similar to: RHSA-2012:1288 libxml2 security update for centos6 skiped?

Dear R experts, I just upgraded R from 1.8.1 to 1.9.0 version. My .First() function in ~/.Rprofile contains x11() and par() functions. .First <- function() { x11(display = "", 8.0, 5.0) par(las = 1, ...) ## ... } And, R claims now, on startup: [hello messages skiped ...] Error in .First() : couldn't find function "x11" > I commented

After fixing nested () problem manual run nighttest finished successfully with one remarkable logged problem: INITIALIZED CVS Root = :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:2401/var/cvs/llvm BuildDir = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/build WebDir = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/testresults-X86-FreeBSD Prefix = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/2004-09-06

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1288 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5dfc8775c5e2c3d80bbf2156d92133f47bd1c91a0849e85089e0599136e5837e libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.15.el5_8.5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1288 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2b6de2c0535cb046fe2f14403593c7bf861642a053c3d3bc8a33de2bf7bf7195 libxml2-2.7.6-8.el6_3.3.i686.rpm

The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily) skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created. So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what happens when you give -R --no-dirs? I tried and it seems that intermediate dirs are considered anyway, so it looks like -R overrides --no-dirs. Is it true? Does it depend on the order of options?

Hi, I have several time series that I need to plot on the same plot. There are 3 problems with these series: 1. they do not start or end at the same times 2. they have different time intervals (seconds, minutes or hours) 3. they all have random missing time steps of a few step to longer periods of several days The data is imported from a database as POSIXct so that the first column holds the

Hello everyone, i try to use Samba RODC(4.6.5) with W2K8R2. Windows AD has around 35000 objects. My Samba machine is small one (ARM 32bit CPU) with only 2GB physical memory, so i can’t join to the domain because of expensive memory usage. To solve this Problem, i decide to replicate only critical objects and then let samba_kcc to get other objects. 1 ) Is this an possible way to use Samba AD or

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1288 Bug ID: 1288 Summary: Assertion `cnt <= 1' failed in gmputil.c:67: mpz_get_uint32 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Okay, I'll have to fix NightlyTest.pl not to use shell script syntax that isn't universal. Look for a commit soon. Reid. On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 13:31, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > > Bash 2.05b on Linux handles this fine. I was asking what > > your "default" system shell is on FreeBSD. Probably /bin/sh, right? > > Perhaps you can: > > > >

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Andrew Bartlett via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 18:40 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba acl it > > On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 17:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:15:17 +1300 > >

CentOS team: has the CentOS kernel update come out yet that addresses what upstream sent out the email this morning RHSA-2013:0223-1, which mentions a bugfix for a deadlock when oom-killer's invoked? mark

Hi, I'm working on a RHSA tracking tool, named Sarah. It allows you to build a local RHSA database of different RHEL releases and then allows you to verify systems for compliance (and lists applicable RHSA and required packages). But before releasing my prototype, I would like to know what requirements people have. How they would be using such a tool and what for reports they need to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1288 Tom Ueltschi <bugzilla.mindrot.org at ueltschi.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.mindrot.org at ueltsch | |i.net ---

Apologies if i missed this on the list but is there a fix for this available to 6.0? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html thanks

Hi It seems the fix for CVE-2019-9636 has slipped through the cracks as the SRPM has not been rebuilt and made available for CentOS 6. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-9636 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1467 Kind Regards, Andrew

> On 19 Jun 2019, at 16:53, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > I see this in the build log, right about the end: > > RPM build errors: > File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-2.6.6-68.el6_10.x86_64/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload/ossaudiodev.so > File not found: >

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0836 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0836.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b9bd68fd5161263814580032fdcd3b1c libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm 2a2107f6e99afd3c0e0cfef742cf2a96 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0836 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0836.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 9b6e135244e4079824ae1341a30b1fa7 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm af041f25eb0535c1fa87702f74aa00be libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c9d9261d1e0b5ce5efe84b307b28d36f libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm 6f6972d2dee83c7e90bf1232d4b27a8f libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: d9eb2d4b0e23d818337b428cb140eabc libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm 6aba61ac92595c7647e25fde08cd3344 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64.rpm