similar to: CentOS 5.8, xen kernel, and nfs4

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "CentOS 5.8, xen kernel, and nfs4"

2012 Apr 09
1
Problem with NFS4 and CentOs 5.8
Hi, I hope someone could give me help with following problem on centos 5.8 kernel and nfs4. On server i have bind mounted directory shared to the client with following setup: mounted directory: /srv/nfs/imagetest on /exports/imagetest type none (rw,bind) /etc/exports file: /exports
2010 Oct 15
1
NFS4 + SELinux
All test machines are CentOS 5.5 (RHEL subscriptions purchased). We've had NFS3 storage working fine and decided to try NFS4. We can mount an NFS4 share on our KVM host, but the SELinux file context on the mountpoint directory is magically changed from virt_image_t to nfs_t. Restorecon refuses to change it back. Adding the mount option context=system_u:object_r:virt_image_t on either server
2010 Apr 29
1
nfs4 help needed
Fedora 13 is using nfs4, and there is a problem in opening files requiring OpenOffice if accessed over an nfs3 mount, so it's time to change. I found a couple of tutorials, and got it *almost* working correctly. This is where I need help. Logwatch tells me /nfs4exports/Data1 and /Data1 have same filehandle for *,192.168.0.0/24,192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0, using first
2014 May 06
1
NFS4 idmap question
HTTPD on some of my CentOS5 systems is configured to run as user "nobody". Also, it needs access to some exported file systems. CentOS5 uses NFS3 so I changed the ownership of the files on the storage server to "nobody" to give httpd full permissions. Now I want to rebuild these systems with CentOS6 and httpd running as user "apache". The problem is how to give
2011 May 31
1
Unable to mount Centos 5.6 Server via nfs4 - Operation Not Permitted - MADNESS!
After getting a reasonably configured NFS4 setup working on my Scientific Linux server, I spent a majority of my evening trying to do the same with my Centos 5 box, with fruitless results. Most attempts to mount that server returns the following message: [root at sl01 log]# mount -t nfs4 192.168.15.200:/opt/company_data /mnt mount.nfs4: Operation not permitted As nearest as I can
2018 Mar 06
0
NFS-Ganesha, Gluster and file creation
Hi All, I know this isn't the ganesha mailing list but wondered if anyone can help. I'm having issue with file creation over NFS, I have a gluster volume "vol1" presented via Ganesha with the following config:EXPORT{? ? ? ? Export_Id = 20;? ? ? ? Path = "/vol1";? ? ? ? FSAL {? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? name = GLUSTER;? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? hostname = "gnfs01";? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
2010 Mar 27
2
Network tuning for working with very old Solaris
G'day. I am trying to get a very old Solaris 5.7 server to ftp data to my updated CentOS 5.4 server but the Solaris box keeps losing networking after sending some data. I can't ping the Solaris box from any of the servers on my network. Could this be related to a much newer (modern) TCP/IP stack in Linux and TCP options? If so, does anyone have any suggestions for how I can tune
2012 Oct 03
1
Retraction: Protocol stacking: gluster over NFS
Hi All, Well, it <http://goo.gl/hzxyw> was too good to be true. Under extreme, extended IO on a 48core node, some part of the the NFS stack collapses and leads to an IO lockup thru NFS. We''ve replicated it on 48core and 64 core nodes, but don''t know yet whether it acts similarly on lower-core-count nodes. Tho I haven''t had time to figure out
2010 Jun 29
1
NFS(4) IMAP Quota
Hi *, We use nfs4 in combination with dovecot. Also (hard)quotas are used on the exports. Using the dovecot quota fs plugin things did not work at all. There were a few issues we encountered: 1. Nfs4 is not recognized. The problem is that the mount type is only checked for "nfs" and not nfs4. This was an easy fix. 2. The (fs)path for nfs4 that is relayed to rquotad has to be without
2020 Jul 13
2
Dovecot permission denied errors on NFS after upgrade to 2.2.17
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those
2009 Mar 09
2
Nfs4 with kerberos freezing system
Hello, I have a CentOS 5.2 server that exports /home on the local network for 2 users by secure nfs4 with kerberos krb5p. The clients are a notebook and a desktop pc. The following error is always reproducible on all clients. If running the clients on high load, that means for example 5 firefox windows open and connected with www pages from the internet, installing the new qt development
2008 Oct 15
1
Seeking advice about auth/home serving
Hi, I'm currently using nis/nfs3/autofs in a small network (20 boxes), and planning on using a more secure/elegant method. The thing is, which solution to adopt ? The network is mainly composed of Centos boxes, and a couple MS/Win ones. ldap/kerberos/nfs4 ? Directory Server ? Anything else ? Another point is, we have several servers with a local /data. Is there any
2011 Nov 17
1
nfs4 problem in CENTOS6
Hi, This is slightly offtopic, but I have been trying to resolve that problem for two days now without much success. It looks like this may be something that works with CENTOS5, but not with CENTOS6! I have two machines, fileserver1 and server5. fileserver1 runs on CENTOS6 (virtualized, if this is important), server5 runs on Centos5. Both are running with the most recent updates. Server5 is a
2009 Feb 01
1
nfs4 support
Hi, does klibc's mount support nfs4? Any ideas how hard is it to get nfs4-utils build against klibc for encryption support? Julius
2010 Apr 21
3
Help with NFSV4 server
Hi Everyone, I have been trying to setup an NFS v4 File Server but have come across an odd issue. Mounting the /nfs4exports/share appears to be successful and the information displayed about partition size and free space seem correct but if I try to do anything inside the mounted directory the client will just hang. Does anyone have any idea what I am missing?? I have try
2010 Dec 06
0
2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 NFS4 race conditions?
Are there any known race conditions with 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 x86_64 and NFS4? Today a user managed to shut down two identical Intel servers by copying a simple text file via NFS4. Reverting back to 17.1 made the error disappear. On other non-identical hardware the error was not reproducible (so it must be a combination of hardware and this special kernel revision). Anybody interested in a
2005 Aug 21
0
nfs4 on CentSO4.1
I'm struggling to get nfs v4 going at the moment- following instructions from http://www.brennan.id.au/19-Network_File_System.html#nfs4 Can anyone else confirm that they already have nfs4 working ok, just to give me heart to continue fighting? -- Cheers, Tony -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2011 Oct 27
1
Use ACL over NFS4
I have an NFS4 server exporting a folder, and a Samba server importing that folder which it then turns around and shares over Samba. I would like Windows machines accessing this folder and its sub folders to be properly restricted according to ACLs. The NFS4 server is running CentOS 5.7 and is NFS exporting an EXT4 folder. The Samba server is running CentOS 6.0, and Samba 3.5.4-68.el6_0.2. On the
2013 Jun 20
1
Samba4 and NFSv4
Is it possible that Samba4 includes a large PAC on the kerberos credential and you're going over the limit in kernel? Against AD you have to disable this PAC inclusion via the userAccountControl attribute to make kerberised NFSv4 work correctly. You /sometimes/ find that testing with a user who is a member of as close to no groups as possible works in this case, but users in many
2013 Jun 20
1
Samba4 and NFSv4
Is it possible that Samba4 includes a large PAC on the kerberos credential and you're going over the limit in kernel? Against AD you have to disable this PAC inclusion via the userAccountControl attribute to make kerberised NFSv4 work correctly. You /sometimes/ find that testing with a user who is a member of as close to no groups as possible works in this case, but users in many