similar to: NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "NFS mounts group name shows as nobody"

2012 Sep 13
1
cannot write to CIFS shares on a Windows box from Centos 6
Another issue that I found was that I cannot write to CIFS shares on a Windows server with Centos 6. I can write to them from Centos 5 and older Fedora versions, but not from Centos 6. Any ideas on what needs to be changed or where I can start looking for some indication of what is wrong? Thank you, Ryan Palamara ZAIS Group, LLC 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Phone: (732)
2012 Aug 10
1
shutting down a cluster member for maintenance on VMware
I need to shutdown a cluster member for maintenance. The member is a VM and uses VM fencing, which tries to reboot the VM as part of its operation. What would be the best method to shutdown this cluster member to perform maintenance on the servers? I have already moved the cluster services to other nodes. Thank you, Ryan Palamara ZAIS Group, LLC 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322 Red Bank, New Jersey
2006 Dec 21
1
multinom(nnet) analogy for biglm package?
I would like to perform a multinomial logistic regression on a large data set, but do not know how. I've only thought of a few possibilities and write to seek advice and guidance on them or deepening or expanding my search. On smaller data sets, I have successfully loaded the data and issued commands such as: length(levels(factor(data$response))) [1] 6 # implies polychotomy library(nnet)
2006 Sep 22
1
How to retrieve results of most recent command?
In R, is there an automatic variable that stores the results of the most recent command or commands? (I am thinking of a behavior like Mathematica's % result-history substitution syntax.) (I am using R 2.3.1 on Linux and R 2.3.1 on Windows XP.) This is a pretty basic question, so I tried to do an extensive version of the recommended pre-posting homework. >
2016 Aug 24
1
Gnome weather applet stranded
On Wed, August 24, 2016 10:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > isdtor wrote: >> The Gnome weather report applet has ceased working on CentOS5/6. >> http://weather.noaa.gov/ says "This service is no longer available". Are >> there any good alternatives? I liked the applet as it allowed the use of >> a >> custom radar map. >> >> As I just
2019 Apr 03
2
nobody:nobody
On 4/3/19 5:29 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> >> Content of idmapd.conf: > > > As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be > configured specifically. > > >> Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it >> that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS
2019 Apr 03
3
nobody:nobody
On 4/3/19 6:43 AM, mark wrote: > On 04/02/19 20:21, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey Y'all, >> >> For the last week or more I've been trying to get NFS and OpenLDAP to >> play nice with each other.? I've pretty much worn the Google machine >> out trying to find a solution.? I've found several that said "Solved" >> but none of those
2019 Apr 03
0
nobody:nobody
On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Content of idmapd.conf: As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be configured specifically. > Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it > that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS work?? Doesn't > seem to make sense to me. idmapd is not imapd.? idmapd (aka
2015 Dec 15
4
File Share Problem Between SAMBA AND WINDOWS 7
hi, i have installded samba 4 oncentos 7 and started to use as part of active directory. But i have a problemabout sharing files between samba and windows 7. i can browse and edit sharedfiles and folders on windows 7. But when i create a new folder, the owner of the folder is seen as ?#User300012?instead of the real samba user. My sharing steps 1-?????i have add a user named ?ege? on centos
2016 Aug 29
6
CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody
Hi, We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to it. We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). We copied over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from our front-end server to our NAS server. If we log in to the NAS server we see the files owned by their
2016 Aug 29
0
CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:59:31 -0400 Pat Haley wrote: > We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody Here are my notes for dealing with this issue: If all users come up as nobody on a nfs mount: Add nfs server name to the Domain = line in /etc/idmapd.conf on both the server and the clients, i.e. Domain = nameof.server /sbin/service rpcidmapd restart /sbin/service nfslock restart
2019 Apr 03
1
nobody:nobody
Hey Y'all, For the last week or more I've been trying to get NFS and OpenLDAP to play nice with each other. I've pretty much worn the Google machine out trying to find a solution. I've found several that said "Solved" but none of those solutions solved my nobody:nobody problem. In the past I've used NFS in conjunction with NIS to share home directories from my
2015 Jun 14
3
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
On Sat, June 13, 2015 17:56, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > As I said about these services here (KGB, CIA, MI-6, ...) there > is no "ex" for their agents. The only way one retired from these > organizations is dead, feet first dead. > A bit hyperbolic. One could with as much justification state that there is no such thing as an ex-marine, an ex-seal, an ex-commissioned
2002 Mar 14
2
Some users can't log in -- server shows username as "nobody"
Okay, this is a recurring problem that really has me frustrated. I have a samba server that's using security=server. There are four people who use it. It works fine for three of them, but the fourth one gets endlessly prompted for his password and is never allowed to log in. All are from NT 4.0 clients. What's really puzzling is that when I look at the log at debug level 2, I get the
2013 Sep 20
2
NFS mounted files owned by nobody
I have 2 centos boxes and I want to NFS mount a dir from one to the other. When I do that the files on the client all are owned by nobody.nobody. I verified that the user and group of the files on the server exist on both hosts and have the same uid and gid. I googled and found this: http://whacked.net/2006/07/26/nfsv4nfs-mapid-nobody-domain/ domainname on both machines returns (none). I edited
2016 Aug 30
0
CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:59:31PM -0400, Pat Haley wrote: > ... We > noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). If its NFSv4, then its most likely a problem with your idmapper. Make sure that the rpc.idmapd is running on your client, and that your server has appropriate ID mapping enabled. If its NFSv4, are you using sec=krb5*? -- Jonathan Billings
2009 Mar 31
4
Tax Preparation with WINE
As approximately 130 million other US citizens, I am dutifully preparing for the April deadline for filing my income tax returns. Reviewing the WINE AppDB for installable tax software to help out in the process, it appeared that 2nd Story Software's TAX ACT was most likely to work with the WINE version (1.1.17) installed on my Mandriva-equipped HP laptop. As it turned out, TAX ACT was able
2014 Mar 17
1
NFS Mount: files owned by nobody
This is one of those simple-been-doing-this-forever things that, for some reason, has me stumped today. When I try to NFS (v4) mount a directory, the user/group ownership shows up as user "nobody" even though /etc/passwd has values for the correct user names. How do I get it to mount with the correct user IDs? Hume is the server, running CentOS 6, all updates applied, maybe a week
2018 Mar 02
2
Smbstatus shows many nobody users from win10 pc's
I know more people posted about this , but i see no solution. smbstatus gives over 100 nobody users The windows 10 pc is doing nothing, just a reboot ( and logon ) , than this happens: Samba version 4.6.2 Centos 7. PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing
2013 Mar 28
3
DNS forwarding vs recursion
I have 2 CentOS servers that are both authoritative DNS for several domains and local resolvers. As configured, they are publicly visible resolvers, which I've known for awhile is not a good thing. whats the appropriate way of configuring the bind on CentOS 5.current to not allow recursion on queries from the public side, but still allow recursion locally? is it as simple as adding