Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Difference between Indexing and Rescan in FTS"
2010 Feb 25
1
FTS cron script to force index updates
From: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
"You could also build a cronjob to index users' mailboxes once in a while
(by selecting each mailbox and issuing a SEARCH TEXT xyzzyx command)."
Has anyone written a script to perform the above? If not, how would I do
this? Would I write a shell script to telnet to the IMAP port and then
issue the commands? Can this be done with a bash
2008 Jun 20
1
ForceCommand internal-sftp causes sftp logging to fail (openssh-5.0p1)
Hi guys,
I have a server setup with openssh-5.0p1 and use some users as
sftp-only chroot accounts.
The following configuration yields exactly the result I want:
user is chrooted, logs to syslog, all is good.
#================================================#
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -f AUTHPRIV -l VERBOSE
Match User fredwww
ChrootDirectory %h
#ForceCommand internal-sftp
2019 Feb 08
2
Fwd: [grosjo/fts-xapian] `doveadm fts rescan` removes all indices (#15)
Hi,
THis is a core problem in Dovecot in my understanding.
In my opinion, the rescan in dovecot should send to the FTS plugin the
list of "supposedly" indexed emails (UID), and the plugin shall purge
the redundant UID (i..e UID present in the index but not in the list
sent by dovecot) and send back the list of UID not in its indexes to
dovecot, so Dovect can send one by one the
2019 Feb 17
2
[grosjo/fts-xapian] `doveadm fts rescan` removes all indices (#15)
In such case, as long as the API is not upgraded, should
doveadm index -A -q \*
be considered a replacement of
doveadm fts rescan
On 2019-02-14 16:24, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The rescan() function is a bit badly designed. Currently what you could do what fts-lucene does and:
> - Get list of UIDs for all mails in each folder
> - If Xapian has UID that
2015 Oct 13
1
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hi Christian,
may be the issue is related to this other post:
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-September/102094.html
Anyway, what I can tell you is that for every? user account,? for every
folders created after the last doveadm fts rescan for that user, dovecot
does not invoke indexer.
A new rescan fix the problem for all the folders created up to that moment.
I was wondering if I was
2015 Oct 12
2
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hello,
on my debian wheezy installation, I implemented fts plugin with solr as
indexing system.
I noticed that if a user creates a new folder, that folder it is ignored by
dovecot indexing until a doveadm fts rescan is performed for that user.
From that time on everything works ok on that folder.
As a test I set fts_autoindex=yes and put in that folder a brand new mail
never indexed before. in
2019 Feb 17
0
[grosjo/fts-xapian] `doveadm fts rescan` removes all indices (#15)
Not really, as the steps outlined by Timo would not get done.
Aki
> On 17 February 2019 at 10:56 Joan Moreau via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>
> In such case, as long as the API is not upgraded, should
>
> doveadm index -A -q \*
>
> be considered a replacement of
>
> doveadm fts rescan
>
> On 2019-02-14 16:24, Timo Sirainen via
2015 Oct 13
0
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hi,
On 2015-10-12 18:39, Giorgio Paolucci wrote:
> Hello,
> on my debian wheezy installation, I implemented fts plugin with solr as
> indexing system.
> I noticed that if a user creates a new folder, that folder it is
> ignored by
> dovecot indexing until a doveadm fts rescan is performed for that user.
> From that time on everything works ok on that folder.
>
> As a
1999 Jul 19
1
Saving MS Word Documents to a Samba Share from NT
I have installed Samba 2.0.4a on SGIs running IRIX 6.5. My PC is running NT
Workstation SP 3. I have a problem saving documents from MS Word 97 SP 1.
If I create a new document and attempt to save it to a Samba share I get the
following error message: Word cannot complete the save due to a file
permission error. (G:\XX\TEST.DOC). A listing of the directory from Unix
shows the following:
2011 May 22
2
fts crash
I've completed my mailbox rebuild - theoretically I should be free of
corruption. I used dsync to export from mdbox to maildir (so should be
clean) then used a virtual machine with Dovecot to import back to mdbox
in another location. So...theoretically I should be free of all
corruption now...
