similar to: Graphs using R

Hi, Please suggest a method to answer below questions: Factory_ID Factory_Location Factory_Size Total_Sample Good_Sample Fair_Sample Bad_Sample ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 City_A

Hope this should be simple: I have a User model and a Role model. Factories for each. When I create a User using FG, I want to assign a specific role. Cant seem to figure out how to do this, getting errors like: uninitialized constant SysadminRole for doing things this way: Factory.define :user do |u| u.practice_id { |a| a.association(:practice).id } u.password ''password1''

Hello, I wanted to know how to load dummy data in the application using Factory girl. I had done this using Fixtures.I had made a fixtures folder into the test folder and run the command "rake test fixtures:load" Currently i tried using factories in the spec which is working fine. Wanted to know know regarding loading dummy data. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I am trying to test factory girl associations basically I have a user model and status model , what is supposed to happen is a user has many statuses and a status belongs to a user. I have tried to model this in factory girl as you can see in the files. When I try to execute the test I get Failure/Error: visit("/users/#{user.id}/statuses/#{status.id}")

Hello everyone, We are in the middle of porting the majority of zorg to GitHub/monorepo. The following build factories will be ported and if you use one of those for your bots, you are all covered: * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots) * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11

I think what she is referring to was that the build seemed to be triggered by a commit to a project that shouldn't trigger builds on a libcxx bot (i.e. the change was in llvm). I have a somewhat orthogonal but related question. In the past, commits to compiler-rt did not trigger builds on llvm/clang/sanitizer bots. Has this behaviour been rectified with the move to github? I am really sorry

Hi, i''m getting the following error when running a spec on my controller for my Equipment model. it "edit action should render edit template" do get :edit, :id => Factory(:equipment) response.should render_template(:edit) end Failure/Error: get :edit, :id => Factory(:equipment) ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: The test

Hi Galina, It seems that our libcxx bots are now triggering builds for any changes to llvm: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux/builds/2434 Should I file a bug report for this? Thanks, Diana On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:36, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The staging master is

Hello build bot owners! The staging master is ready. Please feel free to use it to make sure your bots would work well with the monorepo and github. The following builders could be configured to build monorepo: * clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel * clang-native-arm-lnt-perf * clang-cmake-armv7-lnt * clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon * clang-cmake-armv7-quick * clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel *

Hello Marco, Welcome aboard! slaves.py keeps the build slaves definitions, builders.py keeps the builders definitions. You have to have both. The steps of adding a new slave is here: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html. Please make sure you done the step # 10 before bringing your slave up, otherwise it wouldn't be authorized by the master and will be blacklisted after multiple

Galina, thanks again for your help. I have cooked a new patch that should make a bit more sense. I have added the new builder under _get_experimental_scheduled_builders(), as the comment above that function suggested me it would be a good idea. :) Does it look a reasonable start? Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies,

Hi Folks, I hope you''re doing good. Sorry for a long email. I am just trying my best to learn something new and, need your help to understand/ sort a small issue which I am not able to figure out. I have create couple of factories and created some examples for rspec for one of my projects. I have got everything working on my local. Even, my specs are green on local for both ruby

Thank you. Alexei just committed the change to SVN. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM,

Hello list, I've got a whole lot of these in my debug log : [Apr 18 15:12:44] DEBUG[26973] audiohook.c: Read factory 0x1cea33a0 and write factory 0x1cea3dd8 both fail to provide 160 samples [Apr 18 15:12:44] DEBUG[26973] audiohook.c: Failed to get 160 samples from read factory 0x1cea33a0 [Apr 18 15:12:44] DEBUG[26973] audiohook.c: Read factory 0x1cea33a0 and write factory 0x1cea3dd8 both

I''m having trouble understanding what the assigns() method does, as described at the following link: http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/modeling-and-viewing-users-two#sec:better_user_views The User model has been ''rake db:test:prepare''ed, but I checked and no records were copied to the test db after doing that. Yet the description of assigns() says that the code:

Hi all, I'd like to be able to use TargetTransformInfo to make architecture specific code generation decisions from the XLA LLVM IR emitter[0]. However, we don't have a great way to do this today -- TargetTransformInfo is wrapped in a TargetIRAnalysis and getting the TargetTransformInfo out of it requires something like: FunctionAnalysisManager DummyFAM; TTI = TIRA.run(F, DummyFAM);

One of our client facing this issue, we have try to solve it but we're lack of asterisk knowledge. Anybody can help us? Isn't any problem with asterisk configuration or the problem come from PRI E1 itself? [Apr 11 15:32:48] VERBOSE[9231] chan_dahdi.c: -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH [Apr 11 15:32:48] DEBUG[6888] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for channel

Hello, I see a lot of these messages in the debug log : /[May 3 15:47:09] DEBUG[19081] audiohook.c: Failed to get 160 samples from write factory 0xae17e18 [May 3 15:47:09] DEBUG[19081] audiohook.c: Failed to get 160 samples from write factory 0xae17e18 [May 3 15:47:09] DEBUG[19081] audiohook.c: Read factory 0xae173e0 and write factory 0xae17e18 both fail to provide 160 samples [May 3

Hi every body our Calls are begging dropped for no reason and it starts with the sound quality dropping and then the caller unable to hear our call center agents. Then the call drops or the caller hangs up unable to hear. I could see following lines inside full log ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Jan 20 15:21:35] DEBUG[14982] audiohook.c:

Hi, I am having a difficulty with getting two realtime user?s to bridge on answer. I have managed successfully to bridge the same two users/channels via the Bridge Manager api command and confirm that the two communicate directly bypassing the asterisk server (I confirmed this with Wireshark). Does anyone have some ideas? I have put some log entries below. I haven?t attached my