similar to: Problem with sieve. dovecot 2.0.17

Hey, I am testing Glusterfs as a storage backend for dovecot as a LDA and imap server. I have seen similar lines in the logs to these: May 21 10:46:01 mailgw dovecot: imap(eliezer at ngtech.co.il): Warning: Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1400658105 vs 1400658361): /home/vmail/ngtech.co.il/eliezer/Maildir/.Mailing_lists.ceph_users/dovecot-uidlist May 21

Hey John, I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp. This is the reason I am asking. I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in terms of VPN Client and Server. At: http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx But yet to try it. Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not

Hey Gordon, I do not have any security issue in this network. I need to connect to a remote network on a secure network. The options are pptp or l2tp(no ipsec encryption) so I do want to use l2tp like in (lac\lns) and I am looking for a client for CentOS. Note that it works in ubuntu so it is possible to achieve the same with CentOS but I do not know what is behind the gui that initiates the

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote: > I am unsure I understand what you wrote. > "XFS will create multiple AG's across all of those > devices," > Are you comparing md linear/concat to md raid0? and that the upper level XFS > will run on top them? Yes to the first question, I'm not understanding the second

You could say the same thing about computers in general: I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of the market!. Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Stainburn Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017

On Tuesday 10 January 2017 08:53:17 John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/9/2017 7:11 PM, fred roller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Frank Cox<theatre at melvilletheatre.com> > > > > wrote: > >> That sounds like a weak signal from your wifi transmitter. > > > > Or signal interference. Where is the antennae located on the server? > > Ran

Hello, First let me apologize for posting about a GUI topic on here. There's a reason why I did that, and it's because the underlying concept of this is connected to Asterisk.Here's my situation: Twenty wifi clients connecting to our wireless router (Cisco Linksys E4200 loaded with Tomato). All these WiFi clients are running eyeBeam (in case you're wondering where the calls come

In squid we use a double layer of hashed directories on the FS to allow storage of millions of files. I was reading the "Directory hashing" section but never understood it.. since it's written.. in a way I could not understand. I am using this line: mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir/ and I want to migrate to a hash based directory scheme. While trying to understand

Hey, What do you mean by doesn't do forking? It allows forking processes if the application can do that. It doesn't fork them by default but ,is it really needed? If xenstored is testing to be run under systemd and not forks itself because of it, that's another thing. Eliezer On 09/09/2015 12:40, George Dunlap wrote: > I think because systemd doesn't do forking, that it

what file system are you using?? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly.? might also check cables, often a problem particularly if they are older sata cables being run at a possibly

I have been running CentOS and I have found out that there is a key that is not defined well. The "a" or "?" which actually causes by a button press to a sing which is called "new shekel" or "Shekel Chadash" which is two letters together. What can I do to fix it? maybe someone have seen this in the past? Eliezer

Hi, Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue. My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp, however I'm not receiving anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG,

I was learning about the different FS exists. I was working on systems that ReiserFS was the star but since there is no longer support from the creator there are other consolidations to be done. I want to ask about couple FS options. EXT4 which is amazing for one node but for more it's another story. I have heard about GFS2 and GlusterFS and read the docs and official materials from RH on

Now that 7.4 CR has delivered OpenSSL 1.0.2, I should be able to serve http/2 pages to Chrome, but I still see messages that ALPN is not enabled. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is installed: $ rpm -qa |grep openssl openssl-libs-1.0.2k-8.el7.x86_64 openssl-1.0.2k-8.el7.x86_64 But https://tools.keycdn.com/http2-test says "www.stevenstern.me" supports http 2 but ALPN is not supported. Ideas? Does

When I VNC into 7.4 everything is fine until I run vmplayer (VMware). The vmplayer runs but when I type on the console for vmplayer which is also running a centos image I get multiple key presses - sometimes. Its not everytime - but enough to be annoying. How do I take care of that ? Jerry

Hello. Dovecot is not binding or listening on port 993 when I start it. $ sudo netstat -tlnp | grep -c 993 0 Dovecot starts fine and runs without complaints. $ sudo service dovecot restart Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecot. $ sudo tail /var/log/mail.log Apr 4 13:42:39 mwjones dovecot: master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=16238 uid=0 code=kill) Apr 4 13:42:39 mwjones

I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config. I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect anything. ifcfg-eth0: GATEWAY=192.168.1.254 IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=no BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 BOOTPROTO=none NAME="" NM_CONTROLLED=yes MACADDR="" TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 MTU="1500"

I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server. This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp connections. The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all. I have seen couple guides\tutorials on the internet: - https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/IPSEC_L2TP_vpn_on_CentOS_-_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_Scientific_-_Linux_6.html -

I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down inside the machine. I want to compile software on a Xeon SERVER. The basic issue is that there is a recommendation to not compile it as a root user. I have compiled software as a root user more then once and I am not sure why would there is a need to run it as non-root user? I have taken a look at the /proc/ FS but I do

On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > > On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >> gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the >> incoming device " > > I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and > everything that Gordon (and