similar to: Released Pigeonhole v0.3.2 for Dovecot v2.1.9

Hi Stephan, I'm traying to rebuild the RH (Centos) EL5 and EL6 RPM with the last mercurial pigeonhole 0.4.2 version, but I'm having problems with the build. I think that I've isolated the problem outside rpmbuild context. I've downloaded dovecot and pigeonhole mercurial versions and built dovecot with the commands: dovecot-2.2.10$ ./autogen.sh dovecot-2.2.10$ ./configure

I am building dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole-0.2.1 (dovecot-2.0.5, but that does not matter) with dovecot-config in place (in /usr/lib64/dovecot) on a 64bit Linux (RHEL5): ./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/lib64/dovecot The libs needed for several executables in libexec such as /usr/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login are not installed in /usr/lib64 but in /usr/lib64/dovecot. Therefore the executable

Hi i have a problem compiling as mantioned on object of this mail: i'm changing dovecot on my debian 6 from version 2.2.32 to 2.2.36 and pigeonhole from 0.4.20 to 0.4.24 this is output of dovecot -n for listing versions installed dovecot -n # 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.20 (7cd71ba) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.10 i have

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.9.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.9.tar.gz.sig I've again mostly finished reading and answering most of the mails in Dovecot mailing list. There are a couple annoyingly difficult / time consuming bugreport mails that I haven't replied to yet, but if anyone thinks I should have replied to something already feel free to resend

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.9.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.9.tar.gz.sig I've again mostly finished reading and answering most of the mails in Dovecot mailing list. There are a couple annoyingly difficult / time consuming bugreport mails that I haven't replied to yet, but if anyone thinks I should have replied to something already feel free to resend

I had to manually quote in dovecot-config LIBDOVECOT_LOGIN='-ldovecot-login -lssl -lcrypto ' by default was LIBDOVECOT_LOGIN=-ldovecot-login -lssl -lcrypto That cause pigeonhole to failed. Regards nanashi

hi all edit via vi editor to change dovecot.sieve and enotify works fine.but when I telnet 4190 port via managesieve to edit it with the same code,the managesieve said "NO "Error in MANAGESIEVE command CHECKSCRIPT: "", find many topic in wiki and maillist but not solved. need you help!thanks!!dovecot version 2.2.15,pigonhole version 0.4.4 here are more infos

dovecot-2.1.8 sieve-0.3.1 binutils-2.22 When dovecot and sieve is linked with ld.gold I get a segfault in checkscript command: $ telnet localhost 4190 [some output] authenticate "PLAIN" "<base64_username_password>" [some more output] checkscript "foobarscript" connection closed Logs: 2012-07-12T19:30:23.624158+00:00 bob dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.8

Hi, I'm getting segfaults and unexpected disconnects from managesieve server, when the Thunderbird SIEVE extension tries to validate SIEVE scripts agains Pidgeonhole in Dovecot 2.1.8. The extension says: "Server terminated unexpectedly the connection, click on reconnect to try again." It can be reproduced by simply calling CHECKSCRIPT followed by a string: mail01:~# telnet

Hi, when I try to compile dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.3 on my NAS I get the error below and I have no idea why and who to fix this. I have a Qnap TS239pro NAS with a Intel Atom CPU running Linux. I installed and configured the ipkg dovecot packet (1.2.beta1). Getting mails via fetchmail and send them with deliver to the IMAP. Not I want to include sieve to filter mails as this is not part of the

Hi there I have a weird situation. I have inherited a project in Rails 1.2.3 that has been upgraded to Rails 2.3.14 (and is running). I have installed Cucumber and Rspec to start to write features/tests for the new code that needs to be written. In my Gemfile, these Gems are loaded: group :test do gem ''rspec-rails'', ''~> 1.3.4'', :require =>

Hi all, I've setup samba4 according to the samba4 wiki on centOS 5.4 in KVM. This went without any problems. I only had to install a higher version of bind to 9.6.x because Centos bind in repo will install version 9.3.x. I've used the Fedora12 source rpms for this to build bind 9.6.x on Centos 5.4. Then I configured bind according to the samba wiki

For some time I have been using rsync to backup data between different machines and my NAS drive. But within the last 2 days I have found out that rsync is not removing old files from destination - directories renamed or removed from source. In this example I want to sync files on my Debian Linux server to a NAS drive. NAS drive is mounted using smbmount. Using "-avhzn" dry-run it

I find one row in my large dataset. But when I use the "rownames" for the data on the 100,000 row, the result show nothing. I try it by the following example, it still likes that. > tst[rownames(tst)==100000,] [1] x y <0 rows> (or 0-length row.names) ############## > tst=data.frame(x=1:200000,y=200000:1) > tst[rownames(tst)==1,] x y 1 1 200000 >

Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23 This is the error that I get gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../src/lib-sieve -I../../../src/lib-sieve/util -I../../../src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment -I/home/jc/rpmbuild/BUILD/dovecot-2.2.23/src/imap

A large test I ran on flac 1.0 recently finished so I thought I'd post the results. I took about 60 CDs, totalling around 30 gigs uncompressed, and compressed them all using all 10 of flac's default compression modes (-0 through -9). The CDs are of a wide variety of music; I think the only major genres not represented are country and rap (freudian slip). Anyway, the raw numbers: Opt

Hi, I'm trying the brlr function in a penalized logistic regression function. However, I am not sure why I am encountering errors. I hope to seek your advice here. (output below) Thank you! Your help is truly appreciated. Min-Han #No error here, the glm seems to work fine >

Dear useRs, How come the first attempt to sort a POSIXt vector fails (Error: non-atomic type in greater), while the second succeeds? (Code inserted below.) The documentation says that POSIXt is used to allow operations such as subtraction, so I'd expect sorting to work. Is this perhaps an OS issue? (I run R 2.0.1 on Win xp.) Thank you, b. #------------code test <- c("2005-02-08

Hi All... I haven?t found mention of this error anywhere. I'm trying to draw spline curves using grid graphics. Most of the time, I have no problems, but I have some data sets that give the error in the subject line. I'm not sure which end points are identical, but the end points passed to the function are definitely not identical. Any assistance appreciated! Bryan tst <-

Hi, I am working with lists whose terms are lists whose terms are lists. Although the real ones contain locuslink identifiers and GO annotations (I work with the Bioconductor GO) package, I have prepared an simplified example of what I have and what I would like to do with it: Imagine I have a list such as: