similar to: Creating a polygon from an unordered set of points

Hello, I have an unordered list with 1 or two sub-lists - I like to convert it to a drop down list using prototype/scriptaculous. Does anybody have an example or some code to share - I''m specifically interested in the event observers (clicks, mouseover and mouseout events). Thank you in advance for your input. _______________________________________________

I don't understand under what situation ordered factor rather than unordered factor should be used. Could somebody give me some examples? What are the implications of order vs. unordered factors? Could somebody recommend a textbook to me?

I have data that comes into R already ordered. When I use ggplot, it orders them which I don't want. How do I fix this without changing options("contrast")? The data I have is number of days: 30 29 ... 20 19 ... 10 9 ... 1 When I plot with ggplot, it orders them by the first number only. So 3 ends up coming before 29. -- View this message in context:

Hi I was wondering if anybody knows of an extension to the Autocompleter that would allow us to send a JSON object from the server rather than an unordered list? How hard would it be to implement something like that? Cheers, Tench --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

This does not produce the expected output, yet does work on the dingus [1]: * asdf * asdf >> require ''maruku'' => true >> doc = Maruku.new("* asdf\n * asdf\n") => md_el(:document,[ md_el(:ul,[md_el(:li_span,["asdf * asdf"],{:want_my_paragraph=>false},[])],{},[]) ],{},[]) >> doc.to_html => "<ul>\n<li>asdf *

> Hello > > I would like to know if there is a command in R software for an > unordered multinomial logistic regression with repeated measures using > GEE? > > Any help will be appreciated. > > Kind regards > > Naomi Richmond. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -------------- next part -------------- >From 523a12e4e7939d00e4c7e09a5de534bc2e5baa3a Mon Sep 17

Hi All, I noticed LLVM target independent side is converting an ordered less than "setolt" into unordered greater than "setuge" operation. There are no target hooks to control going from the ordered mode into unordered. I am trying to figure out the best way to support unordered operation on Hexagon. We don't have a single instruction to do unordered operation. So we

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <sundeepk at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I noticed LLVM target independent side is converting an ordered less than > "setolt" into unordered greater than "setuge" operation. There are no > target hooks to control going from the ordered mode into unordered. > > I am trying to figure out the best way to support

> The function ISD::getSetCCInverse() would probably be useful for you > here: you can use it to transform an unordered operation into an > ordered operation. Thanks for your reply Eli. I will check how to convert unordered operations back to ordered one. I have another related question - is it possible for frontend (clang) to generate unordered operation from the source code? -Sundeep

I found that there is no diff in code generator for Ordered / Unordered FP compare instructions. FUCOMISS, FUCOMISD are generated in the both cases. - Elena --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Demikhovsky, Elena < elena.demikhovsky at intel.com> wrote: > I found that there is no diff in code generator for Ordered / Unordered > FP compare instructions. > FUCOMISS, FUCOMISD are generated in the both cases. > > > Yes. That's how fcmp is defined in LangRef. -Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On 29 August 2013 06:31, Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com> wrote: > Should I open a ticket for this? I think he was saying this is intended behaviour. Isn't the difference between ucomiss and comiss just whether an exception is raised for NaN? If so, a compare that used that instruction would have to become more like an "invoke" with a landingpad for the

Hello, I was trying to use a queue in linear order and to provide the exact order of members to dial by adjusting the uniqueid value. Obviously it doesn't work and it seems an old problem: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 Realtime configuration can't identify "orders" in the list of results, so the members for the queue are returned in random order.

I am attempted to examine the temporal independence of my data set and think I need an unordered multinomial logistic regression (or logit model) with repeated measures to do so. The data in question is location of chickens. Chickens could be in any one of 5 locations when a snapshot sample was taken. The locations of chickens (bird) in 8 pens (pen) were scored twice a day (AMPM) for 20 days

I'm trying to change an unordered factor into an ordered factor: data96$RV961327 <- data96$V961327 data96$RV961327[data96$V961327 %in% levels(data96$V961327)[4]] <- NA data96$RV961327[data96$V961327 %in% levels(data96$V961327)[5]] <- NA data96$RV961327 <- factor(data96$RV961327) attributes(data96$RV961327) levels(data96$RV961327) data96$RV961327 data96$RRV961327 <-

Hi Everybody, I have a data set in which each observation has a pair of students, with each kid id'd by a 4 digit number: > head(PAIRS) student1 student2 2 2213 2200 4 2198 2195 5 2199 2191 6 2229 2221 7 2247 2249 8 2250 2263 There is no significance to student1 vs. student2: they are just a pair, and the "variable" names could

Should I open a ticket for this? - Elena From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 19:51 To: Demikhovsky, Elena Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Ordered / Unordered FP compare are not handled properly on X86 On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com<mailto:elena.demikhovsky at

On Jun 13, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > When trying to generate a VFCmp instruction when UnsafeFPMath is set > to true I get an assert “Unexpected CondCode” on my x86 system. This > also happens with UnsafeFPMath set to false and using an unordered > compare. Could someone look into this? Have you filed a bug? > > While I’m at it, is there

Hello, I am trying to interface in my teaching some elementary probability with Monte Carlo ideas. In sampling from a finite population, the number of distinct samples of size 'k' from a population of size 'n' , when individuals are selected with replacement and the selection order does not matter, is choose(n + k -1, k). Does anyone have a suggestion about how to simulate