similar to: Strange IPv6 in FreeBSD 9.1RC1

Hi all, We have a server with a LSI 9240-4i controller configured in JBOD with 4 SATA disks. Running FreeBSD 9.1-Beta1: Relevant dmesg: FreeBSD 9.1-BETA1 #0: Thu Jul 12 09:38:51 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (3200.09-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x206a7 Family = 6 Model =

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:52:52PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote: >On 10.02.2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people >> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with IMAPSieve. > >In my setup, I use the following sieve script globally for all users: > > if header :is "X-Spam-Flag"

> Try > > ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve.... # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2:22, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, ???? wrote: > >> Hello >>

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On February 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people > > not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with > > IMAPSieve. Comments and

Hello Because I did not send , and then retransmitted. I am using the CentOS5.7. In a state where the link down, I did a ping to the IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 succeeds in ping. but, IPv6 is ping fails. Once confirmed by ifconfig, it did not have a Link-Local Address. At link down, Is the Link-Local Address not set? Leave the link down, Is there a way to avoid this? # ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: ?

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello, I'm running a CentOS 5.6 server through linode. I am atempting to configure it for ipv6, previously this had been done though not by me on a ubuntu box so the hardware can take it. I've got an ipv6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric and at a shell prompt have done the following: ifconfig sit0 up ifconfig sit0 inet6 tunnel ::IPV4 Address ifconfig sit1 up ifconfig sit1 inet6 add IPV6

Hi, I have a kvm host and I try to install a centos 6 guest with a static ip address. When I do a manual install I eventually get to the network configuration and if I enter IP, gateway and DNS Server I can ping6 the guest from the host and I can ping6 the guest from outside. I do not want to do manual installation, so I have to specify a url to a kickstart file, but to download it the network

Hi, I have a process which is running as a linux service and assigns IP addresses using netlink to configued interface in linux. For IPv4 addresses i do not see any issue with this assignment. When i try to assign an IPv6 address, the address gets assigned successfully to the interface, but the Neighbour Solication request received for that address is not responded with and hence ping6 from a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

Guus Sliepen [2016-05-24 11:26 +0200] : > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: [...] > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > route -6 add -net

I have a Centos server that is running BIND and has IPv6 global addresses. I have entered a number of AAAA records into this copy of BIND in a local view and zone (tld is htt). Over IPv4, I have no trouble with nslookup ('nslookup - 127.0.0.1' and 'nslookup - 192.168.128.55'). I get the AAAA records back. But if I try to use the IPv6 address of the system I get a time out.

It seems dovecot is impatient with connecting with mysql, as I see in maillog entries like: Apr 6 11:48:30 z9m9z dovecot: dict: Error: mysql(localhost): Connect failed to database (postfix): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) - waiting for 5 seconds before retry Apr 6 11:48:35 z9m9z dovecot: dict: Error: mysql(localhost): Connect

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Ralph Seichter <dovecot-ml at seichter.de> wrote: > On 12.02.2017 17:36, George Kontostanos wrote: > >> it automatically creates a .spamassassin/ folder in the user > > That happens because sa-learn is invoked as the user who is logged into > IMAP. If you want all users to contribute to a global SpamAssassin > database (like I do),

Hello I've got two prefixes, one /48 and one /64 let's say these two 2001:db8:0815::/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::/64 the router has on it's ethernet interface the following to IPv6 addresses: 2001:db8:0815::1/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1/64 a windows box has 2001:db8:0815::17/48 and 2001:db8:0815::1 as it's gateway a linux box has 2001:db8:4711:cafe::11/64 and 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1 as

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ralph Seichter <dovecot-ml at seichter.de> wrote: > On 10.02.17 20:34, Michael Slusarz wrote: > > > When you move a message to a new mailbox, that is a "new message" > > event (a new UID in the target mailbox is created; the message count > > increases). So imap.mailbox is set to the name of the *target* mailbox. > >