similar to: [Announce] Samba 3.6.8 Available for Download

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[Announce] Samba 3.6.8 Available for Download"

2012 Sep 24
1
[Announce] Samba 3.5.18 Available for Download
===================================================================== "When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity. Albert Einstein ===================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the
2012 Sep 24
1
[Announce] Samba 3.5.18 Available for Download
===================================================================== "When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity. Albert Einstein ===================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the
2012 Aug 06
1
[Announce] Samba 3.6.7 Available for Download
=================================================================== "Change is such hard work." Billy Crystal =================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.7 include: o Fix resolving our own "Domain Local" groups
2012 Aug 06
1
[Announce] Samba 3.6.7 Available for Download
=================================================================== "Change is such hard work." Billy Crystal =================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.7 include: o Fix resolving our own "Domain Local" groups
2013 Apr 30
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix typo in send.c
A user reported a bug where we do sizeof(*ptr * count) instead of sizeof(*ptr) * count. Fix this. Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c index ff40f1c..7c8964b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
======================================================== "Tomorrow is often the busiest day of the week." Spanish proverb ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.9 release series. Changes since 4.9.6: -------------------- o Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
======================================================== "Tomorrow is often the busiest day of the week." Spanish proverb ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.9 release series. Changes since 4.9.6: -------------------- o Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall
2013 Oct 07
0
Fwd: RE: [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [Samba] [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:46:04 -0500 From: JUAN EDUARDO DELGADILLO CHAVEZ <juan at idec.edu.mx> To: gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com Re: [Samba] [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326 Did you create the smb user and password? You must create users with smbpasswd ?a username to connect to the share
2014 May 10
1
3.6.8 and 4.1.3 throughput compassion
Hi All, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements.Following is the comparison result samba 3.6.8 + samba4.1.3. Following number is robocopy 2 flow result. 3.6.8 Read/Write (speed MB/sec) : 210/*202* 4.1 Read/Write: (speed MB/sec) : 220/*192* In case of read am getting better throughput for samba 4.1 but write always less. How can i improve the write throughput? Am not
2017 Aug 24
2
dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c: 4 * suspicious expression ?
Hello there, dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c:130]: (style) Suspicious condition (assignment + comparison); Clarify expression with parentheses. Source code is if ((ret = doveadm_print_istream(input) < 0)) Maybe better code if ((ret = doveadm_print_istream(input)) < 0) Some duplicates: [dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c:220]: (style) Suspicious
2019 Apr 03
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.1 Available for Download
======================================================== "The past cannot be changed. The future is yet in your power." Unknown ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series. Changes since 4.10.0: --------------------- o Douglas Bagnall
2019 Apr 03
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.1 Available for Download
======================================================== "The past cannot be changed. The future is yet in your power." Unknown ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series. Changes since 4.10.0: --------------------- o Douglas Bagnall
2015 Apr 10
1
Username issue with Samba 3.6.8
Hello, I am currently running into a very weird issue and I was wondering if anyone else has seen this before. Samba 3.6.8 running on a Solaris 10u5 server. The SAMBA share is accessed through Windows 7 clients. A username with the word "power" can't connect. It gives an error of "Invalid username and or bad password" We modify the user account with different variations
2017 Oct 11
1
dovecot-2.2.33 bug report
Hello there, dovecot-2.2.33/src/lib/str-find.c:86]: (warning) Calling 'sizeof' on 'sizeof' Source code is ctx = p_malloc(pool, MALLOC_ADD(sizeof(struct str_find_context), MALLOC_MULTIPLY(sizeof(ctx->goodtab[0]), key_len))); Regards David Binderman
2010 Jan 19
1
static analysis tool cppcheck meets the btrfs code - four issues
Hello there, I just ran the sourceforge tool cppcheck over the source code of the new Linux kernel 2.6.32.4 It said 1. [./btrfs/free-space-cache.c:600]: (style) Redundant condition. It is safe to deallocate a NULL pointer The source code is                 if (info->bitmap)                         kfree(info->bitmap); I agree with cppcheck. Suggest delete the if test. 2.
2013 Oct 08
1
nut-2.6.5:rhino.c:190: bad if test ?
Hello there, Offending source code is ????? if(? ( BattVoltage> 129 ) || ( BattVoltage < 144 ) ) Maybe swap || for && would be better. This problem I found by using cppcheck. It said [rhino.c:190]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: BattVoltage> 129 || BattVoltage < 144. Regards David Binderman
2013 Jun 28
1
version 2.3.3, file log.c bug report
Hello there, I just ran the static analysis checker "cppcheck" over the source code of icecast version 2.3.3 Amongst many other things, it said [log.c:301]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: log_id < 0 && log_id>= 25. Source code is ??? if (log_id < 0 && log_id>= LOG_MAXLOGS) ??????? return; Suggest replace && with ||.
2017 May 02
0
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:: possible unintended fallthrough ?
Hello there, drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Source code is switch (dmaobj->base.access) { case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00004000; break; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_WO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00008000; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RW: dmaobj->flags2
2017 Sep 04
0
linux-4.13/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/fan.c:86: possible faulty logic ?
Hello there, [linux-4.13/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/fan.c:93]: (warning) Opposite inner 'if' condition leads to a dead code block. Source code is if (target != duty) { u16 bump_period = fan->bios.bump_period; u16 slow_down_period = fan->bios.slow_down_period; u64 delay; if (duty > target) delay = slow_down_period;
2019 Aug 05
0
linux-5.3-rc3 bug report
Hello there, linux-5.3-rc3/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c:763]: (style) Array index 'i' is used before limits check. Source code is for (i = 0; buffer->fault[i] && i < buffer->entries; i++) Maybe better code: for (i = 0; (i < buffer->entries) && buffer->fault[i]; i++) Regards David Binderman