Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Blog post on Power management and NUT #1: an introduction"
2006 Mar 15
1
Common Power Management with UPS support (was: NUT-NG)
Hi fellows,
As the NUT-NG draft will take me more time than I currently have (I
found myself too optimistic since I got a baby ;-), below is the
beginning of an answer to the "Common Power Management with UPS
support" problem...
First, NUT is pure userspace code, for portability issue, and will remain.
USB is through libusb, snmp through net-snmp and serial through
standard read/write.
2006 Aug 01
2
Common Power Management : NUT and HAL (stage 1)
Hi fellows,
I'm really pleased to announce that a first stage of NUT and HAL [1]
integration has been reached: NUT drivers (in fact, only newhidups,
tripplite_usb and bcmxcp_usb for the moment) can feed HAL data.
It's a "quick and dirty" hack, as a proof of concept, and there is
still lots of things to be done, both on NUT and HAL sides.
But it's a good base, and very
2005 Nov 15
2
Fwd: RE New xanto driver for NUT
please keep the list cc'ed when replying me.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net>
Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36
Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT
To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com>
Hello Arnaud,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> is there really a need to separate it from the megatec.
> we're currently
2005 Nov 15
2
Fwd: RE New xanto driver for NUT
please keep the list cc'ed when replying me.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net>
Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36
Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT
To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com>
Hello Arnaud,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> is there really a need to separate it from the megatec.
> we're currently
2007 Jan 08
1
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r716 - in trunk: . drivers
Arnaud,
you changed the "if" part, perhaps you'd like to change the "else"
part, too?
Changing the output format of HIDDumpTree() has the potential to break
the functionality of scripts/subdriver/path-to-subdriver.sh; I don't
think it does in this instance, but I have not checked it. Perhaps it
would be good to add a comment in the source code as a caution.
-- Peter
2006 Mar 29
2
POWER WALKER LINE-INTERACTIVE VI1000
can you also give a try to megatec and send us back some upsc output
of your various tests?
Mathias Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Arnaud QUETTE wrote:
> > > Mathias Mayrhofer wrote:
> it works (except of the temperature)
>
> thanks a million!!
>
> > > Sorry to bother you,
> > > 'nut' is great (it was the only thing that worked on by belkin usv),
>
2008 Jun 24
2
Fwd: DeviceKit-power patches
I forgot to cc you guys on the future evolution of the HAL support
(it's replacement in fact, called DeviceKit)
A mailing list dedicated to DeviceKit is under creation.
If some of you are interested in, just answer back.
-- Arnaud
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
Date: 2008/6/24
Subject: Re: DeviceKit-power patches
To: Richard
2011 Nov 25
0
NUT QA regression testing script (was: Upgraded Buildbot)
Hey Charles and the list,
2011/11/13 Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>:
>
> 2011/11/12 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > since I'm working on improving the Ubuntu regression testing suite [1],
>> > which can also serve for
2012 Jan 23
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r3407 - trunk/docs/man
Argh!
habits are hard to change.
I've fixed the message again on the server, to satisfy the git format...
Arnaud
--
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
2012/1/23 Arnaud Quette <aquette
2011 Sep 05
3
Scheduling 2.6.2 release (was: on Ubuntu Developer Summit (Oneiric), NUT and 2.8.0)
Hey,
I'm scheduling a 2.6.2 release for max. September 15.
The content will be lighter than first expected with 2.8.0 (see below).
This includes the current trunk plus:
- merge the nut-scanner branch,
- some snmp-ups improvements (sysOID matching for init stage) and some more
MIBs,
- a first complete version of the nut-ipmipsu driver,
- the new jNut Java binding,
- preliminary support of
2007 Sep 03
0
Tr : adding Jageson Technology JASUNY UPS support to NUT
Hi Shanan,
Since I'm lagging too much on this point, I've forwarded your mail to the
NUT development list, in the hope that another developer will have a bit
of time to merge your patch.
thanks for your contribution,
Arnaud Quette
--
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -
2007 Sep 14
1
Bug#441342: Nut can kill power to UPSs that never went on battery
tags 441342 upstream
thanks
Hi Robert,
thanks for your report and investigation.
