Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[Announce] Samba 3.6.8 Available for Download"
2012 Sep 24
1
[Announce] Samba 3.5.18 Available for Download
=====================================================================
"When you are courting a nice girl an
hour seems like a second. When you
sit on a red-hot cinder a second
seems like an hour.
That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
=====================================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the
2012 Sep 24
1
[Announce] Samba 3.5.18 Available for Download
=====================================================================
"When you are courting a nice girl an
hour seems like a second. When you
sit on a red-hot cinder a second
seems like an hour.
That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
=====================================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the
2012 Aug 06
1
[Announce] Samba 3.6.7 Available for Download
===================================================================
"Change is such hard work."
Billy Crystal
===================================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6.
Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.7 include:
o Fix resolving our own "Domain Local" groups
2012 Aug 06
1
[Announce] Samba 3.6.7 Available for Download
===================================================================
"Change is such hard work."
Billy Crystal
===================================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6.
Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.7 include:
o Fix resolving our own "Domain Local" groups
2013 Apr 30
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix typo in send.c
A user reported a bug where we do sizeof(*ptr * count) instead of sizeof(*ptr) *
count. Fix this.
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index ff40f1c..7c8964b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
========================================================
"Tomorrow is often the busiest
day of the week."
Spanish proverb
========================================================
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.9 release series.
Changes since 4.9.6:
--------------------
o Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
========================================================
"Tomorrow is often the busiest
day of the week."
Spanish proverb
========================================================
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.9 release series.
Changes since 4.9.6:
--------------------
o Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall
2013 Oct 07
0
Fwd: RE: [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Samba] [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:46:04 -0500
From: JUAN EDUARDO DELGADILLO CHAVEZ <juan at idec.edu.mx>
To: gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com
Re: [Samba] [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326
Did you create the smb user and password?
You must create users with smbpasswd ?a username to connect to the share
2014 May 10
1
3.6.8 and 4.1.3 throughput compassion
Hi All,
My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements.Following is
the comparison result samba 3.6.8 + samba4.1.3.
Following number is robocopy 2 flow result.
3.6.8
Read/Write (speed MB/sec) : 210/*202*
4.1
Read/Write: (speed MB/sec) : 220/*192*
In case of read am getting better throughput for samba 4.1 but write always
less.
How can i improve the write throughput?
Am not
2017 Aug 24
2
dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c: 4 * suspicious expression ?
Hello there,
dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c:130]: (style) Suspicious condition (assignment + comparison); Clarify expression with parentheses.
Source code is
if ((ret = doveadm_print_istream(input) < 0))
Maybe better code
if ((ret = doveadm_print_istream(input)) < 0)
Some duplicates:
[dovecot-2.2.32/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-fetch.c:220]: (style) Suspicious
2019 Apr 03
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.1 Available for Download
========================================================
"The past cannot be changed.
The future is yet in your
power."
Unknown
========================================================
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series.
Changes since 4.10.0:
---------------------
o Douglas Bagnall
2019 Apr 03
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.1 Available for Download
========================================================
"The past cannot be changed.
The future is yet in your
power."
Unknown
========================================================
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series.
Changes since 4.10.0:
---------------------
o Douglas Bagnall
2015 Apr 10
1
Username issue with Samba 3.6.8
Hello,
I am currently running into a very weird issue and I was wondering if anyone else has seen this before.
Samba 3.6.8 running on a Solaris 10u5 server.
The SAMBA share is accessed through Windows 7 clients.
A username with the word "power" can't connect. It gives an error of "Invalid username and or bad password"
We modify the user account with different variations
2017 Oct 11
1
dovecot-2.2.33 bug report
Hello there,
dovecot-2.2.33/src/lib/str-find.c:86]: (warning) Calling 'sizeof' on 'sizeof'
Source code is
ctx = p_malloc(pool, MALLOC_ADD(sizeof(struct str_find_context),
MALLOC_MULTIPLY(sizeof(ctx->goodtab[0]), key_len)));
Regards
David Binderman
2010 Jan 19
1
static analysis tool cppcheck meets the btrfs code - four issues
Hello there,
I just ran the sourceforge tool cppcheck over the source code of the
new Linux kernel 2.6.32.4
It said
1.
[./btrfs/free-space-cache.c:600]: (style) Redundant condition. It is safe to deallocate a NULL pointer
The source code is
if (info->bitmap)
kfree(info->bitmap);
I agree with cppcheck. Suggest delete the if test.
2.
2013 Oct 08
1
nut-2.6.5:rhino.c:190: bad if test ?
Hello there,
Offending source code is
????? if(? ( BattVoltage> 129 ) || ( BattVoltage < 144 ) )
Maybe swap || for && would be better.
This problem I found by using cppcheck. It said
[rhino.c:190]: (warning) Logical disjunction always evaluates to true: BattVoltage> 129 || BattVoltage < 144.
Regards
David Binderman
2013 Jun 28
1
version 2.3.3, file log.c bug report
Hello there,
I just ran the static analysis checker "cppcheck" over the source code
of icecast version 2.3.3
Amongst many other things, it said
[log.c:301]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: log_id < 0 && log_id>= 25.
Source code is
??? if (log_id < 0 && log_id>= LOG_MAXLOGS)
??????? return;
Suggest replace && with ||.
2017 May 02
0
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:: possible unintended fallthrough ?
Hello there,
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Source code is
switch (dmaobj->base.access) {
case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO:
dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00004000;
break;
case NV_MEM_ACCESS_WO:
dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00008000;
case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RW:
dmaobj->flags2
2017 Sep 04
0
linux-4.13/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/fan.c:86: possible faulty logic ?
Hello there,
[linux-4.13/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/fan.c:93]: (warning) Opposite inner 'if' condition leads to a dead code block.
Source code is
if (target != duty) {
u16 bump_period = fan->bios.bump_period;
u16 slow_down_period = fan->bios.slow_down_period;
u64 delay;
if (duty > target)
delay = slow_down_period;
2019 Aug 05
0
linux-5.3-rc3 bug report
Hello there,
linux-5.3-rc3/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c:763]: (style) Array index 'i' is used before limits check.
Source code is
for (i = 0; buffer->fault[i] && i < buffer->entries; i++)
Maybe better code:
for (i = 0; (i < buffer->entries) && buffer->fault[i]; i++)
Regards
David Binderman