Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "CEBA-2012:1291 CentOS 6 graphviz FASTTRACK Update"
2012 Sep 19
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
	centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
	centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2007 Jan 12
2
Best graphviz settings
So,
Anyone playing with the graph files yet?  Just wondering if anyone has 
discovered a really good set of parameters to pass to dot to get the best 
looking graphs (OmniGraffle looks nice but I don''t want to pay for anything 
and want a way to generate graphics from the command-line).
-- DK
2009 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I
> want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are
> chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling
> certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when
> invoking the compiler
2018 Nov 28
1
Fix issue with graphviz file format
Hello,
Here's a quick patch to secure node names in generated graphviz
network maps.
Thanks for tinc!
2013 Dec 15
1
graphviz
Hi,
I propose that the "ad-hoc connections" (localdiscovery) are also
displayed in the graph (graphdumpfile) as it is useful for debugging.
I find the command-line tooling a bit cumbersome to find out where the
problem is - maybe a web-interface can be added to tincd? Implementing a
http server is trivial I found out.
Folkert van Heusden
-- 
Curious about the inner workings of your
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ioannis Nousias <
ioannis.nousias at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> Also, LLVM-TV seems outdated. I've tried to compile it with 2.5 LLVM and
> >> got various errors due to API changes. Tried to correct them, but got
> >> overwhelmed. Has the project been abandoned?
> >
> > Yes, it is really really old and abandoned.
2009 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
I've tried to write a DFGPrinter based on the CFGPrinter, as you 
suggested, but encountered problems.
The GraphWriter expects 
GraphTraits<GraphType>::nodes_begin()/nodes_end(). The way this is 
implemented in CFG.h, a function is a graph of basic blocks. A 
GraphTraits<Function*>  inherits from GraphTraits<BasicBlock*>, and 
implements those nodes_begin()/nodes_end()
2009 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:17 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
> 
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I
> > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are
> > chained together. The documentation mentions
2009 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ioannis Nousias <
> ioannis.nousias at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Also, LLVM-TV seems outdated. I've tried to compile it with 2.5 LLVM
>> and
>> >> got various errors due to API changes. Tried to correct them, but got
>>
2009 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Chris Lattner wrote:
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I
> want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are
> chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling
> certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when
>
2012 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Hi Carlos,
> I am new to this list, and hope this question is pertinent to this mailing
> list.
Welcome!
> Stmt::viewAST is only available in debug builds on systems with Graphviz or
> gv!
You need to actually build Clang in debug mode for this particular
method to be available, which is very likely why you're seeing this
error. I don't think that Clang builds shipped with
2009 Aug 13
1
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Hi Ioannis,
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote: 
> Thanks Tobi for the tip.
> 
> however I also need the Data-Flow-Graph of each basic block/functions. 
> As I said, I need a view of how the instructions 'link' to each other 
> (via registers or memory aliasing or whatnot)
I believe that there is not yet a DOT printer for this kind of
information.
2012 Jun 09
2
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Dears,
I am new to this list, and hope this question is pertinent to this mailing
list.
I have been trying to use Clang to extract an AST from my source code, but
without success when attempting to do so with Graphviz.
I created a thread on Stackoverflow recently in hope any could help me [1],
but the question is actually pretty simple. I keep getting
Stmt::viewAST is only available in debug
2012 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Hi Carlos,
You can just download the source code from
http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.9 and then read
http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html which should tell you how to
compile it.
Joey
On 9 June 2012 21:10, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Would you recommend any specific link in respect on how to compile in
> debug mode? I
2009 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Edwin,
thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand.
Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored 
in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the 
graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have 
disjointed DFGs?).
inline comments follow...
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-09-06 17:30, Ioannis Nousias
2012 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Hi,
The -j option just says how many processes are started to parallelise the
build.
The default option is to build Debug+Asserts, so unless you add any extra
arguments when you run './configure', you should be fine!
Joey
On 9 June 2012 21:29, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joey!
>
> Thanks I just replied your message on stack and I was actually
2009 Aug 13
7
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Hi
I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I 
want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are 
chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling 
certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when 
invoking the compiler (I've seen some -print-cfg and -dot-cfg options 
mentioned in some source files,
2012 Jun 09
2
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Hi Alex,
Would you recommend any specific link in respect on how to compile in debug
mode? I downloaded the Mac OS version on the website so I did not compile
anything. I am sort of a rookie on bash but I should be able to figure my
way around this.
Also, is there any particular reason why this functionality is only
available on debug mode?
Thank you so much for the fast reply, was driving me
2009 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On 2009-09-06 17:30, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> I've tried to write a DFGPrinter based on the CFGPrinter, as you 
> suggested, but encountered problems.
>
> The GraphWriter expects 
> GraphTraits<GraphType>::nodes_begin()/nodes_end(). The way this is 
> implemented in CFG.h, a function is a graph of basic blocks. A 
> GraphTraits<Function*>  inherits from
2012 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang
Just to add one more thing. I have been trying to install the gv on my mac
os but I have not been successful either. The gv build requires xaw3d (
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Xaw3d ) which apparently has not been updated
for quite few years and the download is not even available anymore.
Carlos Andrade
http://carlosandrade.co
2012/6/9 Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com>
> Hi