We will check to fix this and give you news back.
2007/9/9, Robert Woodcock <rcw at debian.org>:
> Package: nut
> Version: 2.2.0-2
> Severity: important
>
> I recently set up nut at work to monitor the 15 APC Smart-UPS 1500s we have
> in our server room. Since we currently only have one
2007 Feb 08
2
Re: INFOSEC 500 XP USB on Debian using nut
Hi Arnaud,
Is there any news about this hardware,does nut managed it right now ?
Is there any technical information to make it working on debian ?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
DaneZ
_____
From: Arnaud QUETTE [mailto:Arnaud.QUETTE@mgeups.com]
To: DaneZ [mailto:david.guillotte@danez.no-ip.org]
Sent: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:07:03 +0200
Subject: Re: RE Fw: INFOSEC 500 XP
2009 May 21
1
Nut and PowerWare 5115
Hi Arnaud,
Any luck with the latest subversion trunk?
From: Greg
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:34 PM
To: Greg ; Arnaud Quette
Cc: Kjell Claesson ; nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Nut and PowerWare 5115
Hi Arnaud,
Some more testing on Ubuntu 9.04.
Here is the output of bcmxcp_usb and lsusb
============================================
root at
2008 Feb 02
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1264 - in trunk: . drivers m4 scripts/hal
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> Author: aquette
> Date: Fri Feb 1 23:11:33 2008
> New Revision: 1264
>
> Log:
> fix HAL support installation [Alioth Bug #304156]
Arnaud,
I tried to fix some of the errors that I was seeing in buildbot, but I
still get the following error on "make distcheck", and I don't know
how
2011 Apr 28
0
[nut-commits] svn commit r2978 - trunk/docs/website
a comment on the below commit...
2011/4/27 Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>
> Author: aquette
> Date: Wed Apr 27 15:42:33 2011
> New Revision: 2978
> URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2978
>
> Log:
> Enable website quirks to address Internet Explorer 6, which were missing
> since 2.6.0 publication
> (...)
>
the website
2011 Jun 07
0
[nut-commits] svn commit r3010 - trunk/docs
side note on this commit...
2011/5/31 Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>
> Author: aquette
> Date: Tue May 31 09:00:57 2011
> New Revision: 3010
> URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3010
>
> Log:
> Update Subversion access information, following Alioth update
>
> Modified:
> trunk/docs/download.txt
>
> Modified:
2005 Jul 21
0
Re: Nut-upsuser Digest, Vol 1, Issue 28
> The directory /etc/nut created at .deb install time is
> O755 root:nut
Could be. Then I guess I did the "chmod 660" for the folder + its files at
once.
> although 750 is also fine, but might
> prevent some access to non secured files
Yeah, made it 751 since, so I can use the cgi status script. That's as fancy
as it gets in my setup ;)
Well, unless it turns out the
2007 May 31
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r936 - in trunk: . packaging/redhat
Hi Tomas,
2007/5/30, Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>:
> Author: adkorte-guest
> Date: Wed May 30 19:34:50 2007
> New Revision: 936
>
> Log:
> - remove IPv6 patch (is already in the trunk)
> - always start driver(s) through upsdrvctl (the old method
> of starting them directly with command line parameters
> without configuring ups.conf no
2005 Oct 10
1
Re: Bug#332939: nut-usb: Needs an udev rule for udev >= 0.070-3
salut Jean-Luc,
2005/10/9, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <jean-luc.coulon@wanadoo.fr>:
>
> Package: nut-usb
> Version: 2.0.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The latest version of udev: 0.070-3 conficts with hotplug.
> This means that while the new udev includes the hotplug functionalities,
> the rules in /etc/hotplug/usb/libhidups and /etc/hotplug/usb/libhid.usermap