Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "does dovecot interpret any mail headers specially with maildir?"
2015 Jun 06
6
Dovecot mbox & other programs
Hello,
I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format (described
at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which
are stored on server (and used by dovecot).
What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that
I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header)
and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format.
And what is
2006 Aug 17
2
dovecot mbox to dovecot maildir migration
Hi,
I'm migrating accounts from one server with dovecot mbox and pam
nss-ldap authentication to a new server with dovecot maildir and mysql
auth (no posix accounts).
My problem is the pop3 uidl format on the two servers are different,
even though I'm using pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv in both configs,
I'm always re-downloading left messages on my test runs. Is there a
way I could
2013 Apr 16
1
Small documentation error?
Hello,
At http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox:
The UID for a new message is calculated from "last used UID" in
X-IMAP header + 1
Shouldn't it read "in X-UID header + 1" instead?
Axel
2008 May 08
5
MBOX to Maildir preserving the UIDL (outlook-tested, no redownloading)
TESTED AND RUNNING, MIGRATING from MBOX to MAILDIR, PRESERVE UID and OUTLOOK
sees the email as downloaded.
I hope this helps a lot of people out there.
Feel free to post this somewhere else too.
By: Horn Wijaya (hwijaya at nodens.biz) 8th May 2008
I have been searching for weeks for a foolproof method to migrate all my
users mbox to maildir/dovecot without having the pain of downloading
2005 Apr 08
2
1.0-test67
http://dovecot.org/test/
Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66
had and also some older problems reported in this list.
It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several
problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it
a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks
like it's stable..
BTW. mbox
2015 Sep 29
2
quota count
Hi
Dovecot: 2.2.19.rc2
OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
FS: XFS
Problem:
Dovecot it does not include line breaks in the letter. Bug or feautre?
Message size in fs: 1125 bytes
Message:
From cras at irccrew.org Tue Jul 23 19:39:23 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list dovecot); Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:39:23
+0300 (EEST)
Return-Path: <cras at irccrew.org>
Delivered-To: dovecot
2008 Aug 06
4
Experience moving mailboxes from Dovecot 0.99.14 to Dovecot 1.07 => Improvement possible
Hi,
This small mail to share my observation about a recent move of mailboxes
between two servers and ask about explanation and/or improvement about UIDL
in dovecot.
SV1 : Dovecot 0.99.14 / Red Hat Fedore Core 4
SV2 : Dovecot 1.07 / CentOS 5.2
Mailboxes in /var/spool/mail on the twoo servers.
Test will be done with outlook express with option "leave message on server"
checked.
Goal is
2005 Jul 18
1
UID errors?
Hi all,
Keep getting these messages:
Jul 18 09:48:47 orxon dovecot: POP3(d2525): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/d2525 (109 > 3)
Jul 18 09:48:47 orxon dovecot: POP3(d2525): X-IMAPbase uid-last unexpectedly points outside mbox file /var/mail/d2525
For a bunch of users.
Any ideas?
2004 May 25
1
0.99.10.5 release candidate
http://dovecot.org/rc/
Thought I'd still make one 0.99.10.x release now that mbox corruption
problems are (hopefully) fixed.
Please test, if no problems are found this will be the final 0.99.10.5.
Changes since .4:
+ MySQL authentication, patch by Matthew Reimer
- mbox: APPEND reversed given \Draft and \Deleted flags
- mbox: "LF not found" errors happened sometimes when
2005 Apr 21
1
1.0-stable update
Just a note, I backported some larger mbox changes from 1.0-test67.
Hopefully works, but if you're going to try it test it well first :)
Should fix some issues related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase header handling and
maybe some other mbox related problems as well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186
2005 Dec 01
1
mbox separators ignored
Using dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2
I grabbed a bunch of Mailman archive files from the Weather mailing list
here:
<http://www.buoy.com/pipermail/weather/>
I gunzipped the older ones, then concatenated them all in correct order to
create one big mbox file. I dropped it into my ~/mail folder and started my
IMAP client (Mulberry) and opened the new Weather folder. It shows one
gargantuan
2008 Jun 20
2
v1.1.rc13 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz.sig
There's always time for one more release candidate. :) I was planning on
releasing v1.1.0 a couple of minutes before summer solstice (23:59 UTC
according to Wikipedia). Maybe it'll bring luck to the release. :)
- mbox: Fixed a crash when adding a new X-IMAPbase:
2008 Jun 20
2
v1.1.rc13 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc13.tar.gz.sig
There's always time for one more release candidate. :) I was planning on
releasing v1.1.0 a couple of minutes before summer solstice (23:59 UTC
according to Wikipedia). Maybe it'll bring luck to the release. :)
- mbox: Fixed a crash when adding a new X-IMAPbase:
2003 Nov 04
1
current CVS seems to have index problems.
Hi Timo.
I've checked out the current CVS version and tested it.
There seems to be a problem when dovecot accesses mailboxes
for the first time:
I have a mailbox with 4 mails, and no special IMAP headers.
(no X-IMAPBase, X-UID etc.) and it's in mbox format.
I log in, SELECT the folder and do
FETCH 2 BODY[]
and receive only a snipplet of the mail from
somewhere in the middle of it.
2004 May 10
2
1.0-test7
http://dovecot.org/test/
Lots of bugfixes related to syncing. There's still some left.
Somewhat working mbox support:
- combined syncing/rewriting uses much less disk I/O than with older
mbox code
- expunges aren't working yet
- last-uid field in X-IMAPbase header isn't updated
- it's currently syncing the whole mbox constantly even if it hasn't
changed
- it
2011 Mar 04
1
Error: FETCH [1] for mailbox badbox UID 1 got too little data: 2 vs 4 (fwd)
Hi all,
Any thoughts about this error? Should I file a bug report somewhere?
Cheers, Chris.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can send myself a test message that causes Dovecot to crash when I open
> it in Alpine, with the following error:
>
> Jan 12 14:52:52 one-mail dovecot: imap(chris): Error: FETCH [1] for
> mailbox badbox UID 1 got too
2012 Oct 29
3
mbox vs. maildir storage block waste
Hi.
I recently mentioned in several posts, that I'd tended to use mbox
rather than maildir, because you don't loose so much space (due to
always allocating full blocks per maildir file and thus per mail).
I made some tests of my archive, which consists of some 3,4 million
mails at a total of 42GB). Most of these mails are probably normal
sized, but there are also some with bigger
2005 Nov 10
0
dovecot dead but subsys locked
I'm running dovecot 20051026 version on Redhat4. I tried to do a stress
test. However dovecot dies after I login a few hundred users. I have
some error messages in my mail log and am not sure if they are related
to the problem.
[root at lms2 imap1505]# service dovecot status
dovecot dead but subsys locked
Nov 10 12:58:52 lms2 dovecot: imap1514 [IMAP 7593]: mbox sync: UID
inserted in the
2006 Apr 10
0
Missing X-IMAPbase header causing mbox corruption
If the first message in an mbox is deleted by an external program, therefore
removing the X-IMAPbase header, an error such as the following occurs.
Apr 9 20:10:51 sm1 dovecot: imap(306812): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 460
(mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 ||
ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid)
This prevents the user from logging
2009 Aug 22
1
critical X-UID reordering problem after upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2
We upgraded our imap server hardware and went from dovecot 1.1.3 to 1.2.3
in the process and have been having a critical problem since. I believe
I've tracked it down to X-UID reordering that dovecot seemed to do to the
mbox format (I know, I know...) inboxes. The problem has manifest itself
in several ways with different mail clients but the general problem is
that the mail clients have