similar to: samba4 second dc:s sysvol rights

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "samba4 second dc:s sysvol rights"

2018 Apr 03
2
Unable to rejoin domain, LDAP error 50
I'm sorry, you're absolutely right. I'm not sure why I didn't follow your hint. My fault. Now, it seems I have exactly the same output as you: [root at dc private]# net rpc rights list accounts -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: BUILTIN\Print Operators SeLoadDriverPrivilege SeShutdownPrivilege SeInteractiveLogonRight BUILTIN\Account Operators
2024 Oct 07
1
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
Dear Samba-experts, I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of our samba 4.18.2 AD. printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1 SERV00 -c enumdrivers [Windows x64] Printer Driver Info 1: Driver Name: [Kyocera TASKalfa 5052ci NAEV] CUPS-printers have been installed
2018 Apr 03
0
Unable to rejoin domain, LDAP error 50
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:13:58 +0200 Krzysztof Paszkowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I've cleared all DNS records (indeed, they were still there). > I'm not sure if that was the issue, cause I've discovered that the > real problem is related to insufficient Administrator rights. Funny, if I had thought of that, I would have written something like: At
2016 Sep 08
0
samba Printer Privilege (cannot add or remove anything with regards to Printers at regedit)
we have logged in as administrator opened regedit Connect Network Registry we couldnt add or remove anything to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Cu rrentControlSet\Control\Print\Printers" could you please help us to find what is missing? # net rpc rights list accounts -Uadministrator Enter administrator's password: BUILTIN\Print Operators SeLoadDriverPrivilege SeShutdownPrivilege
2024 Oct 08
1
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:46:36 +0200 Peter Koch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba-experts, > > I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our > samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of > our samba 4.18.2 AD. > > printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: > > root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1
2024 Oct 08
2
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
Hi Rowland, Thanks very much for your quick response. > Have you tried the command with a member of Domain Admins instead of > Administrator ? I just did and I now feel that something is wrong with our Administrator-account. Granting the SePrintOperatorPrivilege to user NAV\prtadmin with user NAV\Administator failes on our fileserver (INVALID PASSWORD). Granting the
2024 Mar 25
1
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID error
Hello everyone, I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second system which should work as file share (filesrv01). I was setting it up using this manual: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs Somehow, I broke the administrator's account. After I set up a test share, I got RPC server unavailable errors. I started investigating and
2016 Oct 27
0
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
I just found this in a log. It is the smbd log, to be exact. [2016/10/27 16:54:11.689360, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:107(security_token_to_unix_token) Unable to convert SID (S-1-5-11) at index 9 in user token to a GID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2016/10/27 16:54:11.689734, 0] ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) Security token SIDs (13):
2016 May 11
0
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID in a SDC
Hi More info: The log.smbd shows the following lines when tryied to login as Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2016/05/11 08:09:36.411968, 2] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2686(lp_do_section) Processing section "[netlogon]" [2016/05/11 08:09:36.412108, 2]
2009 Oct 09
0
Samba assignment of privileges
Even though Samba doesn't use all of the NT privileges, does it allow assigning them to domain users or groups? I.e. this list: |Group Policy Name |Constant Name | |Access this computer from the network |SeNetworkLogonRight | |Access Credential Manager as a trusted |SeTrustedCredManAccessPrivilege | |caller
2018 Apr 03
0
Unable to rejoin domain, LDAP error 50
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:36:35 +0200 Krzysztof Paszkowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm sorry, you're absolutely right. I'm not sure why I didn't follow > your hint. My fault. > > Now, it seems I have exactly the same output as you: > > [root at dc private]# net rpc rights list accounts -U Administrator > > BUILTIN\Administrators
2016 Jul 02
0
getfacl not have domain name and samba4 not work correctly
Tks for help me. I change /etc/hosts! Others details: *[root at smb~]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf* passwd: files sss winbind shadow: files sss winbind group: files sss winbind hosts: files dns myhostname bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files ethers: files netmasks: files networks: files protocols: files rpc: files services: files sss netgroup: files sss
2024 Mar 25
1
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID error
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:39:21 +0100 Kai via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second > system which should work as file share (filesrv01). > I was setting it up using this manual: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > > Somehow, I broke
2024 Mar 25
1
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID error
Am 25.03.24 um 10:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:39:21 +0100 > Kai via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second >> system which should work as file share (filesrv01). >> I was setting it up using this manual: >>
2016 Oct 07
0
The security id structure is invalid
On 10/7/16 3:30 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > idmap.ldb is very easy to repair, just open it in ldbedit, find the sid > and delete the entire object, close and save. > > If the user/group does exist in sam.ldb, it will be recreated in > idmap.ldb, but with a different ID number. > Ok, I fixed the issue with the SID ending in 1111, but this one remains (and the
2016 Jul 04
3
getfacl not have domain name and samba4 not work correctly
sorry , the original message was in error. Follow: Hi. Sorry. Today I have a big problem with the samba I can not solve! My permissions do not work properly. in the RSAT created groups, OU and users. I configured in Windows the shared directory *TECNOLOGIA* security settings assigning full permissions to *grupo_tecnologia* (technology group). However users who are with *grupo_tecnologia*
2015 Jan 17
0
Administrators SID is invalid.
On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a >>>>>>>>>>>> month >>>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator".
2008 Oct 19
1
samba4/Win2008: error -> directory property cannot be found in the cache
I setup a samba4 pdc and successfully added a Windows 2008 machine to the domain. When I start up the "Active Directory Users and Computers" tool, I get a "Naming information cannot be located because: directory property cannot be found in the cache" error. I'm running a pretty up to date version of samba4. The head commit is: commit
2018 Apr 03
2
Unable to rejoin domain, LDAP error 50
There was lack of membership in Administrators domain/Builtin group. I had only: Domain Users Group Policy Creator Owners Enterprise Admins Schema Admins Domain Admins I've added and I'll try. Thank you. Any hint with the recreation of keytab file? Regards, Kris -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny via samba Sent:
2015 Jan 18
0
Administrators SID is invalid.
On 18/01/15 18:10, Carlo wrote: > Il 17/01/15 17:10, Rowland Penny ha scritto: >> On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a month >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. It