similar to: Advanced dovecot tricks - spam review/release

Hi, My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and it looks like there are no false positives, e. g. valid mail is never identified as spam. When a message is flagged as spam, the subject line is rewritten to begin with [SPAM]. Then, a filter in

On 12/18/18 3:34 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 18/12/2018 08:08, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and >> Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and >> Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and >> it looks like there are no false positives, e. g.

Hi In my mailscanner, i have mail in quarantine folder. How can I get back attachement in quarantine folder? I use mail user < message. but the attachment is just coding not the attachment thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081001/e9a9ceb5/attachment-0004.html>

hi I read ( I think in dovecot wiki) that ext2 or ext3 fs on a 2.4 kernel can get slow due to the number of files in a directory. Does anyone know if kernel 2.6 has similar limitation? I'm not at that point now, but before the box goes live, I'm wondering if I should resolve that. Glenn

I like this unofficial survey of hardware but wondering what MTA and spam filtering everyone is using. I do front end spam filtering for other servers as well. (junkemailfilter.com) I'm using Exim 4.61 SpamAssassin 3.11 Some version of DSpam that I'm experimenting with Most of my spam filtering happens on the Exim level. My mail spam filter server is: AMD 3800 Dual Core Athlon 2 100gb

Dear Admin, It seems that mails from our iit.ac.in domain are being marked as spam. It would be nice if something could be done about this. Best Regards Ramakrishna On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Aditya Kamath < adityakamath+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > (I received many emails that my posts were marked spam, so I am re-sending > this from another email address

Hi list! I use Dovecot 1.2.17 (I can't upgrade right now, due to many reasons), controlled by Pacemaker (I have an HA-Cluster). Now I see that Pacemaker restarts often Dovecot. I wrote my own script to manage Dovecot, since Pacemaker does not have his own. My script, by the "monitor" section has this: monitor) if [ ! -e $OCF_RESKEY_pid ]; then

Hello, Our mail server is running CentOS 5.3. I configured postfix with maildrop as the MDA. I had to deal with a strange issue : a user sent an email to an alias, which resolves into several internal addresses. One of these addresses had its mbox filled up (reached the mailbox_size_limit); so maildrop reported a 0x19 error code to postfix, who kept the mail in its queue, and repeatedly resent

Robert's suggestion indeed fixed the problem. I kept thinking those entries were necessary in inetd.conf. Also, kind thanks to Fred Gilbert for his prompt responses.:-) John

Hello all, About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, amavisd-new and clamav break. we are now also at the point where a backup mx will need to be implemented. If necessary I am

Hi, I'd like to make a filtering threshold for users to let them deal with spamassassin spam-level starred < 8 themselves, but spam-level starred higher than 8 should be discarded how can one do that with the "anyof" option ? the following doesn't work with a test email with "gtube", which scores > 999 : # require "fileinto"; if header :matches

I would like to have a list of IPs (hacker list) that I can do a lookup on so that if anyone tries to authenticate to dovecot they always fail if they are on my list. I have the list - and the list is available as a DNS blacklist. I'd like to have it work with both local IP lists or RBL lookup. The idea is so hackers from known IP addresses never succeed. If Dovecot provides the feature

We are running rsync 2.4.6 on HPUX-11and using it to push a document-root from a staging area to several servers running rsync in daemon mode. The rsync client syncs successfully to modules on the same server and to most other machines, but hangs when trying to syncronise across a firewall (from SECURE zone to DMZ) (The firewall port IS OPEN!!) During a normal release where there are rougly

Hi, I'm wondering, whether it's possible, to define an ACL on the mailbox itself. We use Dovecot 1.2.15 (included in Debian 6) and maildir filesystem layout: /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/cur Inbox /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/tmp / /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/new \ /home/mail01/user1/Maildir/.folder1/cur folder1

Hi all I hope no one minds but I was asked to post my timetrial findings back to the list. Hope it helps someone else as well, if you have any suggestions please mention them as I need all the speed that I can get The scenaro is as follows I have to switch mail servers and I need to copy all my mbox files over to the new machine. As you may well know time if off the utmost importance so I

************* Content Filter Notification ************** The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: <s-luppescu at uchicago.edu> Destination mailbox(es): <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> Policy: Dirty Words(shit) Action: Quarantine Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. ******************* End of message *******************

Hello, In my current setup, I uses two mailservers to handle the users connections, and my emails are stored on a distant server using NFS (maildir architecture) Dovecot is both my IMAP server and the delivery agent (LMTP via postfix) To avoid indexing issues related to NFS, proxying is enabled both on IMAP and LMTP. But when a mail is sent to users that are shared between the servers, I got the

Doing an imapc migration with the pop3 migration plugin, using doveadm backup -R. I occasionally get the following output: dsync(user at domain.tld): Error: imapc(mail01.domain.tld:143): Server disconnected unexpectedly dsync(user at domain.tld): Error: imapc(mail01.domain.tld:143): Server disconnected unexpectedly dsync(user at domain.tld): Error: imapc(mail01.domain.tld:143): Server

Hi, # TL;DR I've been building an application with and without the address sanitizer (with gcc 5.3 and clang 3.7.1) and I've observed that the application's behaviour changes (assertion hit/ not hit). I'm wondering if this could be a bug in address sanitizer or if the application I'm running is just buggy (e.g. doing bad things like relying on memory layout, etc.). I'm

Hi Kostya & Yury, Thanks for the advice. On 9 February 2016 at 22:48, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> # TL;DR >> >> I've been building an application with and without the address >> sanitizer (with gcc 5.3 and