similar to: remove IP from DNS ldb

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "remove IP from DNS ldb"

2012 Oct 17
9
access my created share in smb.conf Only by Ip
Hello samba4 rc3 *s4-ad -> samba server Host name test.s4.com -> domain name* *Dns Server -> Samba Internal DNS server , Bind 9.9.1-P2* *win xp* have access to default share such as sysvol by dns name (\\test.s4.com \sysvol) but if created a share in smb.conf Only access by IP such as : \\test.s4.com\myshare -> no access and ask me for user and password !
2015 Jan 04
2
Bug found in Samba 4 ?
Le 31.12.2014 17:19, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but
2013 Jan 31
2
Samba4 Internal DNS - CNAME not working
Hello, It seems Samba4 is having problems with CNAME records. I am seeing the same behavior as mentioned in the thread below. Is there any ETA on a fix for this? This is identical to the problem with MX records. This is currently a much bigger problem than the MX records. I appreciate any assistance. [root at DC1 var]# dig autodiscover.testdom.com CNAME ; <<>> DiG
2014 Dec 31
2
Bug found in Samba 4 ?
Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: > > * I am using Samba 4.1.11. > * server role = classic primary domain controller > * domain logons = yes > * domain
2013 Apr 10
1
samba_dnsupdate?
Now for the next question. I think (hope?) that I am quite close now. In order to add a machine to the domain, I think that I need to add a record to samba's DNS table. But samba_dnsupdate isn't working: # samba_dnsupdate -d 5 INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5 passdb: 5
2014 Dec 19
1
smbstatus issue in v4.1
Sorry I should have said in my original post, this server is a NT4 style domain server. Looking in /var/log/samba I see log files with the machine names in the file names, so samba definitely knows the machine names. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ricky Nance <ricky.nance at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) >
2014 Dec 27
2
Bug found in Samba 4 ?
Dear Ricky, Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: * I am using Samba 4.1.11. * server role = classic primary domain controller * domain logons = yes * domain master = yes * When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : * logon script = employee.bat * But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even
2013 Aug 16
2
share permissions
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares [mytest] path = /home/me/mytestshare <-- with or without trailing slash read only = No On the W2K3 box, I can browse to \\newdc and I see my test share listed there. I can also see
2013 May 30
1
Samba 4 and Profile directory issues.
Hi, On 5/30/2013 8:17 AM, Ricky Nance wrote: > Are you logged in as DOMAIN\Administrator to the windows machine? My own dumb mistakes, I created a remote desktop connection to that server and hadn't noticed I as logged in as a non admin user. Now home directories are created as it should and profile directories are too, but with the .V2 extension. I stheis the expected behavior?, I
2014 Dec 17
2
smbstatus issue in v4.1
In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID
2014 Dec 26
4
Bug found in Samba 4 ?
Dear all, As nobody seems to know what the problem could be, I think it must be an important bug in Samba 4 that "forget" to replace %G or %g with the group name. Could someone confirm that it is a bug and that I should fill one, in samba bugzilla ? Thank you very much, Denis -------- Message original -------- OBJET: Re: [Samba] Samba "%G" replacement not
2014 Dec 21
2
Samba "%G" replacement not working in "Logon script" ?
Dear Ricky, Thanks a lot for your answer. But I still have two problems: 1. I am not using samba as AD DC but as PDC. 2. What I would need is the primary group... Do you thinks %WORKGROUP% could work ? 3. And should I use %WORKGROUP% in smb.conf or in batch login script... Thanks a lot in advance for your help... Denis Le 18.12.2014 21:58, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > Dennis, if you
2014 Dec 15
2
samba slowing down
The longer our samba runs the more delayed the responses become. Samba has been running for 5 months but this new development was noticed 2 weeks ago. The first major sign of the issue was a new DC was trying to join and failed due to timeout errors. At close look we see performance degradation within a few hours or when we try to join a new DC. smb.conf # Global parameters [global]
2011 Nov 21
1
quota.h
Hi configure samba4 with --with-sys-quotas and check bin/config.log see this message: ------------------------------------------ Checking for header sys/fs/vx/quota.h ==> #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stddef.h> #include <memory.h> #include <string.h> #include <strings.h> #include
2011 Dec 14
1
how to set up bind9 dns server for joined samba 4 to server 2003
Hi Samba4 joined to server 2003 as a DC with this command: samba-tool domain join samba.example.com DC -Uadministrator --realm=samba.example.com *How to Setup bind 9.7.3 as dns server Instead of windows dns server?* ================================> try this: create dns and named files with provision command copy dns and named files to joind samba config bind and set
2015 Jan 27
2
Installing Samba 3
On Tuesday 27 January 2015 16:30:18 Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:14:20PM +0000, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Still trying to get security = share working, which it appears means I > > need to install Samba 3. As the server is pretty much goverened by this, > > I can > > You don't need Samba3.x, 4.x is no different in
2013 Feb 20
1
getent group return only local users
Hello I use S4 file server with nsswitch.conf (ad server is another Linux with S4) : passwd: compat winbind group: compat winbind I wonder how it can be possible that : * getent passwd is ok * but getent group returns only local users (wbinfo -g is ok and gives domain user) Any idea ? Regards -- Herv? H?noch Responsable informatique Institut Sainte
2014 Dec 18
4
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
On 18/12/14 16:19, Germ van Eck wrote: > Not sure about the high CPU load, but you have the [netlogon] share > twice in your smb.conf. Your first matches mine, have you added the > second yourself? > The second one looks weird with 2 path definitions. > Cj Tibbetts schreef op do 18-12-2014 om 08:59 [-0700]: >> New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting
2014 Dec 16
2
Samba "%G" replacement not working in "Logon script" ?
Dear all, I experience now a strange bug with Samba 4.1.11 : When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : logon script = employee.bat But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even "%G.bat", it doesn't work : * logon script = %g.bat * logon script = %G.bat * logon script = "%G.bat" In the logs, there was a message showing that Samba was
2012 Sep 02
1
Cross Compile Samba4
Hi, I try to port samba4beta8 to Optware which includes cross compiling it for various platforms. I already created makefiles for optware for samba versions 3.4 and 3.6. Creating a working makefile for samba4 I try to use the new build environment but it puzzles me. I don't get over part where the python version is being checked. From my findings it looks like the linker dislikes the