similar to: Fw: Connection fails with Server/Client Signing = Mandatory

Hello, When I add "server signing = mandatory" to my smb.conf file (AIX V6.1, 6100-04-11-1140 running Samba v3.6.5) that has "encrypt passwords = no", my windows client no longer can connect. It fails with system error 64. The windows system is running XP vers 2002 with service pack 3. The security settings are set to: Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications

Hi Everyone. I have run across an issue that is driving me crazy. This is a new deployment of Samba v3.6.5 with openldap v2.4.30 and smbldap-tools v0.9.8 When trying to join the domain, on the first attempt the machine account is properly created in the correct ou - e.g. ou=Computers,dc=domain,dc=local But the "failed to join domain" pop-up with reason of "The user name could

Hello Samba-Specialists, which smb.conf-options do I have to set to get access to a Samba-Share from a Windows7-Machine, if the Windows7-Machine is very restrictive configured regarding 'smb-signing'? Windows7-Configuration: Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (if server agrees): Enabled Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always): Enabled

Hello, I'm experiencing very slow read/write performance, about 20 MB/s, on Samba share when I configure the "server signing" option as "mandatory". Once I set "server signing" to "default", the read/write performance returns to average speed about 800 MB/s. I am using Samba 4.9.4 on server with Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (32 threads) and 10 Gbit

Hi! I'm trying to connect to a share on a Windows 2003 server with samba 3.0.0. I have edited smb.conf as was instructed in chapter 7 of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection to include the following: client use spnego = yes When I try to connect to the server, I get the following error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it 2355: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection

Hi, I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command replied: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 9451: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed No I'd suggest to change the message at least: It's unclear who "we" is: The Samba Team, the client, or the server The server is a "Windows 2003 server",

Ok thank you. So, Is my file server with Samba 4.17.12 vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114 if it is not a DC server? To be clear, I don't use any Active Directory domain controller in my network. Best regards. Adam Blaszczykowski pon., 23 pa? 2023 o 10:20 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisa?(a): > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:54:47 +0200 > Adam B?aszczykowski via samba

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:02:20 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok thank you. > So, Is my file server with Samba 4.17.12 vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114 > if it is not a DC server? > > To be clear, I don't use any Active Directory domain controller in my > network. Lets see if I can paraphrase the documentation for CVE-2016-2014

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:13:49 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I'm experiencing very slow read/write performance, about 20 MB/s, on > Samba share when I configure the "server signing" option as > "mandatory". Once I set "server signing" to "default", the read/write > performance returns

Hi, If I update the Samba server version to the latest one, set the "server signing = default" parameter and the "server role = standalone" parameter, will my server be vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114? Thank you. pon., 16 pa? 2023 o 16:50 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisa?(a): > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:13:49 +0200 > Adam B?aszczykowski via

I have encountered this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 26595: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed when I am attempting to mount a windows xp machine from a linux machine: mount -t smbfs //machine/share /root/smb_mnt -o username=administrator,password=mypass I have looked through the archives and found the following information concerning this

When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), I can still join a Window 7 machine to the domain but I am no longer able to log on into the domain using a domain user. Is this normal? I am using Samba 3.6.3 on Linux 12.04. Is there anything that needs to be configured on the Windows machine? Thanks, Ali

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:54:47 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I have updated my system to Debian 12 with Samba 4.17.12, but the > problem with performance still exist. > On the Samba page there is a note in the CVE-2016-2114 description: > "Note that the default for server roles other than active directory > domain

Hello, I have updated my system to Debian 12 with Samba 4.17.12, but the problem with performance still exist. On the Samba page there is a note in the CVE-2016-2114 description: "Note that the default for server roles other than active directory domain controller, is "off" because of performance reasons." https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2114.html Does it mean

The point estimates produced by wilcox.test are perverse (not wrong, just brain damaged). The Hodges-Lehmann estimator that goes with the signed rank test is the median of the Walsh averages. The Hodges-Lehmann estimator that goes with the rank sum test is the median of the pairwise differences. wilcox.test agrees except that it uses the following very peculiar definition of "sample

I am trying to get samba working again, since my employer upgraded to a Windows Server 2003. I have installed samba-3.0.2a-1_rh9.i386.rpm to my Linux (RedHat 9) system. I can connect to other machines in my domain, read/write files, etc. When I try smbmount on the Windows server, I get this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. I have tried enabling SMB

Is there a more elegant way to do the following without disabling digital signing? What if I have an app requiring digital signing I need to connect to the W2K3 in the future? For explanation have the following; 1. Linux server running Samba 2.2.8a 2. Linux server running Samba 3.0.10 3. Window 2003 Server Standard SP1, not running Active Directory or as domain controller. 4. Windows XP Pro

While attempting to use cifs to mount a win2k3 share, I get this error: [root@dhcp190 root]# mount //win2k3/data -t cifs -o username=administrator /mnt/smbfs cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 2687: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed Where exactly do I enable smb signing? kernel 2.6.5 + samba 3.0.3

I have not tried with a Samba 4.x DC. As far as I know Samba 4.x does not have this limitation. On 01/06/15 04:10, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > Does this mean that we cannot use mandatory server signing in Samba 3? > What about the later versions? The problem is that lack of server > signing is considered a security hole. > > > Inactive hide

We are using samba on RedHat 8.8. The latest samba version available for RHEL8 is samba 4.17.5 Since samba is updated to 4.17.5 from 4.16.4 the "server signing = mandatory" config option seems to be broken. Nessus scans reports a vulnerability on server signing not required: SMB Signing not required VULNERABILITY MEDIUM PLUGIN ID57608 Description Signing is not required on the remote