Running an fts update - "doveadm search text -u user at domain.com xyzzyx"
works on
2020 Sep 08
2
[PATCH] Rescan the entire target on transport reset when LUN is 0
On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote:
> VirtIO 1.0 spec says
> The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY
> apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator
> to rescan the target to detect this.
>
> This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the
> entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a
2020 Sep 08
2
[PATCH] Rescan the entire target on transport reset when LUN is 0
On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote:
> VirtIO 1.0 spec says
> The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY
> apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator
> to rescan the target to detect this.
>
> This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the
> entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a
2005 Nov 09
2
Rescan harddisk size without rebooting
Hi list,
I have a SAN attached to a CentOS 4.2 server. I have expanded the size
of the virtual disk within the SAN (by adding a new HD to the disk pool)
and need CentOS to see the new size (CentOS see it as /dev/sdb). I'm
using LVM. Do you know a method for the Volume Group to see that one of
its harddisk is now bigger, without rebooting (it's not a problem with a
reboot but since
2008 Dec 03
1
how to rescan serial ports without reboot
Hi all,
I hope this is possible. I have a server, with a network switch
attached to the serial port, and I want to rescan the serial port
(/dev/tty) to see if it picks it up? I'd prefer not to reboot the
server if at all possible.
dmesg reports ttyS0 as the active port:
[root at zabackup01 ~]# dmesg |grep tty
Bootdata ok (command line is ro root=/dev/System/root rhgb quiet xencons=tty6)
2009 Sep 22
2
rescan usb hd
I have a usb hd that I use for backup. Occasionally it dies.
scsi 6:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 6:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 6:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 6:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 0
lost page write due to I/O error on sdc1
EXT2-fs error (device sdc1): read_inode_bitmap: Cannot read inode
bitmap -
2007 Dec 14
3
Qlogic HBA scanning issues with CentOS 5.1 ?
Hi,
I got few servers (IBM HS20,HS21 blades, IBM xSeries 3650 & others)
connected to a dual fabric san throught Qlogic HBA's (23xx, 24xx).
Multipathing is done with device-mapper-multipath.
On CentOS 4.x i can scan for new scsi devices without any problems, get
them up with multipathing & use them without any problems.
However, after i started installing CentOS 5.1 (did not
2014 Jul 14
2
doveadm-server does NOT know fts commands
Hi,
I'm using Dovecot 2.2.13 with Dovecot Director, Doveadm server and FTS.
I want to run doveadm on Director hosts, but Dovecot server on
backend hosts reject "fts *" commands.
On Dovecot Director hosts:
# doveadm fts optimize -u u0001 at example.jp
# echo $?
75
# doveadm fts rescan -u u0001 at example.jp
# echo $?
75
doveadm index -u u0001 at example.jp INBOX
#
2016 Jul 28
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 repost 4/7] virtio-balloon: speed up inflate/deflate process
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:36:18AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> > > > This ends up doing a 1MB kmalloc() right? That seems a _bit_ big.
> > > > How big was the pfn buffer before?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is if the max pfn is more than 32GB.
> > > The size of the pfn buffer use before is 256*4 = 1024 Bytes, it's too
> > > small, and
2016 Jul 28
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 repost 4/7] virtio-balloon: speed up inflate/deflate process
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:36:18AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> > > > This ends up doing a 1MB kmalloc() right? That seems a _bit_ big.
> > > > How big was the pfn buffer before?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is if the max pfn is more than 32GB.
> > > The size of the pfn buffer use before is 256*4 = 1024 Bytes, it's too
> > > small, and
2020 Sep 08
0
[PATCH] Rescan the entire target on transport reset when LUN is 0
> On Sep 8, 2020, at 3:22 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote:
>> VirtIO 1.0 spec says
>> The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY
>> apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator
>> to rescan the target to detect this.
>>
>> This change