similar to: SELinux AVC problem postfix <-> dspam

Hi: I have been using Dovecot for well over a year now and it has always worked with few problems. The mail setup is not simple... Postfix+MailScanner+ClamAV+Docvecot+MySql+postfix.admin... just to mention the major things. The system is CentOS 5.3 on VMware. The maildir is on an NFS share, index and control is local. About a month ago I thought I upgraded from 1.1.x to 1.2.x. by doing an

On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting >> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >> > Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the > following? > > grep avc

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

I recently setup my Puppetmaster server to run through Passenger via Apache instead of on the default webrick web server. SELinux made that not work and I've found some documentation on making rules to allow it however mine won't load. This is the policy I found via this website, http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/2012/01/20/selinux-passenger-and-puppet-oh-my/comment-page-1/ . module

On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting > needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . > Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the following? grep avc /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow #============= amavis_t ============== allow

On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean >>> setting >>> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >>> >> Anyone see any problem

Gordon, Thank you for your help on this. Still not working... On 04/26/2017 06:27 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, >> it seems > > > A bug report would probably be helpful. > > I'm looking back at the message you wrote describing errors in >

Hi, since 4.12 Samba SELinux context for /var/run/samba is not correct anymore: ``` root at files:~ # ls -la -Z /var/run/samba/ total 12 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 160 Apr 3 20:42 . drwxr-xr-x. 30 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 1000 Apr 3 18:39 .. drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 60 Apr 3 18:39 ncalrpc drwxr-xr-x. 2 root

On 3 Apr 2020, at 21:53, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/04/2020 20:34, Tobias Kirchhofer via samba wrote: >> Hi, since 4.12 Samba SELinux context for /var/run/samba is not >> correct anymore: >> >> ``` >> root at files:~ # ls -la -Z /var/run/samba/ >> total 12 >> drwxr-xr-x.? 5 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0? 160 Apr 3 >>

On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, > it seems A bug report would probably be helpful. I'm looking back at the message you wrote describing errors in ld-2.17.so. I think what's happening is that the policy on your system includes a silent rule that somehow breaks your system. You'll need

Installed Packages Name : postfix Arch : x86_64 Epoch : 2 Version : 2.6.6 Release : 6.el6_5 Size : 9.7 M Repo : installed >From repo : updates I am seeing several of these in our maillog file after a restart of the Postfix service: Apr 23 12:48:27 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp from 'read, write'

Trying to restart postfix installed from yum. Restart fails, I get: type=AVC msg=audit(1430429813.721:12167): avc: denied { unlink } for pid=31624 comm="master" name="defer" dev="dm-0" ino=981632 scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_master_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:postfix_spool_maildrop_t:s0 tclass=sock_file I guess it needs to remove the

I am installing a new Samba 4.2 Active Directory server on CentOS 7. I followed the Wiki instructions on how to create the server. I am using sernet-samba 4.2 binaries. Everything seems to be OK on the Linux side but I cannot get any windows client to successfully join the domain. Each attempt returns the following error message "RPC Server in not available". Below are the config file

On Mon, December 8, 2014 20:01, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > rpm -q selinux-policy > > selinux-policy-3.7.19-260.el6 is the current policy in development. >> Thank you. >>>> #============= postfix_showq_t ============== >>>> allow postfix_showq_t tmp_t:dir read; >>> Any reason postfix would be listing the contents of /tmp or /var/tmp? >>>

Hello CentOS Docs People! I recently used the Amavisd howto to setup a couple of mailservers, which saved me from hours of searching online and reading novels of documentation. Since Ned is taking a little break from the Amavisd page, I would like to help contribute. There were a few things I'd like to add, like GTUBE/EICAR testing and SELinux config lines. My wiki username is WilliamFong.

V?Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:34:42PM -0700,?Jordan Erickson napsal(a): > On 10/16/23 10:37, Michael C Cambria wrote: > > I'm using icecast via Fedora 37 package and systemd service to start. > > > > I've added multiple <listen-socket> but get: > > > > "EROR connection/connection_setup_sockets Could not create listener > > socket on port

Not a problem ... sharing a solution (this time)! Please correct my understanding of the process, if required. "i_stream_read() failed: Permission denied" is an error message generated when a large-ish file (>128kb in my case) is attached to a message that has been passed to Dovecot's deliver program when SELinux is being enforced. In my case, these messages are first run

Darned thing is suddenly failing. We had a reboot last night, and I changed a couple of files today too, so either one could somehow be responsible. But I can''t figure out how from this crash. First I noticed that my changes weren''t updating. Then I noticed that puppet wasn''t running. Then I found that it won''t, in fact, run. /selinux contains only a

Hello, I was wondering if any one has seen issues with selinux name_bind denials that result from having IP:PORT bindings for services to specific IP addresses managed on an interface under NetworkManager's control? I do realize that people will probably say stop using NetworkManager, and I may, but the behavior is strange, and I'd like to have a better understanding of what's going

I have some centos 4.4 server. i have disable selinux for some software problem: # cat /etc/selinux/config # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. # disabled - SELinux is fully disabled. SELINUX=disable #