similar to: Bonding Eth interfaces - unexpeceted results

I have the xensource 3.1.0 x86_64 tarball installed over a RHEL5 clone distribution. The "ethtool" utility only returns the following information: [root@fermigrid5 etc]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Link detected: yes [root@fermigrid5 etc]# Since I have no vanilla-installed rhel5 machines with which to compare, I am not sure if I am dealing with a bug in the ethtool (whose

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

Dovid Bender writes: > Just guessing I would verify that the out of : iptables -L -nv > Shows no dropped packets, try disabling selinux as well as look at the > limits of the asterisk pid (cat /proc/<Asterisk PID>/limits). I know the > defualt for rhel is 1024 which was never enough for us. Thanks for the hints. Selinux is disabled, there is no outgoing firewall (anymore)

First,sorry my poor english~ Here is this test: Virtualization performance comparison test Test environment Physical machine: Cpu 8-core 8G memory HDD: 147G xen virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive wmware virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive Optical disk array (san) Size: 7.7T Speed: 6G/sec Testing and structural I / 0 performance test Test methods Test

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for

I am trying to connect two workstations (CentOS 3&4) directly using a straight through cat 5e cable with a crossover adapter on one of the ends. Both hosts have gigabit-capable ethernet card. According to lspci host 1 has: 03:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) and host 2 has: 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group

I''m trying to build out a test cloud using XCP 1.0.0 beta with 3 machines of 18 cores total (Phenom II 1090s). I''ve built three machines, installed XCP 1.0.0 beta on them and they all three have the same problem - the Realtek network cards don''t work. The following is the output from lspci 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI

Hello everyone I am running into some strange issues when configuring networking interfaces on my physical server running Centos 7.5. Let me give you an overview of what's going on: We have a physical server, running CentOS 7.5. This server has one 4 port NIC and one 2 port NIC and a Dell IDRAC port. The first port of the 4 port NIC, em1, is used for Management traffic. The first port of

Hello everyone: Over the past few years I have been a happy samba user, running samba on Redhat / FC platforms. Recently I upgraded hardware, and Samba hasn't been performing well at all.. which makes me sad :-( The new hardware is Asus P5B board with a dual-core intel processor. This board has an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B gigabit ethernet controller, which was a hassle to setup.

On 10/10/2016 5:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro > X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. > The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable > to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). > > These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather

Hello All, I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content. When the

Dear All, I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv : 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) It is detected, but why the speed is always 100Mbps, already change cable but still no luck. I use ethtool and from the output it seems that system know that this NIC support gigabit speed : ???????

in dom0, how does one get and set the link information for a NIC? In a non-xen kernel, we could get this info by simply running: # ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes:

Ethy H. Brito writes: > > Ifconfig output looks like this: > > > > root at communiceer:~# ifconfig eth1 > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr b4:99:ba:a9:3e:e5 > > inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.127 Mask:255.255.255.128 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:5967421 errors:0 dropped:21425

Last problem I had involved changing one character in my configuration scripts. Really easy once someone showed me what was wrong. Well I think this issue is just the same. The moment I used apt to install the Xen kernal and tools I lost internet connectivity. I have been managing because I can restore connectivity be deleting the bridge mpower@dodtsair:~$ sudo ifdown eth0

We have an HP DL360 server with dual on-board Tigon3 ethernet cards. We are using eth0, eth1 is unused at the moment. Sometimes when the network interface is under heavy load, for example moving large file transfers over rsync or NFS, the network interface stops working and we lose all connection to the server. The only solution at this point is to jump on the console and restart the network

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Dear List, I'm hoping there is someone that might give me some pointers to solving the following problem. I run Mac OSX Tiger and perform a filecopy using Finder to a samba share on a Gentoo Linux machine running samba version 3.0.14a. Copying a 1GB file to the fileserver takes roughly 2 hours (33,9 MB in 4 min). This means 142 kb/s over a Gigabit network. Now here is the strange thing: When