similar to: Gluster's read performance

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Gluster's read performance"

2006 Jan 17
1
Asterisk LDAP Authentication Problem
Hi I want to authenticate the asterisk users from the LDAP directory server not from the sip.conf. I tried to use the astirectory-1.2<http://www.asterisk-ev.org/download/astirectory-1.2-0.3.tgz>. But i am not able to configure it properly. If somebody used it then please help. In the res_ldap.conf file i made the following entries. I am using my normal username and password to connect my
2006 Jan 06
2
Not Able to Connect Two Asterisk Servers Using IAX2
Hi I have two asterisk servers. I just want to connect two asterisk server using IAX2. But the Asterisk Servers are not able to register each other. If some body have done this then Please send me the configuration they have done in iax.conf and extensions.conf. I simply want to connect and call from one sever to another. Thanks Chandan Kumar Mishra Software Engg. -------------- next part
2011 Feb 24
1
Experiencing errors after adding new nodes
Hi, I had a 2 node distributed cluster running on 3.1.1 and I added 2 more nodes. I then ran a rebalance on the cluster. Now I am getting permission denied errors and I see the following in the client logs: [2011-02-24 09:59:10.210166] I [dht-common.c:369:dht_revalidate_cbk] loader-dht: subvolume loader-client-3 returned -1 (Invalid argument) [2011-02-24 09:59:11.851656] I
2017 Oct 19
3
gluster tiering errors
All, I am new to gluster and have some questions/concerns about some tiering errors that I see in the log files. OS: CentOs 7.3.1611 Gluster version: 3.10.5 Samba version: 4.6.2 I see the following (scrubbed): Node 1 /var/log/glusterfs/tier/<vol>/tierd.log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Promotion failed
2017 Oct 22
0
gluster tiering errors
Herb, What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low What is the size of the file that failed to migrate as per the following tierd log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Promotion failed for
2017 Oct 24
2
gluster tiering errors
Milind - Thank you for the response.. >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi Option Value ------ ----- cluster.watermark-hi 90 # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low Option
2017 Oct 27
0
gluster tiering errors
Herb, I'm trying to weed out issues here. So, I can see quota turned *on* and would like you to check the quota settings and test to see system behavior *if quota is turned off*. Although the file size that failed migration was 29K, I'm being a bit paranoid while weeding out issues. Are you still facing tiering errors ? I can see your response to Alex with the disk space consumption and
2017 Oct 22
1
gluster tiering errors
There are several messages "no space left on device". I would check first that free disk space is available for the volume. On Oct 22, 2017 18:42, "Milind Changire" <mchangir at redhat.com> wrote: > Herb, > What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi > > # gluster volume get
2012 Mar 19
1
Google Summer of Code 2012
Greetings everyone. My name is Chandan and I am a Junior student from National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India. I have come to know that Xapian is participating in Google Summer of Code this year. I am interested in contributing to Xapian. I have gone through the project ideas list and found some of them really interesting. I am particularly interested in the project on *Weighting Schemes
2006 Jan 18
1
LDAP direct authentication Problem
Hi I need to authenticate all the asterisk users from the LDAP server instead of from sip.conf. If anybody already have done this then please guide. I tried to integrate authenticate asterisk users from LDAP using the open source project astirectory1.2.0. After using the astirectory1.2.0 , now when the asterisk starts then it registeres with the LDAP. Following logs shows it. Jan 18 18:36:20
2018 Apr 11
3
volume start: gv01: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.
On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: Hey Alex, With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: cluster.quorum-type: none cluster.server-quorum-type: none Thank you for that. Cheers, Tom > Hi, > > You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you > need to
2018 Apr 11
0
volume start: gv01: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:35 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: > Hey Alex, > > With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is > missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: > > cluster.quorum-type: none > cluster.server-quorum-type: none > > yes this disables
2012 Feb 22
2
"mismatching layouts" errors after expanding volume
Dear All- There are a lot of the following type of errors in my client and NFS logs following a recent volume expansion. [2012-02-16 22:59:42.504907] I [dht-layout.c:682:dht_layout_dir_mismatch] 0-atmos-dht: subvol: atmos-replicate-0; inode layout - 0 - 0; disk layout - 9203501 34 - 1227133511 [2012-02-16 22:59:42.534399] I [dht-common.c:524:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0-atmos-dht: mismatching
2018 Feb 05
2
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hi, I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 122440868 [2018-02-04 07:41:16.244261] W [fuse-bridge.c:2398:fuse_writev_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse:
2011 May 07
1
Gluster "Peer Rejected"
Hello All, I have 8 servers.? 7 of the 8 say that gbe02 is in state State: Peer Rejected (Connected). gbe08 says it is connected to the other?7? but they are all State: Peer Rejected (Connected) So it would appear that gbe02 is out of sync with the group. I triggered a manual self heal by doing a the recommended ./find on a gluster mount. I'm stuck... I cannot find ANY docs on this
2018 Apr 06
1
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
Sorry for the delay, Ian :). This looks to be a genuine issue which requires some effort in fixing it. Can you file a bug? I need following information attached to bug: * Client and bricks logs. If you can reproduce the issue, please set diagnostics.client-log-level and diagnostics.brick-log-level to TRACE. If you cannot reproduce the issue or if you cannot accommodate such big logs, please set
2018 Feb 05
2
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hello Nithya! Thank you so much, I think we are close to build a stable storage solution according to your recommendations. Here's our rebalance log - please don't pay attention to error messages after 9AM - this is when we manually destroyed volume to recreate it for further testing. Also all remove-brick operations you could see in the log were executed manually when recreating volume.
2018 Feb 05
0
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
On 5 February 2018 at 15:40, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: > [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] > 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing > [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] > [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no
2010 Mar 04
1
[3.0.2] booster + unfsd failed
Hi list. I have been testing with glusterfs-3.0.2. glusterfs mount works well. unfsd on glusterfs mount point works well too. When using booster, unfsd realpath check failed. But ls util works well. I tried 3.0.0-git head source build but result was same. My System is Ubuntu 9.10 and using unfsd source from official gluster download site. Any comment appreciated!! - kpkim root at
2011 Oct 18
2
gluster rebalance taking three months
Hi guys, we have a rebalance running on eight bricks since July and this is what the status looks like right now: ===Tue Oct 18 13:45:01 CST 2011 ==== rebalance step 1: layout fix in progress: fixed layout 223623 There are roughly 8T photos in the storage,so how long should this rebalance take? What does the number (in this case) 22362 represent? Our gluster infomation: Repository