similar to: Samba4 upgrade compatability

I've been playing around with Samba4 as an AD for a domain. I like it a lot and it's been very stable for me. I've been using Samba 3.5 for a while with OpenLDAP and connecting win7 computers fine, sharing files fine and even sharing printers and printer drivers fine. I'd like to move to Samba4 as by backend LDAP and Authentication server and, like many, want to also keep

I have no idea why, occasionally one of my samba4 servers won't respond to my RSAT tools on windows 7. I check the server and when I do a ps -aux I see many lines just like the following: root 28073 0.0 0.0 2132 52 ? S 00:11 0:00 /bin/sleep 999999999 3000063 28176 0.0 0.4 87604 7144 ? S 00:22 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd --configfile

I joined a samba 3.5.10 server to a samba4 active directory domain. Windows clients can't browse the root of the servers shares (\\192.168.10.10 ) but they can access the shares if I manually mount them. The following command works on the server that samba 3.5 is running on. smbclient -U administrator -L 127.0.0.1 The following command gives a NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE on a client

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:30:20 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 08:12 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:07:48 +1300 > > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a lot of work to change the situation, even more so

Hi all, I am in the process of finding the best way to use Samba4 as an AD under FreeBSD and ZFS. The following is based on own research, google, mail archives, a bit of source code etc. So please correct me if I am wrong. 1. ZFS is using NFSv4 ACLs. 2. NFSv4 ACLs are modelled with NTFS (Windows) ACLs in mind. 3. Samba4 started with a new ntvfs file server but that was abandoned (or

We had used Samba 4 alpha 17 for a long time and want to update our server now to Samba 4.0.x. The old Samba versions was using NTVFS and Samba 4.0.x is now using S3FS by default. So, what is the best practice now? Should we stay on NTVFS or should we switch to S3FS? The global part of our smb.conf looks like this: --- [global] interfaces = eth0 netbios name = PDC

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100

On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > > >

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:07:48 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > It is a lot of work to change the situation, even more so without loss > of important tests.  A number of tests, particularly for spoolss but > also of the cifs proxy (which in turn tests kerberos delegation), use > the ntvfs file server. OK, but how can you be sure that something you are

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs later, right? So I have a couple of questions: - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs later, should I select ntvfs??? Best regards, Felix

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 07:50:23 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 11:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 > > Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > Am 02.12.2016 um 06:55 schrieb Scott

I have a functioning samba & ldap setup. I'm using smbldap-tools and I want to move to using Idmap as a backend. Currently Ldap looks like: dc=domain,dc=org +--ou=Computers,dc=domain,dc=org -- --uid=name$,ou=Computers,dc=domain,dc=org +--ou=Groups,dc=domain,dc=org -- --cn=group,ou=Groups,dc=domain,dc=org +--ou=Idmap,dc=domain,dc=org +--ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=org --

So, I have a Samba4 domain setup, which is working pretty well. Our windows 7 computers all have outlook connected to Exchange that is hosted elsewhere. This also works great. I keep getting in the samba log messages like: Kerberos: UNKNOWN -- username\@domain.com at SAMBA.DOMAIN: no such entry found in hdb so, basically, the username is the e-mail username, not the samba username, the

Hi, how can I what filer server is currently running in samba4, s3fs or ntvfs? My smb.conf looks like this: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, web dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, dnsserver Im asking as when looging

Hello! I've just built my first samba4 (4.0.5) on an OpenIndiana machine without any problems. But when it comes to the provision step the problems begin. Everything is fine, if I call samba-tool with the --use-ntvfs option. But I want to use samba4 with s3fs because of the support for newer SMB protocol versions. But when I call samba-tool without --use-ntvfs option I got the following:

is it possible and how difficult is it, to use LDAP for all the user accounts and groups and password management? would this be something you would want to do? or is it better to stick with samba's initila way of dealing with users? Caleb O'Connell caleb@lincoln.midcoast.com (207)882-7792

I've noticed that the samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset --use-s3fs command does not work on a ZFS filesystem on FreeBSD. It does work if sysvol is moved to a volume that is able to be mounted with the acls flag. I will reference a ticket I started with FreeNAS here: https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/4351 As of version 9.2.1.1 s3fs is now the default using the workaround known for FreeBSD.

I chose them both during the installation phase. How affected ... samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes --use-ntvfs 2016-03-26 15:18 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 26/03/16 13:06, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > >> Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> schrieb: >> >> Hmm, not what

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am 02.12.2016 um 06:55 schrieb Scott Mattan via samba: > > I am currently trying to get a Samba 4.5.1 environment set up for > > testing and I am unable to get samba to request a new password from > > a windows user. The error that I get, is in Japanese,