similar to: Change DNS method?

It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4 /usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4 We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3 and still using internal dns. Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have to migrate to bind9. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018

Thanks a lot for your help so far. The main reason I do not use vms is that the server is pretty limited in RAM so this would only be my last resort. To prevent confusion: srv.wie (192.168.1.50) is the same machine as smb.wie (192.168.1.55), I seperated them just now to debug the problem. > These look like they are being run on the DC, what about from the > windows clients ? > I did

> > You are using Bind9 with flatfiles, this is NOT recommended. > If you are using the standard Ubuntu Bind9 package, you should be using > BIND9_DLZ and this stores the dns info in AD. > How did you provision the DC, was it with 'BIND9_FLATFILE' or > 'BIND9_DLZ' ? > If it was the later, just remove the 'wie' zone and its reverse zone > from the

Hai Guys, Just a general notification. Currently if you run samba 4.x-4.8 and upgraded to 4.9.0-4.9.4 on bind9 dns. Your missing the new folders. So even when your already running on bind9_dlz, follow these steps, and prevent possible problems in future. # create the missing folder. mkdir -p /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns # use samba_upgradedns to move the files and folder and fixes

I am trying to setup samba to use the bind9 backend, but a folder is missing in Samba, according to the WIKI page. This seems to be consistent, as there are several files and folders that are not where they should be, according to the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End That page says there should be a folder at /usr/local/samba/bind-dns, but it's not there. I've

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

Hi, I have updated my DC's to Samba 4.10.7, but I still can't add a new DC to the domain. I believe the problem is with Samba Internal DNS. So I would like to convert my DNS from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ of the production DC's. Then I will join a new DC to the domain to see if it works. I checked the tutorials: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_BIND_DNS_Server

>Was Bind9 installed when you provisioned Samba ? >Why does the first 'named' log line refer to 'dlz_bind9_9.so' ? >Can you post the contents of your named.conf files ? > >Rowland > Hello Rowland root at X200:/etc/bind# cat "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf" # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file

I had configured Samba AD's with Bind9_DLZ in all DC. But for some reason (i couldn't determine) three (sambadc02,03,04) AD's responded very slowly . So change to Samba_Internal backend into the servers with problem and works fine. sambadc01 -> with FSMO roles - Bind9_DLZ sambadc02 -> Samba_Internal sambadc03 -> Samba_Internal sambadc04 -> Samba_Internal My question is:

Hi, I'm folowing the tutorial: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End But, the follows file there isn't in my DC, so can I to create it manually? /usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf file and uncomment the module for your BIND version. For example: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen

Hi all, We've recently migrated from a separate DNS server that was dynamically updated with BIND's update-policy, using a manually generated tkey-gssapi-keytab (plus a second server functioning as an ordinary slave to the first), to BIND9_DLZ. The setup predated Samba's AD DC support and BIND's DLZ support, and was originally established because even though we needed AD, we were

Hello Rowland, See below as requested. /etc/named.conf # Global Configuration Options include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; options { dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; auth-nxdomain yes; directory

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

Alright, I'm taking the plunge: We're switching our three AD DCs from Samba internal to BIND_DLZ back end. I needed a version of BIND with DLZ, as it appears support for that is not so ubiquitous. I went here first: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_BIND_DLZ_backend_with_secured_/_signed_DNS_updates We use Ubuntu 14.04 here, and the Debian/Ubuntu instructions fail on apt-get

Marcio, Just so you know what was wrong. > listen-on port 53 { 192.168.1.20; 127.0.01; }; The Bin9 "not starting problem " wrong was.. 127.0.01 should be ... Ah you know.. Your missing a "dot".. But good you made it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marcio Demetrio

To regenerate dns.keytab I expect you only need to relaunch samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ. If I'm wrong (it happens quiet often) you would have to first launch: samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL and then samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Here you should have a dns.keytab. Now, right issues: dns related files in samba/private must be accessible to the UNIX user

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

I've been working on this problem for a few hours. Here are some updates: Many of the domains I listed are duplicates of domains managed by other DNS servers on my network. There was no point in having them in Samba AD, so I deleted the zones in Windows DNS Manager and created slaves in my named.conf.local folder, so that they'd pull the records from my authoritative BIND DNS server,

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and