similar to: dovecot-lda not correct folder

hi all, i'm moving from a maildrop+courier setup to lda(sieve)+dovecot setup. with maildrop i had a global filter for all the users, so i could filter and archive into the spam folder spam tagged emails for users without custom filters, including them if they exist: LOGNAME=tolower($LOGNAME) `test -e $LOGNAME` if ( $RETURNCODE != 0 ) { `maildirmake $LOGNAME` `maildirmake

Hi all, I created as little script to run wine and automatically log the output and some basic information to a file. It can be downloaded from here: http://www.mohag.net/wine_with_log How to use: 1. Download (or create) it somewhere and set it executable. wget http://www.mohag.net/wine_with_log chmod +x wine_with_log 2. Run application with wine_with_log rather than wine 3. Logs can be found

Hi all, I recently migrated my system (postfix/Dovecot)from mbox to Maildir. Almost everything is working (phone and thunderbird show all my mail and folders with mail) However I am stuck on my .procmailrc rules # cat /etc/procmailrc SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail SENDMAILFLAGS=-oi LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log ORGMAIL=${HOME}/Maildir/ DEFAULT=${ORGMAIL}

I noticed that my server has a lot ca. 1000x auth failure from different alocated in China / Romania and Netherlands per day since 3 days It looks to me like somebody was trying to get into server by guessing my password by brute force. what would be the best to stop this attack and how? the server running apache mysql and ftp PORT STATE SERVICE 21/tcp open ftp 80/tcp open http 443/tcp

Hi, I?ve posted this before but no one was able to help. I can?t figure out what they are trying to do, and if I should be concerned. I am running dovecot version 0.99.14 on Fedora Core 4. It appears that my dovecot server is under attack. This morning in my system e-mail I saw this: dovecot: Authentication Failures: rhost= : 23431 Time(s)

Hi there, I know this is the classic RTFM list question but... I've really tried hard on this and no result! This is what I'm receving from logcheck: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-= Apr 3 06:55:13 bsg sshd[32246]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=123.233.245.226 user=root Apr 3 06:55:19 bsg sshd[32248]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158 Summary: Setting the environment in authorized_keys does not work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

This issue has probably been brought up before, but I'll mention it anyway. I just downloaded and built openssh 3.9p1 on Solaris 8. In my environment, I have two root accounts. The normal one and an alternate one (rjohn - uid 0) with it's own home directory (/export/home/rjohn). After building and installing openssh, I was having trouble getting my RSA authentication to work. In

Please excuse the previous mail. My mailclient misbehaved. The below code to check for the environment variable NAME and for setting a default username of "" fails, because the else paths are only taken when there inside if condition is false anyways. The elses should not be there but instead each method should be used until a username is returned.

Hello, I'm having some problems getting LDA to work without userdb lookups and have a few related questions. This system has all users in MySQL, each user with unique UID/GID, no local users at all.? Installation is from apt-get. 1) If LDA is invoked without lookups, is it correct to assume that the "service auth" and "service auth-worker" can be completely removed

Hello List, I'm currently trying to compile VMKit for the L4 Operating System and the L4Re Runtime environment for my student project. While doing so I stumbled upon a bug in the implementation of lib/J3/Classpath/ClasspathVMSystemProperties.inc The current version first tries to get the username by checking the LOGNAME environment variable. If this is NULL it then checks tmp =

Presently, the Samba documentation says that the default NetBIOS username used by client-type applications is determined by the following (from smbclient(1)), If no username is supplied, it will default to an uppercase version of the environment variable USER or LOGNAME in that order. If no username is sup- plied and neither

Hi, News from the "AIX is different than the rest of the world" department... AIX has something similar to setluid() on SCO, just that it uses text strings (similar to setenv()) and calls it "usrinfo". I've appended the man page below. Under normal conditions, well-behaved applications use ttyname(), logname() and getuid() get the relevant informations, but today

We upgraded our Centos 4.3 box's samba from 3.0.10 to 3.0.22 using sernet.de rpms. Prior to upgrading, we had this box authenticating to AD just fine, but now it is broken. Here is part of my log file that might show what is going on. Jun 13 09:21:06 cent02 login(pam_unix)[2728]: check pass; user unknown Jun 13 09:21:06 cent02 login(pam_unix)[2728]: authentication failure; logname=LOGIN

>From my secure log: Sep 19 01:16:44 lin12 dovecot-auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): check pass; user unknown Sep 19 01:16:44 lin12 dovecot-auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser= rhost=::ffff:64.31.19.48 Sep 19 01:16:44 lin12 dovecot-auth: pam_succeed_if(dovecot:auth): error retrieving information about user aaron Sep 19 01:16:45 lin12

On Mon, Oct 08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > But out of interest, how are you creating this appliance? I thought > > > we'd ripped out support for old-style appliances from the rest of the > > > toolchain ... > > > > I use

So I'm confused as to why you're piping back from procmail to dovecot LDA, rather than having procmail be the final LDA. Why not use: :0 w * ^List-ID:.*jenkinsci-dev.googlegroups.com mailing-lists/jenkinsci-dev/ (The trailing slash tells procmail that jenkinssci-dev is a maildir, not an mbox) Also, procmail is way out of date, no longer maintained, and there are "semi" known

Add xfs_info to show the geometry of the xfs filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- Hi Rich, I got an odd error, can you help me with this error or give me a debug method? Thanks, Wanlong Gao daemon/Makefile.am | 1 + daemon/xfs.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml

Hi! I?m new to the list, and I?m not really having a ?problem?, but I?m seeing something in my log files that I wonder if I should be concerned. I?ve been using Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.14-8.fc4) on my Fedora Core 4 (kernel 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4) machine from quite some time. For the last few days, I?ve been seeing this in my daily ?Logwatch? e-mail: dovecot: Authentication Failures:

On 28/06/2023 17:52, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> I didn't try turning the last one off, but at least you are getting >> somewhere :-) > > With very little steps... ;-) > > >> When you say 'back to login screen', do you mean that you cannot just >> click the screen,