similar to: Update: Hanging IMAP sessions on Mac OS X with dovecot 2.1.10 - worked fine with 2.0.15 (and 2.0.21)

Ok, here's a toughie: Out of a whim (and because of the bad weather) I today decided to upgrade my completely functioning 2.0.15 installation on my Mac OS X 10.6.7 system. NB: It's not a Mac OS X "Server", as sold by Apple - I have compiled my dovecots myself for quite a while. Anyhow: At first everything appeared to work fine after the upgrade. Up until I created a new user

> Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:45:34 +0000 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] proctitle woes with 2.0.7 vs. 2.0.6 > To: Clemens Schrimpe <csch at kiez.net> > Cc: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Message-ID: <1289839534.1764.138.camel at kurkku.sapo.corppt.com> > Content-Type: text/plain;

I want tinc to listen locally on loopback, so that port 655 is not exposed on any system interfaces. Can't tinc make outbound connections when listening on loopback? I can't see any reason why it should. This system will never have other tinc daemons connect to it, it will only ever connect to other tinc daemons in order to establish a VPN connection. -- Jonny Tyers On Sat, 17 Nov 2018

While digging through the code I remember having seen something like an (yet undocumented) "update_query" for SQL (and I guess something similar for the LDAP faction as well)?! Can that be used to augment the "doveadm pw" function to actually /set/ the password for a given user instead of just "calculating" the hash, so that an operator can copy&waste it into the

Hello - I just noticed, that there seems to be a change in the way "process titles" are being set between 2.0.6 and 2.0.7: Behavior of 2.0.6: (ps aux | fgrep dovecot) ------------------ root 30803 0.0 0.0 601540 708 ?? S 1:08AM 0:00.00 dovecot/log _dovecot 30802 0.0 0.0 601544 624 ?? S 1:08AM 0:00.00 dovecot/anvil root 30801 0.0 0.0

Hi there, Thanks for tinc, firstly. It's awesome. Now, I've found that if I specify: BindAddress = 127.0.0.1 655 Then my tincd cannot make outbound connections (on attempting to connect to another tinc daemon is receives 'Invalid argument'). Removing BindAddress fixes the issue. Unless I've misunderstood the purpose of this option, is this a bug? I'm running v1.0.35 on

Hello All (and Timo in particular :-) -- While reading through some of the conversations on this list over the past two weeks or so, I always thought "how would <this> particular problem affect you and how would you address it in your environment?". This results in a few suggestions, or "thing to wish for", which I thought others may find useful, hence I'm posting

So, Keir, can you please check in this patch? Thanks Yunhong Jiang >-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >John Clemens >Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:35 AM >To: Jiang, Yunhong >Cc: Li, Xin B; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix qemu-dm

Hi, Thunderbird uses the following IMAP command to list shared folders: . list "" INBOX.shared.%.% Dovecot 2.1.10 does not list any folders in response to this command. Dovecot 2.0.21 does list them: * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.shared.user1.folder" . OK List completed. Both versions list the folders if "*" is used instead of

The "-a" option (the "--links", "--perms", "--devices", and "--times" options are redundant, as they, as well as "--owner", "--group", and "--recursive" are implied by "-a" )does dictate that permissions on files being sent be brought over from the source. Are all files losing permissions, or only files

Dear list, is there anyone who successfully compiled a Samba 3.0.X on a Solaris 9 box? I tried severl versions of Samba 3.0.* on five rather differently configured Solaris 9 boxes (Sparc) and ALWAYS get a build error on dynconfig.c Sometimes it seems to be a missing ldap-preprocessor define (which is protested by the compiler although I configured --with-ldap=NO), sometimes it is a header file

Hello all, I have a couple of questions about using the user home directories. Is it nesscary to keep the smbpasswd file in sync with the passwd file. When user level securitiy is turned on. From what I have been able to figure out is that these files do not automagically sync up and that the only real way to keep them in sync is to do it manually, unforutaly from what I have been able to

Hi, John Can you try the attached patch ? This issue can be reproduced on SMP platform, while the domain 0 is UP. The reason is, after finishing a dma request, the dma thread will trigger the interrupt and then clear the call back function. When guest get the interrupt , it will try to check the call back function, if it is set, then it will trigger a dma request again. So if the checking for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joseph, I've resolved this problem for myself by changind the order of lookups : $>cat /etc/nsswitch.conf group: pgsql files passwd: pgsql files .... but it'd be a good idea to compile add the ncsd (nis caching daemon). then the file will look like this group: cache files pgsql etc... as far as I looked at the code I think the problem

Hi Clemens - thanks for your response. Clemens Hammacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > since noone of the experts answered, let me share our experiences. We > recently had exactly the same problem, I posted on this list on January > 31st. > I didn't follow Duncans advice to "just use the linker", since for > several reasons we wanted to have unique struct types

On 2/2/12 2:32 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 02/02/12 14:25, Clemens Hammacher wrote: >> On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > ... >>> what do you mean by "copied over to the main module"? If you want to add >>> additional IR to the main module then you should link it in using the >>> linker. >> >> I think that the linker would indeed

Hi Clemens, On 02/02/12 14:25, Clemens Hammacher wrote: > On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: ... >> what do you mean by "copied over to the main module"? If you want to add >> additional IR to the main module then you should link it in using the linker. > > I think that the linker would indeed be able to remap the types correctly, but > the main obstacle here

Hi Clemens, > thanks for your comments. > >>> First, consider this function: >>> #include <stdint.h> >>> uint64_t foo(uint64_t *bar) { >>> *bar = 42; >>> return (uint64_t)bar & 3; >>> } >>> >>> Which is compiled to >>> define i64 @foo(i64* %bar) nounwind uwtable ssp {

On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 02/02/12 13:30, Clemens Hammacher wrote: >> On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> I have to ask: why are you writing these modules out as separate bc files? >> >> I knew that someone would ask that ;) >> We need to have separate modules during runtime. One of them contains the code >> that is actually JIT

hi, it'd be useul if the centosplus and contrib directory can contain a small readme file or some kind of documentaion about the rpm inside. currently there is not any kind of such docs (ok johnny send a description about the kernel rpms, but if someone missed that email). eg the postfix rpm has the same description and changelog inside the rpm as the original ones. if someone just look into