similar to: SuSE Linux Enterprise Server OpenSSH 5.1p1 nagle issue?

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

Hello, I'm trying to use http from syslinux.efi but it fails while trying to establish the connection to a FreeBSD http server. A packet capture shows: TCP healthd > http [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1094 TSecr=0 TCP http > healthd [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1596927428 TSecr=1094 TCP healthd > http [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=2097152

So I might have been misinterpreting things here and might be way off base. I think you can ignore this thread and I'll follow up if I get anything concrete down the road =) The retranmissions I'm seeing and reproducing are probably within normal allowances and can't reproduce the issue that originally lead me down this path. - Nathan > -----Original Message----- > From:

Hello, I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these threads: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html http://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/mailman/message/33236100/ I'm now getting further to almost being able

Hi Rowland, Sorry to inform that none of thus packages solve my problem. But today, with some Tranquil.it helps, I have some news: - Upgrade from 4.11.14 -> 4.12.9 is OK - Upgrade from 4.12.9 -> 4.13.2 : problem is present with Tranquil.it AND Louis package - Fresh install + member join with 4.13.2 is OK (Centos AND Buster packages) Problem only occur when upgrading member to 4.13.2 with

We are running Samba-4.6.6 and are running into an issue where it negotiates to a NetApp server but then the client stops the connection. 8262 2017-10-12 09:32:16.198917 10.136.78.14 10.128.101.128 TCP 66 45848 → 445 [FIN, ACK] Seq=403 Ack=581 Win=16768 Len=0 TSval=11546007 TSecr=3316317046 This is at a customer site, and we cannot recreate it here due to

We get STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER failures when smbclient uses SMB2 but passes with NT1. We do get some success, but mostly failures. It appears to happen after it transfers the PDF file. These are the packets leading up to SMB2 failing after the transfer: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 266 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688568000

Hello! Has anybody experienced network latency problems with combination of Windows 7, GPLPV drivers and RDP connection? Any Windows pop-up message(such as "command not found" error message in "Run command:" dialog, or dividing by zero in windows calc) causes a short freeze of RDP session and looks like that from dom0: PING 192.168.44.65 (192.168.44.65) 56(84) bytes of data.

Hi I have been using evolution/cyrus/exim for 10 years - until yesterday! I upgraded to C6.7 and now there is no way I can find of connecting from evo to the cyrus imap(s) server [root at maui:~]$ ps -ef|grep imap cyrus 27768 1 0 15:21 ? 00:00:00 /usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-master -d cyrus 27775 27768 0 15:21 ? 00:00:00 imapd -s cyrus 27779 27768 0 15:21 ?

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:06:13 +0000 "Tompkins, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Re-sending ... We tend to see a lot of issues with NetApp servers and > SMB 311. Not sure what might be wrong with their response packet, > that 4.6.6 doesn't like. > > ~ Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

I live in New Brunswick Canada. The phone company is Aliant. When you set up business service here, you can go with either analog or digital lines. This isn't a T1 or ISDN. They are talking individual lines direct to handsets that they provide. They offer the digital option with even very small ( 2 - 4) number of lines. What technology could this be? Is there any way to connect such a

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > As far as I can see (... well, guess), lpxelinux.0 uses the TCP > implementation under core/lwip/, which doesn't support TCP timestamps. > > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: > > if ( ( flags & TCP_SYN ) || tcp->timestamps

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 20:24:36 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > > Am 11.08.2015 um 17:56 schrieb Dr J Austin: >> Hi >> >> I have been using evolution/cyrus/exim for 10 years - until >> yesterday! >> >> I upgraded to C6.7 and now there is no way I can find of

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I think that is what Andrew is trying to tell you, the printer needs to > support SASL over TLS/SSL or it will never work. I don't think there is > anything you can do, but I am surprised that the print doesn't already > support it, after all, it isn't something new ;-) Mi confusion grow. ;-) As stated in my

Hi! This little patch turns bitwise.c's mask[] lookup table into a bit-twiddling macro (which avoids the <<32 case without branching). This spares the size of the 132-byte lookup table (and then a bit more, curiously). While I expected this to generally be faster (because it uses a few more instructions in place of a table lookup), it's actually slightly slower than the LUT, in a

hi all I found that in the revision 10730 of the libogg2 library it is impossible to do bitpacking. this is due to the implementation of the (at least) two functions oggpack_writeinit() and oggpack_readinit(). they both take an (oggpack_buffer *) as an argument and immediately erase all it's contents: void oggpack_readinit(oggpack_buffer *b,ogg_reference *r){ memset(b,0,sizeof(*b));