similar to: Ops.factor(point1, point2) : - not meaningful for factors

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Ops.factor(point1, point2) : - not meaningful for factors"

2008 Nov 10
2
how to convert indvidual pairwise distances to matrix
Hello, I am trying to convert list of pairwise distances to a distance matrix for spatial analysis (kriging). For instance, I have something like this for each pair pf points, and I want to convert it to a matrix: point1 point2 distance 1 1 0 1 2 4 2 2 0 2 1 4 Please let me know if there is a
2008 Jun 09
1
Plot Coloured Triangle
Hi there, I'd like to plot a triangle with each point having a certain color defined and fill it with the interpolated values. The following code shall represent somehow, three points with x,y, and the "amount" of red for example... point1 <- c(1.1, 1.7, 255) point2 <- c(2.2, 1.5, 180) point3 <- c(1.8, 2.2, 60) can anybody give me a hint which methods to use to realize
2011 Apr 11
3
Geographic distance between lat-long points in R?
Dear R, I have a bunch of geographic locations specified by lat-long coordinates. What's an easy way to calculate geographic distance between any two points? OR, perhaps there is a function for calculating a distance matrix for K sites? Sincerely, Scott Chamberlain [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Jul 01
5
Generating correlated data from uniform distribution
Dear R users, I want to generate two random variables (X1, X2) from uniform distribution (-0.5, 0.5) with a specified correlation coefficient r. Does anyone know how to do it in R? Many thanks! Menghui
2000 Jun 15
0
__MSBROWSE__ inconsistency
Linux 2.2.14, samba 2.0.7 Summary: samba kept __MSBROWSE__ registered but thought it was not the master browser. Details: 1) samba started and became master browser (6/13/2000 0.00) 2) then there was a problem on the network (I played with ipchains...) 3) samba received an announce from a win9x pc claiming it was MB (6/13/2000 circa 8.00AM) Due to the problems of point2, the election that
2001 Aug 08
1
Strategy for creating a palette...?
Dear all, I'm generally not a big fan of GUIs, but I have just discovered one thing where a GUI would be a nice thing: creating color palettes. I'm creating an "image", for transparencies for a lecture I'm giving, so this is going to look great... :-) What I'm out for, is to make green tones and red tones, and a relatively sharp break between them. This break will
2006 Jan 09
2
catch id from form and copy between objects
Hi all, Not completely sure what I''m doing, but I need to get data from another table based on and id. Below is some breakpointer output: irb> @params => {"project"=>{"project_description"=>"point2", "project_name"=>"break2"}, "action"=>"create_project",
2001 May 15
1
Is comment order meaningful?
The spec seems to be unclear on this: should two comment haeders who only differ in the order of comments be considered equevalent? VCE shows comments in the order read and allows to store them in any order (it has move up/down buttons). Comment editors with a fixed layout (like the commmon TITLE/ARTIST/etc. fields in PP's winamp plugin) don't show the order and give no control of it.
2018 Dec 06
0
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
On 12/5/18 11:55 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario. > When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other, > and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For > the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and ext4 so it's as simple as > possible. I used my test
2000 Nov 11
1
Meaningful encoder testing
Ross Levis <ross@soulfm.cjb.net> wrote: > and submitted which show up problems in the LAME encoder. I thought > Velvet.wav was on the list but I just checked and couldn't find it so I > presume LAME has fixed the problem. I guess Monty has gone through the You can get velvet.wav from here: http://r3mix.50g.com/velvet.zip (2MB) Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List
2003 Dec 22
1
[R] lattice: levelplot: error: min not meaningful for factor (PR#6005)
R 1.8.1: ___COMMAND____________________________________________ levelplot( yield ~ year * variety | site, barley ) ___ERROR_MESSAGE______________________________________ Error in Summary.factor(..., na.rm = na.rm) : "min" not meaningful for factors ___COMMENT____________________________________________ levelplot( yield ~ as.numeric(year) * as.numeric(variety) | site,
2003 Dec 22
0
(PR#6005) Re: [R] lattice: levelplot: error: min not meaningful
Actually, this is supposed to work (and is given as an example in my DSC-2003 paper), and at some point, did. It seems this was broken as a consequence of a careless change in panel.levelplot. The first 5 lines should have been label.style <- match.arg(label.style) x <- as.numeric(x[subscripts]) y <- as.numeric(y[subscripts]) minXwid <- min(diff(sort(unique(x))))
2015 Sep 29
0
making object.size() more meaningful on environments?
Herve, The problem then would be that for A a refClass whose fields take up N bytes (in the sense that you mean), if we do B <- A A and B would look like the BOTH take up N bytes, for a total of 2N, whereas AFAIK R would only be using ~ N + 2*56 bytes, right? ~G On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently object.size()
2010 Sep 05
1
Warning messages: not meaningful for factors
Dear Experts, I need to include the repeated structure in our data set object, recall.sums.df, before using gls function. Thus I used groupedData. But I encountered error messages which may mean '*' is not not meaningful factor. Please let me know what I have to do. Thanks, Jeong > recall.sums.df[0:10, ] recall.values recall.ind subj replication hemi region group 1 17.515
2003 Jan 02
1
aggregate: "sum" not meaningful for factors
Dear all, I try to summarise my data per category using aggregate, but for some reason I get the error message "sum" not meaningful for factors even though my vector is numeric. The data set is shown below. Could someone please give a hint. Thanks in advance! Sincerely, Tord > names(test) [1] "ObjektID" "tallstubbyta" > is.factor(test$ObjektID);
2006 Jul 13
6
creating meaningful urls, (changing default)
Hi, Urls in ruby are as defualt set to :controller/:action/:id How can I change it to somthing like this :controller/:action/:id/#random title# #random title# may be a variable or taken from a field in the database thanks scott -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2008 Jun 04
1
"& not meaningful for factors"
I am trying to define groupings from levels of factor variables and this the warning message that R give "& not meaningful for factors". The nature of my task is this. I have a variable stage which has the levels (1B, 2A, 2B) - these are the AJCC TNM stages of cancer, and another variable diameter with factor levels ("=< 4", "4 - 6.5, > 6.5; limit values are
2010 Dec 14
1
rpart - how to estimate the “meaningful” predictors for an outcome (in classification trees)
Hi dear R-help memebers, When building a CART model (specifically classification tree) using rpart, it is sometimes obvious that there are variables (X's) that are meaningful for predicting some of the outcome (y) variables - while other predictors are relevant for other outcome variables (y's only). *How can it be estimated, which explanatory variable is "used" for which of
2012 Dec 17
1
Adding a parameter to dovecot's deliver to get a meaningful return value
Hi, First, please forgive me as I'm not subscribed to the list. I'm using Dovecot 2 (2.1.7) for serving my local maildir. This maildir is filled by an external process, fetching & merging mails from different sources that's outside this scope (but it's working). Dovecot is thus acting as a MTA, but more as a MDA. I've a web client running on the server, and it connects
2015 Sep 29
1
making object.size() more meaningful on environments?
Hi Gabe, On 09/29/2015 02:51 PM, Gabriel Becker wrote: > Herve, > > The problem then would be that for A a refClass whose fields take up N > bytes (in the sense that you mean), if we do > > B <- A > > A and B would look like the BOTH take up N bytes, for a total of 2N, > whereas AFAIK R would only be using ~ N + 2*56 bytes, right? Yes, but that's still a *much*