similar to: methods cbind2 bind_activation disrupts cbind everywhere

Hi all, this question has already been posted on stackoverflow, however without success, see also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27886535/proper-way-to-use-cbind-rbind-with-s4-classes-in-package. I have written a package using S4 classes and would like to use the functions rbind, cbind with these defined classes. Since it does not seem to be possible to define rbind and cbind directly as S4

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:39:37 -0800 writes: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Mario Annau > <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, this question has already been posted on >> stackoverflow, however without success, see also >>

Are you able to create a reproducible example, somehow? Thanks, Michael On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > I've tested your change in r67699 (using r67773) and the function now > correctly dispatches to r/cbind2 within the R-session without > bind_activation(TRUE). However, running unit tests using R CMD check I

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Sun, 1 Feb 2015 19:23:06 -0800 writes: > I've implemented the proposed changes in > R-devel. Minimally tested, so please try it. It should > delegate to r/cbind2 when there is at least one S4 > argument and S3 dispatch fails (so you'll probably want to

>>>>> Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> >>>>> on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:18:53 +0100 writes: > sorry - I just got irritated by my different R-versions. > The behaviour I described in the previous mail was discovered using R > 3.1.2 without bind_activation(TRUE). In r67773 all calls are delegated > to r/cbind.matrix and not

As some of you may have seen / heard in the past, it is not possible to make cbind() and rbind() into proper S4 generic functions, since their first formal argument is '...'. [ BTW: S3-methods for these of course only dispatch on the first argument which is also not really satisfactory in the context of many possible matrix classes.] For this reason, after quite some discussion on

Dear List, I'm struggling with the signature writing cbind/rbind functions for a S4 class. First of all, I'm very happy that it is now possible to dispatch on ... I follow the example for "paste" in ?dotMethods, which works as far as this: ### start example setClass ("cbtest", representation = representation (data = "data.frame"),

Dear all, As far as I understand, the number of arguments in methods:::cbind is limited by the "self recursive" construction of the function which generates nested loops. A workaround could be to use the internal cbind function on blocks of non S4 objects. The limitation would then be reduced to the number of consecutive S4 objects. ##### R code ##### dfr <- data.frame(matrix(0,

I've implemented the proposed changes in R-devel. Minimally tested, so please try it. It should delegate to r/cbind2 when there is at least one S4 argument and S3 dispatch fails (so you'll probably want to add an S3 method for your class to introduce a conflict, otherwise it will dispatch to cbind.data.frame if one of the args is a data.frame). There may no longer be a need for cBind() and

Hi Michael, I've tested your change in r67699 (using r67773) and the function now correctly dispatches to r/cbind2 within the R-session without bind_activation(TRUE). However, running unit tests using R CMD check I figured out that the same function call delegates to r/cbind.matrix (function uses S4 class as first- and matrix as second argument). Is this a bug and/or how can I get function

sorry - I just got irritated by my different R-versions. The behaviour I described in the previous mail was discovered using R 3.1.2 without bind_activation(TRUE). In r67773 all calls are delegated to r/cbind.matrix and not r/cbind2. As a workaround I have now implemented an S3 method for my S4 class which correctly dispatches for both versions (3.1.2 and r67699+) - see also the commit for the h5

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > this question has already been posted on stackoverflow, however without > success, see also > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27886535/proper-way-to-use-cbind-rbind-with-s4-classes-in-package. > > I have written a package using S4 classes and would like to use the > functions

In a newly downloaded version (today) of R-2-4-0alpha, with all packages from CRAN also installed today, I get: > library(Matrix) Erro en loadNamespace(package, c(which.lib.loc, lib.loc), keep.source = keep.source) : in 'Matrix' methods specified for export, but none defined: BIC, anova, coef, confint, deviance, fitted, fixef, formula, head, lmer, logLik, mcmcsamp, plot,

This was originally a bug report about Matrix, https://r-forge.r-project.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=294&aid=6325&group_id=61 but the bug is rather a "design" bug in R, or a limitation. This e-mail is a report of the status quo as I see it, and call for comments, sugguests, help/hints for workarounds, or even a suggestion for a programming task helping R core to amend

Hi, I think this is a bug (even though I can't find documentation explicitly saying that it should work). Basically, Rf_PrintValue(obj) fails when 'obj' is an S4 object that should be printed using show() rather than print(). From the error message I'm guessing that the need to use show is detected correctly but then show is not found. "cbind2" in the code below is just

>From a small thread over at the 'R-package-devel' mailing list, this now goes to the R-devel mailing list (CC'ing the original R-package-devel very exceptionally). Note that I, as maintainer("Matrix") had introduced rBind() and cBind() to be used for Matrix package matrices as substitute for rbind() and cbind() because back then it was not reasonably possible to

>>>>> "SH" == Scott Hyde <hydes at byuh.edu> >>>>> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:59:00 -1000 (HST) writes: SH> Martin, How does Matrix implement augmented matrices? I SH> tried this and got the expected result: {Replying to R-help, since this question has come up several times } >> V=matrix(1,2,3) >> V=cbind(V,V)

Hi, I have sparse (tridiagonal) matrices, and I use the Matrix package for handling them. For certain computations, I need to either set the first row to zero, or double the last row. I find that neither operation preserves sparsity, eg > m <- Diagonal(5) > m 5 x 5 diagonal matrix of class "ddiMatrix" [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 1 . . . . [2,] . 1

>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>> on Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:42:13 -0700 writes [to me (as maintainer of 'Matrix') and allowed me to answer in public] : > I ran into a problem where 'R CMD check' on my in-house package, which > only indirectly depends on 'Matrix', produce errors like: > > [where=<environment: namespace:Matrix>,

Dear all, #Last week, I asked about merge x and y as list. #Now I have a dataset with list of list like: x <- list(list(matrix(1:20, 5, 4),matrix(1:20, 5, 4)), list(matrix(1:20, 5, 4),matrix(1:20, 5, 4))) y <- list(list(c(1, -1, -1, 1, 1),c(1, 1, -1, -1, -1)), list(c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1),c(1, 1, -1, 1, -1))) x y #I need merge x and y, I have tried with list.uni <-