similar to: Identifying duplicate rows?

I think the following may provide a clearer explanation: subs <- c(1,3) DFA <- data.frame(id = 1:3) ar <- array(1:12, c(3,2,2)) ## yielding > ar , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5 [3,] 3 6 , , 2 [,1] [,2] [1,] 7 10 [2,] 8 11 [3,] 9 12 ## array subscripting gives > ar[subs,,] , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 3 6 , , 2

I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I updated the patch. It should be ok now. Ivan On 27/06/2012 21:42, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Committed in r159281. > > -Anshu > > > On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> Hi Anshu, >> >> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just >> checked it.

So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported somewhere else? Thanks! Georg? ? ? Gesendet:?Dienstag, 09. Mai 2023 um 19:28 Uhr Von:?"Bert Gunter" <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> An:?"Georg Kindermann" <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> Cc:?"Rui Barradas" <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, r-help at r-project.org Betreff:?Re: [R] data.frame

I really don't know. I would call it a request for extended capabilities of [.data.frame, rather than a feature or bug. But maybe wiser heads than mine who monitor this list can sort it out. -- Bert On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 8:52?PM Georg Kindermann <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> wrote: > So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported > somewhere else? >

Hi Anshu, Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ? I can fix it if that's the problem. Ivan On 20/06/2012 19:33, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > > > Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass > and I fixed the violation of column numbers. > > Great. Looks good to me. > >

Hi Anshu, Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. On 15/06/2012 21:31, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: > > +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, > Add a top level comment describing the function > > + std::map<State*,

> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. Great. Looks good to me. > IMO, it wil be nice to keep it alive for performance comparisons. Given the overall performance > is rather determined by transition searches on the current state, for small DFA tables may not be a win > and it may still be the case for

Hi, I am R beginner and am trying to figure out how to generate a complete list of species for every point, visit, and year. The code below is close but does not give me a list of species for every point, visit, and year in my data set. spplist<-unique(sumPtCt$Species) spplength<-length(spplist) Pointlist<-unique(sumPtCt$Point) Pointlength<-length(Pointlist)

Dear list members, when I create a data.frame containing an array I had expected, that I get a similar result, when subsetting it, like having a matrix in a data.frame. But instead I get only the first element and not all values of the remaining dimensions. Differences are already when creating the data.frame, where I can use `I` in case of a matrix but for an array I am only able to insert it in

Committed in r159281. -Anshu On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi Anshu, > > I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just > checked it. Could you please commit it? > > Ivan > > On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The

Hi Ivan, Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit. Thanks -Anshu > Hi Anshu, > > Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to > commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ? > I can fix it if that's the problem. > > Ivan > > On

Hi Ivan, The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, Add a top level comment describing the function + std::map<State*, std::set<Transition*, ltTransition>, ltState> stateTransitions; You should be able to use SmallSet here. Also, this line exceeds 80 columns. On a related note, is the CachedTable mechanism in

Hi Anshu, Thanks again for your feedbacks. On 24/08/2012 17:01, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Hi Ivan, > >> I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I >> updated the patch. It should be ok now. >> Thanks Anshu! >> >> I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the >> generation time became painfully long. In

Hi Anshu, I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just checked it. Could you please commit it? Ivan On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks > good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit. > > Thanks > -Anshu

Hi Ivan, > I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I > updated the patch. It should be ok now. > Thanks Anshu! > > I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the > generation time became painfully long. In fact, the main problem was > in writeTableAndAPI(). I propose another patch to fix it: > - Fixed memory leaks. > -

Ivan, Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the removal of the Transition class: > (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure in State (input, state) to replace them? Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in State instead of TransitionSet. Thanks -Anshu On 8/25/2012 6:42 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi

Hal, On 6/11/2012 12:48 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Ignoring compile time for a moment, I think an advantage of a DFA is modeling a situation where the hardware can assign resources to best fit the entire group rather then one instruction at a time. For example, if InstA requires either Unit0 or Unit1, and InstB requires Unit0, is {InstA, InstB} a valid group? Depending on your cpu, a DFA could

On 28/08/2012 00:21, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Ivan, > > Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the > removal of the Transition class: > > > (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure > in State (input, state) to replace them? > > Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in > State

Dear R helpers: Sorry to bother for a basic question about model.matrix. Basically, I want to apply the dummy coding rule in a dataframe with complete factor levels to another dataframe with incomplete factor levels. I used model.matrix, but could not get what I want. The following is an example. #Suppose I have two dataframe A and B

Hi, I've performed an lda and obtained a classification table for some of my data: > efa.dfa<-lda(groups~.,efa.scores.8,CV=T) > str(efa.dfa) List of 5 $ class : Factor w/ 2 levels "1","2": 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 ... $ posterior: num [1:160, 1:2] 0.99083 0.00852 0.93983 0.23186 0.85931 ... ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 .. ..$ : chr [1:160]