similar to: Directories recursive deletion problem

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > >The main hint I would like to give to the MooseFS developers is to get > >ping_pong -rw working. If you need any assistance in setting that up > >and getting arguments on why this is important, let us know! > > > >With best regards, > > > >Volker > > Any arguments that I can pass on would

Hello All, I am currently having an issue with my samba PDC. I have recently updated to 3.6.5 Samba, and have made what i believe to be the correct changes in my config to account for the changes to the idmap system. My setup is as follows, SAMBA PDC on RHEL 6.2, which authenticates passwords through Kerberos, and Deals with user profiles via LDAP. I had about 25 Windows clients which were able

Hi list, i'm have samba installed at debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 :~# dpkg -l | grep samba ii samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix ii samba-common 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2 common files used by both the Samba server and client ii samba-common-bin 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2

Hello, I use Debian Squeeze with Samba 3.5.6. I do experience problems that might be related to those described in bug 7892 that can be found found here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7892 I could not find any information about this bug being fixed in Samba 3.5.x. In the realease notes of Samba 3.4.10 I found this: '* BUG 7892: Fix stale lock in open_file_fchmod().' As

I am trying to build Samba 3.5.6 on an HP-UX 11.11 system, and I get this error: Compiling libsmb/libsmb_thread_impl.c In file included from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss.h:54, from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss_config.h:49, from ./../nsswitch/winbind_client.h:1, from include/includes.h:681, from libsmb/libsmb_thread_impl.c:20:

Many of my clients installed kb2536276 on their windows client and can no longer connect to my samba server. Their sessions don't even get logged. I upgraded to 3.5.9 on my test server with no luck. Encrypted with local authentication to the smbpassword file seems to work fine, but I need the servers running non encrypted samba to work. I'm running 3.5.6 on AIX 5.3 using PAM auth and

I just upgraded an HP-UX 11.23 IA 64 server to Samba 3.5.6, and one of the shares would not work. It showed up in testparm as valid, but nobody could connect to it. I shortened the length of the share name from 12 to 8 characters, and it now works. My pc is running Vista, and authentication is via our domain controllers. Is this a limit within Samba, or is it something being imposed by Windows?

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

Hello from Germany, I have a problem with the following constellation: A Samba-Fileserver - Samba 3.5.6 - running in a Windows AD as a member server using idmap_ad for the mapping the User-IDs. This all works fine as long as the LDAP-port 389 is available on the domain controllers. Now, our AD admin wants to close this and move over to LDAPS. And here is my problem. How do I configure my Samba

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Dear I'm using samba 3.5.6 + PDC and connected to LDAP directory In log level 1 there is many entries like this : Feb 18 18:24:54 samba smbd[5285]: lp_bool(): value is NULL or empty! Feb 18 18:27:15 samba smbd[6817]: [2011/02/18 18:27:15.371644, 0] param/loadparm.c:5856(lp_bool) Feb 18 18:27:15 samba smbd[6817]: lp_bool(): value is NULL or empty! Feb 18 18:27:32 samba net:

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hai, maybe it's a bit early to ask, but is there a date when 3.2.2 wil be released. thanx. Louis

I am trying to set up a caching link between two points, that can be shared with windows and *nix. In both locations, I have linux-based servers with data, which have caching NFS mounts (that is, mount -t nfs -o fsc, with cachefilesd). These mounts are working correctly and I have tested the cache locally to much success. What I have not been able to get working is sharing those mounts with

I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :) So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6 atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6. With FDX fast

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

My name is Kenji Ichinoseki and I am in charge of a project at Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc. Please give me cooperation by all means about the affair in the account of a title. Now, I included "Samba 3.0.37" in the Linux system currently developed (us). And it is testing using "smbtorture(samba3.5.8 source4) ". The point in question was found in our entry of this test. It

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,