similar to: cpuset not affecting real pid placement

2014-08-26 19:11 GMT+04:00 Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>: > not, right now it is not possible. Why don`t you want to just assign > unique paths for socket name, derived, say, from VM` UUID? > In case of unix domain sockets paths not problem, but i want to connect to each qemu-ga address from central point. I don't want to use socat , as i see qemu have ability to specify

Hi, There is a quite annoying thing, don`t sure if I can call it a bug. How to reproduce: - start a bunch of VMs, - stop libvirt, - start libvirt and immediately issue any call, say, 'virsh version', - delay until call completion may be fitted nearly as quadratic function from number of running VMs, qemu-kvm in my case (see link below). After this delay passed, any calls executed

Hello. Is that possible to create virtio-serial port that on host listens tcp socket and how to avoid duplicate listened ports in case of migration? -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tolstov@selfip.ru jabber: vase@selfip.ru

Hi, Since this message(https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-October/msg00054.html) qemu folks have released one minor version in the 1.2 branch and shiny new 1.3 some days ago and the problem still persists. At first I has blamed libvirt, but I was not correct at all - since I have released package ``slices'' for myself including both newer libvirth and qemu, I wasn`t able

Small update: traceFlag T8038 => no improvement... -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Dominique Ramaekers Verzonden: vrijdag 13 maart 2015 16:35 Aan: 'Daniel P. Berrange'; Andrey Korolyov CC: libvirt-users@redhat.com Onderwerp: RE: [libvirt-users] Processor usage of qemu process. Results ---------- First I want to show my appreciation to Daniel and Andrey. So thanks... I've

Dear all I allocate only one vcpu for the container by the following statement, that is, I want to pin the vcpu to physical core "2". <vcpu placement='static' cpuset="2" >1</vcpu> My host has 4 physical cores. Before test, all the 4 cores are idle. After I run 4 processes in the container, I found all the 4 cores in the host are 100% used. That is, the

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Dominique Ramaekers wrote: >> Dear Daniel, my XML's: >> >> Note: It seems I was to quick, the Windows 8.1 isn't fixed... >> >> Windows Server 2015 R2 >> >> <domain type='kvm' id='146'> >>

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > 2.0 model works fine > > 2.1 crashes with following: > > /tmp/buildd/qemu-2.0.92+rev1/hw/i386/smbios.c:825: smbios_get_tables: > Assertion `smbios_smp_sockets >= 1' failed > > Not sure if bisect will help much, but the commit which introduced > this platform works

Hello, According to the docs, vcpupin will use either cgroups or sched_setaffinity to pin vcpu threads to cpus. How is this decision made? I observe differences even on different hosts featuring the same version of libvirtd (1.3.1): on one host vcpupin affects cpuset.cpus (cgroup), and on the other it affects vcpu threads affinity (observed through taskset). Thanks, Nikos -------------- next

Hi, I'm making a multipanel lattice densityplot figure with 2 factors (3 and 20 classes in each factor) with the following statement (the type="percent" is there to prevent plotting the actual points which detract from the figure - is there another way of doing this?): densityplot(~End-Begin | Type * Chromosome, data=Mon, layout=c(5,12), xlab="Element

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:21:08AM +0300, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 02:35:02AM +0300, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andrey Korolyov

Hi all, I have been trying to run a VM on some particular cpu cores. Now the thing is I can set cpuset with virt-install and that will reflect in VM's XML and it will define the affinity. But what about cpuset.cpus? That is inherited directly from the parent. Is there any way to set it when launching the VM? Again, if I have given cpuset during virt-install, why doesn't cpuset.cpus

Is it possible to use virsh to set the cpuset attribute of the CPU Allocation element in a domain ? <domain> ... <vcpu placement='static' cpuset="1-4,^3,6" current="1">2</vcpu> ... </domain> I have seen that virsh vcpupin and virsh emulatorpin can be used to query and set the cpusets of the <vcpupin> and <emulatorpin>

Hello All, Since 4.5.0-23.el7 version (Red Hat 7.7), when I launch pinned VM, libvirtd reset CPU affinity to all enabled in host CPUs, if it runs in custom cpuset. I can't reproduce this behavior with 4.5.0-10.el7_6.12 with the same kernel version (Red Hat 7.7). Libvirt runs in a custom cpuset 'libvirt', where the number of available cpus is restricted to 0,2,4,6,8. And this

Hi all, I have been trying to use cpuset with virt-install. I am using the following command: $ virt-install --virt-type kvm --name Ubuntu13 --ram 1024 --cdrom=/home/peeyush/Downloads/ubuntu-13.04-desktop-i386.iso --cpuset=0,2 --disk path=/var/lib/libvirt/guest.qcow2,size=10,format=qcow2 Now, according to virt-install man page, my VM's cpu affinity should be set to pcpu 0 and 2 . But when

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:29:49PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I think it would be useful if libvirt will be able to prefix all >> messages from emulator pipes with the date stamping, for example I am >> trying to catch very rare and non-fatal race with

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:49:23AM +0000, WANG Cheng D wrote: > Dear all > > I allocate only one vcpu for the container by the following > statement, that is, I want to pin the vcpu to physical core "2". > <vcpu placement='static' cpuset="2" >1</vcpu> > My host has 4 physical cores. Before test, all the 4 cores are > idle. After I run 4

On 09/14/2018 03:36 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue > with iozone remains the same. > > The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. > > The corrected XML looks like follows: [Reformated XML for better reading] <cpu mode="host-passthrough">

Hello again, when the iozone writes slow. This is how slabtop looks like: 62476752 62476728 0% 0.10K 1601968 39 6407872K buffer_head 1000678 999168 0% 0.56K 142954 7 571816K radix_tree_node 132184 125911 0% 0.03K 1066 124 4264K kmalloc-32 118496 118224 0% 0.12K 3703 32 14812K kmalloc-node 73206 56467 0% 0.19K 3486 21

On 09/17/2018 04:59 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > so the current domain configuration: > <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11'