixes and code style fix - Add performance gain in the commit log of patch 2/6 - Retest the update the result in patch 6/6 Changes from V1: - Fix the zerocopy enabling check
2013 Aug 16
10
[PATCH 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. Plase review. Thanks Jason Wang (6): vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time vhost_net: poll vhost
2013 Aug 16
10
[PATCH 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement
Hi all: This series tries to unify and simplify vhost codes especially for zerocopy. Plase review. Thanks Jason Wang (6): vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time vhost_net: poll vhost
2013 Aug 16
1
[PATCH 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to poll vhost queue before making DMA is done, this is racy if vhost > thread were waked up before marking DMA is done which can result the signal to > be missed. Fix this by always poll the vhost thread before DMA is done. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Indeed, but
2013 Aug 16
1
[PATCH 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to poll vhost queue before making DMA is done, this is racy if vhost > thread were waked up before marking DMA is done which can result the signal to > be missed. Fix this by always poll the vhost thread before DMA is done. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Indeed, but
2013 May 06
13
[PATCH v2 00/11] vhost cleanups
MST, This is on top of [PATCH 0/2] vhost-net fix ubuf. Asias He (11): vhost: Remove vhost_enable_zcopy in vhost.h vhost: Move VHOST_NET_FEATURES to net.c vhost: Make vhost a separate module vhost: Remove comments for hdr in vhost.h vhost: Simplify dev->vqs[i] access vhost-net: Cleanup vhost_ubuf and vhost_zcopy vhost-scsi: Remove unnecessary forward struct vhost_scsi declaration
2013 May 06
13
[PATCH v2 00/11] vhost cleanups
MST, This is on top of [PATCH 0/2] vhost-net fix ubuf. Asias He (11): vhost: Remove vhost_enable_zcopy in vhost.h vhost: Move VHOST_NET_FEATURES to net.c vhost: Make vhost a separate module vhost: Remove comments for hdr in vhost.h vhost: Simplify dev->vqs[i] access vhost-net: Cleanup vhost_ubuf and vhost_zcopy vhost-scsi: Remove unnecessary forward struct vhost_scsi declaration
2013 Sep 04
2
[PATCH V3 4/6] vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 04:40:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Currently, even if the packet length is smaller than VHOST_GOODCOPY_LEN, if > upend_idx != done_idx we still set zcopy_used to true and rollback this choice > later. This could be avoided by determining zerocopy once by checking all > conditions at one time before. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at
2013 Sep 04
2
[PATCH V3 4/6] vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 04:40:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Currently, even if the packet length is smaller than VHOST_GOODCOPY_LEN, if > upend_idx != done_idx we still set zcopy_used to true and rollback this choice > later. This could be avoided by determining zerocopy once by checking all > conditions at one time before. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at
2020 Jun 03
1
[PATCH RFC 08/13] vhost/net: convert to new API: heads->bufs
On 2020/6/2 ??9:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Convert vhost net to use the new format-agnostic API. > In particular, don't poke at vq internals such as the > heads array. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
2013 Aug 30
1
[PATCH V2 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:29 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to poll vhost queue before making DMA is done, this is racy if vhost > thread were waked up before marking DMA is done which can result the signal to > be missed. Fix this by always poll the vhost thread before DMA is done. Does this bug only exist in net-next or is it older? Should the fix go to net and stable branches?